This user may have left Wikipedia. Abu badali has not edited Wikipedia since August 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Don't do this. Requiring some measure of verification is reasonable, undoing an adminstrative decision is not. Next time, bring your concern to the closing admin. ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 00:35, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Please help constructively improve image rationales rather than jumping the gun through the IFD process when such noms are not really necessary. I've noticed that a couple of your nominations were based on reasonings that were easily and quickly fixable. -- Strothra 01:28, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Arafat_in_Lebanon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali ( talk) 18:34, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
“ | This file became under the conditions "of the Creative Commons denomination passing on under same conditions Germany"- license (shortened "CC-by-SA") in the version 2.0 publishes. | ” |
p.s. I've been wanting to ask you if Wikipedia would allow me or any other user to upload an image off a news website such as the BBC? -- Al Ameer son 18:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Although we don't always see eye to eye, I wonder if you'd agree with me here. I'd also appreciate your thoughs on whether images at List of Chobits characters, Trinity Blood, Chobits, Bleach (manga), and List of Bleach characters and similar articles are indeed ok under our fair use policies?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 22:16, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
A request for arbitration involving you has been filed here. Please view the request, and add any statements you feel are necessary for the ArbCom to consider in deciding whether to hear the dispute. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I used that image you created to represent injured footballers in some articles like this one FC_Barcelona_2007-08_season#Squad_stats. By the way, well done image. I think it's not the right image for injured people, since you intend to be use to disable people. So, I'd like to know if you could make a similar one to injured people. I think just adding a bottom part of the leg in a light color (maybe grey), like the person has a cast leg. Thanks in advance. -- ClaudioMB 22:39, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
I just realized that you've been gone for a while, seeing as your last contribution was on 19:39, August 30, 2007! I appreciate your contributions, and hope you haven't left for good (though a break is probably a good idea :D). -- Iamunknown 01:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
For all your hard work keeping Wikipedia a free encyclopedia. I anxiously await your return after our (inevitable, in my opinion) Siegenthaler-esque copyright scandal. Calliopejen1 23:16, 22 September 2007 (UTC) |
I see you participate in WP:FUR debates. I would like to call your attention to an expedited evaluation request at Wikipedia:Fair_use_review#October_5.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 14:38, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Added to Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Abu, how are you doing? I received a request to have an image deleted. I believe that you are more familiar in this sort of thing then I am since in the past I have interacted with you. I will post the request here and would like you to look into the matter for me.
Hiya Tony! Can I bug you for a favor? About two weeks ago a pair of fair use images were tagged as being considered for deletion. I didn't make a move to save them becuase the sourcing requirements for these two images were to hard to come up with, and I was not entirely sure that they had been published off Wikipedia, so I decided the best thing to do would be to allow both to be deleted. The first one was, but for some reason the second one ( Image:Tom II (Toonami).JPG) is still here, and its been almost two weeks since it was up for deleteion. I don't think anyone will object to deleting it at this point (its been tagged since september), so could you delete it for me? I would apreciate it. TomStar81 ( Talk) 08:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Abu, how are you can you look at the copy right issue of this pic. It is being used in number of places in violation of WP:NPOV and creating other problems, especially in Sri Lankan civil war, this pic is used exlusively. Thanks Taprobanus 14:12, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:The Sartorialist screenshot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Greetings Abu badali, I'm visiting you now because I'm wondering if I would be able to keep an image of the long-awaited Fatah flag I will try to upload. I finally found the entire flag in an appropriate layout here, [4] and particularly this one [5] from Flags of the World. It is stated at the bottom of the page in the first source I gave you that "Flags of the World is produced and maintained by an Editorial Staff of unpaid volunteers and the contents of these pages are offered freely to the Internet community." I also have the name of the producer of the photo, Eugene Ipavec and the date it was uploaded or taken which was September 28, 2005. Your advice/permission. -- Al Ameer son 06:51, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I've ben trying to convince some editors that screenshots are preferred over promotional images, but in researching the subject have found no such admonitions on any fair use image guideline pages. Even the {{ Non-free promotional}} template warns against using fair use images to show what living people look like, but nothing about a preference for screenshots. I believe I got the initial sense of this from your comments at the "soap images" ifd below, and similar arguments in the other areas I've linked below. I'm wondering if you've come across any changes in the policy either way since then; certainly the additioning of the "has rationale" parameter to the promo template suggests some consensus in this arena.
