![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
![]() |
AFLW Barnstar |
For work on the AFLW articles. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:35, 19 February 2019 (UTC) |
On 26 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nina Morrison, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nina Morrison was nominated for the 2019 AFL Women's Rising Star award on debut – but suffered a season-ending knee injury in training the next week? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nina Morrison. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Nina Morrison), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:02, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, the edit I made on the ...And Justice For All page was removed, however I don't think it should have been removed. ...And Justice for Jason is an edited version of the album that provides actual audio of the bass track from the album. There are several existing parts of the article that already discuss the missing bass track, and this would provide readers the ability to hear the album with the audible bass track. Elasticat ( talk) 18:07, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
I have Template:Did you know nominations/2019 AFL Women's Grand Final up for review at DYK. If you could review it, that would be great. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:32, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Joshua, please explain to me what it was that I did wrong on the Talk page of Metallica's Load? I directly quoted a passage that quoted James Hetfield and was on the main article page. If the passage that I quoted was incorrect then perhaps you should look at taking that down, no? Also, please tell me what the Talk page is for if not to foster a constructive discussion? I don't view that as vandalism. I don't know if there is an equivalent in Australia, but in the United States we have the First Amendment. Feel free to look it up if you're unfamiliar with the concept. Only fascists threaten to shut down viewpoints that they don't agree with by using censorship, banning, and book burning. Cheers! FiggazWithAttitude ( talk) 14:07, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
As I said, it was not a random quote but directly POSTED ON THE MAIN ARTICLE PAGE BY SOMEONE ELSE.
Since you ask NOW (what were you actually trying to do/achieve?) - I think that the quote by Hetfield is the first I've heard that and if anyone could expound upon it I would appreciate it. Now I'll never get that chance because you have taken it upon yourself to silence that discussion.
I'm so glad that there are people like you looking out for "countless others". Keep up the good work, you're the winner. Cheers! FiggazWithAttitude ( talk) 15:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Recently I edited on Megadeth’s page and you deleted all of it, I replaced heavy metal with thrash, I specified and included the two songs that were banned. 70.15.64.235 ( talk) 02:33, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
I didn’t “change genres to my suit my point of view” it says right in the beginning of the page that they are part of the big four *thrash* bands 70.15.64.235 ( talk) 02:58, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi 4The Wynne,
I made a couple of edits to SoG's page that were undone. I feel that they should have been left and perhaps applied to similar pages. The change of wording 'for' in place of 'after' for finals series background colours is the correct grammar. After the finals series, by definition, is after the finals and the Home & Away matches inclusive. Using the preposition 'for' limits the stats to the finals matches only. This is consistent with the use of 'for' in the first category 'Led the league for the season only'
In actual fact, the three categories for stats should be 'Home & Away Matches', 'Finals Matches' and 'Season Matches' (Both H&A and finals combined) since these are the matches which determine the AFL Premiership Season. The AFL season should not be construed to include pre-season matches, interstate matches or International Rules matches even though some of these appearances contribute to a players stats for the year as well.
As far as the background colour of the stats are concerned, Gary Ablett Jr led the league for Brownlow votes in the years when he won the Brownlow. Why wouldn't the background colour be used to reflect that achievement? Why delete the colour? I did make an observation about the possibility of winning the Brownlow with less votes than another player but this did not occur in either season when GA Jr won the medal.
Please consider re-instating the amendments that I applied.
Please consider if these amendments might be applied more generally.
Please consider changing to 'Home & Away' to describe matches for premiership points rather than the conflicted term 'Season' matches.
Appreciate your time, Malchemist ( talk) 08:14, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for responding,
You are correct that I did not understand your thoughts re the original undo. If the stats were colour coded based on the terms you suggest, then why are there three categories;
Using your logic, the final two categories are the same, so one is redundant. The inclusion of "...finals only" conflicts with the explanation as well.
