![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Hello, 4me689, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on
my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome!
HiLo48 (
talk)
01:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
I'm Sm8900, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some
common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at
my talk page or type {{helpme}}
here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can
contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can
use a sandbox. You can
create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}}
on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click
here to start it.
Please remember to:
~~~~
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your
signature, a link to your talk page, and a
timestamp.Sincerely,
Sm8900 (
talk)
02:58, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
(Leave me a message)
Sm8900 ( talk) 02:58, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Olivia Newton-John shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. General Ization Talk 04:15, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:4me689 reported by User:Polyamorph (Result: ). Thank you.
Polyamorph (
talk)
07:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
. Rhodewarrick471 ( talk) 20:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page M87.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
You do realize that Jack Layton controlled the government of Canada via a BoP system between 2004 and 2011 right? Golden Matrix ( talk) 23:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
What does the caption "protestors protesting the 2000 United States presidential election" mean, in your latest collage? What were they protesting against and why is this considered significant when it's not mentioned in the article on that election? Deb ( talk) 17:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello! You've mentioned me on several occasions to participate in some discussions. I'm just contacting you to apologize because I haven't been around most of the time. Since I've started a new job and moved, my activity on Wikipedia has decreased a lot. I tell you this mostly to let you know that I've been attentive to the discussions you have opened, and I will try to participate in them more assiduously. By the way, do you think it's convenient to put in 2017 collage any photo related to 2017-2018 Spanish constitutional crisis? Politically it marked that year, although perhaps not as much as Trump's presidency, and a unilateral declaration of independence in the fourth power of the European Union and everything that came afterwards I think is quite important. Greetings! _-_Alsor ( talk) 08:32, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Will you please open up an RFC on whether or not to add College images, concerning all Year in... pages? Boldly adding them isn't the best route. GoodDay ( talk) 20:46, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Nevermind. I've opened up an RFC on this matter, at the talkpage of Wikipedia:WikiProject Years. In the meantime, please don't add any more college images, until an RFC result is reached. GoodDay ( talk) 21:22, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Heya! Just wanted to let you know I'm going to be going on wikibreak for a bit starting tomorrow. During this time, I won't be able to respond to pings, so please refrain from pinging me to discussions. Thanks for all you do on the Wiki, and I hope to see you soon. :) InvadingInvader ( talk) 18:25, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
I am copying down the wikitext for all the decades montages in the event these people end up deleting them so we have a backup of them. The ganymedian ( talk) 21:25, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi 4me689! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
2022 several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:2022, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. You and MrMimikyu1998 are very close to edit warring, discuss on the talk page about the image instead of just reverting to your preferred version. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 00:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Howdy. It would be best if you opened an RFC on whether or not, to put the federal government section in box form. Note, that that form isn't in the other Year in the United States pages & so attempting to put it in the 2022 in the United States & 2023 in the United States pages, appears out of step. GoodDay ( talk) 03:21, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
I see you went ahead and breached Canvassing by contacting editors who 'might' favour your position in an RFC. GoodDay ( talk) 00:57, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
On 26 October 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ash Carter, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 23:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
RE
[1]: I'm sorry, but maybe ITN isn't the right place for you at this moment. In thread-after-thread the past several days, you show a fundamental misunderstanding of policy (that's ok! You are still a newbie and have lots of room to grow
) (in this case,
WP:Red link). There are far better areas on Wikipedia to become better acquainted with policies than ITN. Consider
finding a mentor or becoming an
AfC reviewr.
Curbon7 (
talk)
13:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
I contemplated coming here to say the same thing. We (as in the community) value a wide range of opinions at ITN, and there's nothing wrong with being against consensus, but a lot of the time your posts give off the impression that you have no idea what you're talking about (as Curbon says, more kindly, above). So I concur with him that ITN might not be the place for you right now. By the way, I cannot figure out the meaning of what you've typed above, would you please elaborate? — VersaceSpace 🌃 00:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
On 31 October 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Pierre Soulages, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 23:59, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
On 8 November 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Balakh Sher Mazari, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 01:43, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Deb (
talk)
09:16, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Howdy. From other editors' input at the YEAR RFC', I've gotten the impression that you've been accused of canvassing in the past. Also, when an editor (who supports you) suddenly appears after the RFC tag has expired? Something will look fishy. NOTE: An RFC closer is going to look over the 'canvassing' & it's highly likely that partially on your actions, the closer will rule the RFC as no to the collage images. I'm not one to report editors. But, I'm willing to point out to you, that your actions at the RFC are only hurting your cause, not helping it. GoodDay ( talk) 02:36, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
May do so, after the Year RFC is closed. GoodDay ( talk) 18:14, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
@ 4me689 I was wondering if I had your permission to make your photomontage into a singular image map similar to articles like 2012, 2013, 2015, 2017, 2018, etc? This will be so that when someone hovers their cursor over said year article, they will see all the pictures of the montage instead of just one. I will still give you credit for it.