Thanks in advance. — TAnthony Talk 21:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
As a leading editor at Heidi Klum and Fernanda Tavares you may have an interest in the debate at Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2008_June_27 regarding swimsuit issue templates.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 01:23, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:OldManWillow1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. De728631 ( talk) 14:40, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of hostage crises until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:11, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
This user may have left Wikipedia. Abu badali has not edited Wikipedia since August 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Don't do this. Requiring some measure of verification is reasonable, undoing an adminstrative decision is not. Next time, bring your concern to the closing admin. ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 00:35, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Please help constructively improve image rationales rather than jumping the gun through the IFD process when such noms are not really necessary. I've noticed that a couple of your nominations were based on reasonings that were easily and quickly fixable. -- Strothra 01:28, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Arafat_in_Lebanon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali ( talk) 18:34, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
“ | This file became under the conditions "of the Creative Commons denomination passing on under same conditions Germany"- license (shortened "CC-by-SA") in the version 2.0 publishes. | ” |
p.s. I've been wanting to ask you if Wikipedia would allow me or any other user to upload an image off a news website such as the BBC? -- Al Ameer son 18:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Although we don't always see eye to eye, I wonder if you'd agree with me here. I'd also appreciate your thoughs on whether images at List of Chobits characters, Trinity Blood, Chobits, Bleach (manga), and List of Bleach characters and similar articles are indeed ok under our fair use policies?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 22:16, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
A request for arbitration involving you has been filed here. Please view the request, and add any statements you feel are necessary for the ArbCom to consider in deciding whether to hear the dispute. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I used that image you created to represent injured footballers in some articles like this one FC_Barcelona_2007-08_season#Squad_stats. By the way, well done image. I think it's not the right image for injured people, since you intend to be use to disable people. So, I'd like to know if you could make a similar one to injured people. I think just adding a bottom part of the leg in a light color (maybe grey), like the person has a cast leg. Thanks in advance. -- ClaudioMB 22:39, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
I just realized that you've been gone for a while, seeing as your last contribution was on 19:39, August 30, 2007! I appreciate your contributions, and hope you haven't left for good (though a break is probably a good idea :D). -- Iamunknown 01:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
For all your hard work keeping Wikipedia a free encyclopedia. I anxiously await your return after our (inevitable, in my opinion) Siegenthaler-esque copyright scandal. Calliopejen1 23:16, 22 September 2007 (UTC) |
I see you participate in WP:FUR debates. I would like to call your attention to an expedited evaluation request at Wikipedia:Fair_use_review#October_5.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 14:38, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Added to Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Abu, how are you doing? I received a request to have an image deleted. I believe that you are more familiar in this sort of thing then I am since in the past I have interacted with you. I will post the request here and would like you to look into the matter for me.
Hiya Tony! Can I bug you for a favor? About two weeks ago a pair of fair use images were tagged as being considered for deletion. I didn't make a move to save them becuase the sourcing requirements for these two images were to hard to come up with, and I was not entirely sure that they had been published off Wikipedia, so I decided the best thing to do would be to allow both to be deleted. The first one was, but for some reason the second one ( Image:Tom II (Toonami).JPG) is still here, and its been almost two weeks since it was up for deleteion. I don't think anyone will object to deleting it at this point (its been tagged since september), so could you delete it for me? I would apreciate it. TomStar81 ( Talk) 08:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Abu, how are you can you look at the copy right issue of this pic. It is being used in number of places in violation of WP:NPOV and creating other problems, especially in Sri Lankan civil war, this pic is used exlusively. Thanks Taprobanus 14:12, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:The Sartorialist screenshot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Greetings Abu badali, I'm visiting you now because I'm wondering if I would be able to keep an image of the long-awaited Fatah flag I will try to upload. I finally found the entire flag in an appropriate layout here, [4] and particularly this one [5] from Flags of the World. It is stated at the bottom of the page in the first source I gave you that "Flags of the World is produced and maintained by an Editorial Staff of unpaid volunteers and the contents of these pages are offered freely to the Internet community." I also have the name of the producer of the photo, Eugene Ipavec and the date it was uploaded or taken which was September 28, 2005. Your advice/permission. -- Al Ameer son 06:51, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I've ben trying to convince some editors that screenshots are preferred over promotional images, but in researching the subject have found no such admonitions on any fair use image guideline pages. Even the {{ Non-free promotional}} template warns against using fair use images to show what living people look like, but nothing about a preference for screenshots. I believe I got the initial sense of this from your comments at the "soap images" ifd below, and similar arguments in the other areas I've linked below. I'm wondering if you've come across any changes in the policy either way since then; certainly the additioning of the "has rationale" parameter to the promo template suggests some consensus in this arena.
Thanks in advance. — TAnthony Talk 21:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
As a leading editor at Heidi Klum and Fernanda Tavares you may have an interest in the debate at Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2008_June_27 regarding swimsuit issue templates.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 01:23, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:OldManWillow1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. De728631 ( talk) 14:40, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of hostage crises until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:11, 3 November 2022 (UTC)