As regards the background colour in the Brownlow votes column, I just applied the colour stipulated in the legend at the top of the table. It was NOT a random colour.
Applying a stated, and presumably agreed, colour is not an issue for the WikiTalk page. Maybe the wording of a confused legend is, but to my mind it is a minor grammatical edit.
However, I agree that changing/clarifying whether use of 'Home and Away' for the preliminary rounds of the season may be best addressed there, so I won't pursue that further on this page.
Thank you for your thoughts, Malchemist ( talk) 22:44, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi 4TheWynne....
I made an edit on the article for the Machine Head album Burn My Eyes. I removed alternative metal from the infobox because it was in the AllMusic genre sidebar, then you reverted my edit and left a message on my talk page saying that my edit did not have a valid reason and "does not appear to be constructive". Then I made a couple attempts to add in some genres with sources I thought were usable, but those got turned down. So why do I keep removing alternative metal? Because 1. THAT'S NOT WHAT THE ALBUM IS!! It's really groove/thrash metal, but of course those can't be added without sources, right?? If one of their albums was considered alternative metal, it would most likely be either Supercharger or Catharsis. 2. The rules about using sources clearly state in its exact words: "AllMusic's genre sidebar should be avoided. Previous discussions at WP:ALBUMS and RSN have evinced that they can be incongruous with the reviewer's prose, which should take precedent over the sidebar." I'm guessing you never read those rules clearly or you think the sidebar has some reliable potential. So rather than continuing the edit fight even further, I would suggest starting a new discussion at WP:ALBUMS and/or RSN talking about whether the AllMusic sidebar should actually be used for genres or not. If the admins agree with you and decide to use the sidebar, then you may keep the alternative metal. If the admins say no to the sidebar, then those genres are out. Please take your time to consider this. Thank you and good day.... SirZPthundergod9001 ( talk) 06:07, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Had no idea about that revert 22 hours ago A.R.M. 10:52, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello Joshua, Thank you for editing the edits I made to the Queensland Rail page, this is some of my first edits to Wikipedia so it is greatly appreciated to see people refining and generally making my work better. One thing to note on your edits though, as of yesterday (Wednesday 4/09/19) EMU 01 now residies with QR heritage at Ipswich, effectively making it part of the heritage fleet, I added this to reflect the change.
Thanks again Reef — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reef Thomspon ( talk • contribs) 04:13, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
I did not vandalize anything, lol. I added information based on media sources. Perhaps you should be the one banned from editing. Kerrylaw61 ( talk) 12:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi there! Can you please let me know why my editing is removed by you. I edited on the basis of some reliable sources. You removed it. I edited some text as well without reading you removed it why it is so?? TopBlogIndia ( talk) 03:58, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
It's a reliable source I read it then I added and rest of the changes are important that's why I added it. Please read it first then edit it without read how you removed it. Pleas read it first.
I didn't ignore it I accept the editing. But I just wanted to know as a learning purpose how you find out the source is not reliable because as I said I checked the source and I find out it's reliable and they have added all the required information about that person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TopBlogIndia ( talk • contribs) 05:27, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia is also a heap of information. In Wikipedia any one can write and how that's poorly written can you please define in detail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samqx136 ( talk • contribs) 07:05, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi, 4TheWynne! I am confused as to why my edit on Gary Ablett was removed? I understand you removing the minor edits because it is unnecessary to add Ablett's individual stats during all his finals games!!! But, I added the entire 2010 AFL Season that was missing! If we have every other season detailed that he played, why would we leave out the 2010 Season!? Also, I believe that First Premiership & Individual Accolades is a better sub-heading in comparison to First Premiership & Team Success!! Mainly because Geelong did have team success in 2008, but Ablett took home a truckload of individual accolades, everything except the Brownlow which was featured in the next sub-heading!