Let me know your thoughts.
Thanks The ganymedian ( talk) 20:59, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Howdy. In the RFC (you've opened), you've removed the "2", I added. By doing so, you'll end up having editors being directed to the 'discussion' of an earlier RFC on that talkpage. GoodDay ( talk) 18:17, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, 4me689,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username EchidnaLives, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Deaths in 2023 for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|EchidnaLives}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
echidnaLives - talk - edits 21:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Deaths in 2023, is not suitable as written to remain published. We can move it back to the mainspace when 2023 arrives, or maybe 1 or 2 days before. 1 month is too far in advance. I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
echidnaLives -
talk -
edits
22:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
A compromise. Using the college at 2022 in the United States as an example. Perhaps it's alright to add colleges, if they're downsized. GoodDay ( talk) 23:50, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
On 4 December 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Abu al-Hasan al-Hashimi al-Qurashi, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 19:19, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Draft:Deaths in 2023 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
article already exists Deaths in 2023
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WWGB ( talk) 10:16, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
@ 4me689 Long time, no see. Before 2022 ends, would you (or I can do it) be willing to swap out a photo or two from 2022 collage? My opinion is that monkeypox did not turn out to be that big of a deal. I think this year's world cup is worthy of a spot. And maybe the picture of the kid after the earthquake can be replaced with the Honga Tonga volcano eruption, which turned out to be the largest of the 21st century so far. Let me know your thoughts ASAP. The ganymedian ( talk) 16:30, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —
Locke Cole •
t •
c
06:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, 4me689. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Deaths in 2023, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 14:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Hello, 4me689, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on
my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome!
HiLo48 (
talk)
01:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
I'm Sm8900, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some
common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at
my talk page or type {{helpme}}
here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can
contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can
use a sandbox. You can
create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}}
on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click
here to start it.
Please remember to:
~~~~
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your
signature, a link to your talk page, and a
timestamp.Sincerely,
Sm8900 (
talk)
02:58, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
(Leave me a message)
Sm8900 ( talk) 02:58, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Olivia Newton-John shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. General Ization Talk 04:15, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:4me689 reported by User:Polyamorph (Result: ). Thank you.
Polyamorph (
talk)
07:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
. Rhodewarrick471 ( talk) 20:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page M87.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
You do realize that Jack Layton controlled the government of Canada via a BoP system between 2004 and 2011 right? Golden Matrix ( talk) 23:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
What does the caption "protestors protesting the 2000 United States presidential election" mean, in your latest collage? What were they protesting against and why is this considered significant when it's not mentioned in the article on that election? Deb ( talk) 17:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello! You've mentioned me on several occasions to participate in some discussions. I'm just contacting you to apologize because I haven't been around most of the time. Since I've started a new job and moved, my activity on Wikipedia has decreased a lot. I tell you this mostly to let you know that I've been attentive to the discussions you have opened, and I will try to participate in them more assiduously. By the way, do you think it's convenient to put in 2017 collage any photo related to 2017-2018 Spanish constitutional crisis? Politically it marked that year, although perhaps not as much as Trump's presidency, and a unilateral declaration of independence in the fourth power of the European Union and everything that came afterwards I think is quite important. Greetings! _-_Alsor ( talk) 08:32, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Will you please open up an RFC on whether or not to add College images, concerning all Year in... pages? Boldly adding them isn't the best route. GoodDay ( talk) 20:46, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Nevermind. I've opened up an RFC on this matter, at the talkpage of Wikipedia:WikiProject Years. In the meantime, please don't add any more college images, until an RFC result is reached. GoodDay ( talk) 21:22, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Heya! Just wanted to let you know I'm going to be going on wikibreak for a bit starting tomorrow. During this time, I won't be able to respond to pings, so please refrain from pinging me to discussions. Thanks for all you do on the Wiki, and I hope to see you soon. :) InvadingInvader ( talk) 18:25, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
I am copying down the wikitext for all the decades montages in the event these people end up deleting them so we have a backup of them. The ganymedian ( talk) 21:25, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi 4me689! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
2022 several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:2022, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. You and MrMimikyu1998 are very close to edit warring, discuss on the talk page about the image instead of just reverting to your preferred version. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 00:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Howdy. It would be best if you opened an RFC on whether or not, to put the federal government section in box form. Note, that that form isn't in the other Year in the United States pages & so attempting to put it in the 2022 in the United States & 2023 in the United States pages, appears out of step. GoodDay ( talk) 03:21, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
I see you went ahead and breached Canvassing by contacting editors who 'might' favour your position in an RFC. GoodDay ( talk) 00:57, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
On 26 October 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ash Carter, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 23:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
RE
[1]: I'm sorry, but maybe ITN isn't the right place for you at this moment. In thread-after-thread the past several days, you show a fundamental misunderstanding of policy (that's ok! You are still a newbie and have lots of room to grow
) (in this case,
WP:Red link). There are far better areas on Wikipedia to become better acquainted with policies than ITN. Consider
finding a mentor or becoming an
AfC reviewr.
Curbon7 (
talk)
13:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
I contemplated coming here to say the same thing. We (as in the community) value a wide range of opinions at ITN, and there's nothing wrong with being against consensus, but a lot of the time your posts give off the impression that you have no idea what you're talking about (as Curbon says, more kindly, above). So I concur with him that ITN might not be the place for you right now. By the way, I cannot figure out the meaning of what you've typed above, would you please elaborate? — VersaceSpace 🌃 00:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
On 31 October 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Pierre Soulages, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 23:59, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
On 8 November 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Balakh Sher Mazari, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 01:43, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Deb (
talk)
09:16, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Howdy. From other editors' input at the YEAR RFC', I've gotten the impression that you've been accused of canvassing in the past. Also, when an editor (who supports you) suddenly appears after the RFC tag has expired? Something will look fishy. NOTE: An RFC closer is going to look over the 'canvassing' & it's highly likely that partially on your actions, the closer will rule the RFC as no to the collage images. I'm not one to report editors. But, I'm willing to point out to you, that your actions at the RFC are only hurting your cause, not helping it. GoodDay ( talk) 02:36, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
May do so, after the Year RFC is closed. GoodDay ( talk) 18:14, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
@ 4me689 I was wondering if I had your permission to make your photomontage into a singular image map similar to articles like 2012, 2013, 2015, 2017, 2018, etc? This will be so that when someone hovers their cursor over said year article, they will see all the pictures of the montage instead of just one. I will still give you credit for it.
Let me know your thoughts.
Thanks The ganymedian ( talk) 20:59, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Howdy. In the RFC (you've opened), you've removed the "2", I added. By doing so, you'll end up having editors being directed to the 'discussion' of an earlier RFC on that talkpage. GoodDay ( talk) 18:17, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, 4me689,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username EchidnaLives, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Deaths in 2023 for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|EchidnaLives}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
echidnaLives - talk - edits 21:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Deaths in 2023, is not suitable as written to remain published. We can move it back to the mainspace when 2023 arrives, or maybe 1 or 2 days before. 1 month is too far in advance. I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
echidnaLives -
talk -
edits
22:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
A compromise. Using the college at 2022 in the United States as an example. Perhaps it's alright to add colleges, if they're downsized. GoodDay ( talk) 23:50, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
On 4 December 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Abu al-Hasan al-Hashimi al-Qurashi, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 19:19, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Draft:Deaths in 2023 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
article already exists Deaths in 2023
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WWGB ( talk) 10:16, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
@ 4me689 Long time, no see. Before 2022 ends, would you (or I can do it) be willing to swap out a photo or two from 2022 collage? My opinion is that monkeypox did not turn out to be that big of a deal. I think this year's world cup is worthy of a spot. And maybe the picture of the kid after the earthquake can be replaced with the Honga Tonga volcano eruption, which turned out to be the largest of the 21st century so far. Let me know your thoughts ASAP. The ganymedian ( talk) 16:30, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —
Locke Cole •
t •
c
06:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, 4me689. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Deaths in 2023, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 14:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)