Thank you for your feedback!!! Please, expand more next time!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by FreedomSilk34 ( talk • contribs) 03:59, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
thanks for catching that. I misread McGovney's wiki entry and was basing it on that misread. DBalling ( talk) 12:22, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Excuse me, may I ask why you consider that imdb IS NOT a reliable source?????? Because I don't understand anything. Perhaps you can be of the opinion that this character is not relevant, and I don't agree, but I don't understand what I did wrong.-- Habibicb ( talk) 14:09, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Untill he confirms his retirement he is a current AFL player without a club Gwsforlife ( talk) 23:56, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Yeah I don't appreciate being accused of disruptive editing. I was just cleaning up the first couple lines of the Metallica page. It's not like i was repeatedly trolling on the thing. Aia94 ( talk) 12:22, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
Regarding Ewan McGregor, all I did was add UK to his profile. He considered himself to be British ( see his views on Scottish independence 2014) which is another reason I added it. I really don't see why that got reverted. Scotland is part of the UK, so please explain to me why that is not valid? In documentaries and in the UN and EU, we are known as the UK. We may be seperate countries but as of now, we are not fully self-governing, so there's no reason why the word UK should be taken out, because currently this is the state that is still reported. You want citated facts on Wikipedia and that is a fact, but you've taken it out. That's kind of contradictory. I really don't agree that it is unconstructive, and I am very surprised you seem to think this is. We all have British citizenship. I don't mean to sound abrupt, but I'm taken aback that something so minor as this is considered to be factually wrong, when many citations say otherwise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MountainLaurel88 ( talk • contribs) 17:06, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Could you please explain why? I don't see why this is an issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MountainLaurel88 ( talk • contribs) 17:46, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Why do you not add UK to the info box? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MountainLaurel88 ( talk • contribs) 22:16, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
That's how it works? Sorry, but in the past, it really made no difference. Adding something like that shouldn't get removed. I don't know who came up with the rules but that is just crazy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MountainLaurel88 ( talk • contribs) 07:09, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
IM SO SCARED IM AT THE LIABARY ILL JUST GO HOME AND USE MY REAL ACOUNT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.54.176.162 ( talk) 05:31, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Linkin_Park&diff=prev&oldid=923199017 ? Why are you misusing the HTML small tag here? ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 01:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Koavf, this is not even comparable to unsourced claims. I would have thought it obvious, but my main reason for using it is to reduce size when necessary to prevent small sections/parts of the article (such as the infobox or small sections like band members sections) from being larger than they need to be; I don't just use it absent-mindedly or "because everyone else does" (though I've become very much used to it over the years). Have a look at the infoboxes of, say, tennis player articles (e.g. Rafael Nadal) – why do you think it's used there? 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 23:45, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
I don't have I citation because I don't actually have video or image proof, but NGR 715 is now in service as I rode it from Sandgate to Boondall Train stations recently (1st of November 2019, 4:45pm?) You can leave this info out if you want, but if you believe me you can add it back. If I ever see it again I will take a picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.156.141.61 ( talk) 02:34, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Sorry but I don't understand your rationale. What bit of WP:TALK supports them? Thanks. Doug Weller talk 12:16, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Midway (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the Midway (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 ( talk) 02:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
You don't need to have played all the ties. Players who have played in earlier ties count as the winners. He played the QFs and SFs, that counts to be part of the winning team. Felician Lopez didn't play the final tie in 2019, he still is part of the winning team. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hitius ( talk • contribs) 09:55, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
This is an ITF tweet
2019: @RafaelNadal
hopes to win his fifth Davis Cup with Spain 🏆
Five-time champions Spain were indebted to world number one Nadal for a virtuoso display as the 33-year-old continues his hunt for a fifth Davis Cup crown, having first lifted the title himself in 2004.
I think we can stick with 5. Hitius ( talk) 13:53, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
![]() |
AFLW Barnstar |
For work on the AFLW articles. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:35, 19 February 2019 (UTC) |
On 26 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nina Morrison, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nina Morrison was nominated for the 2019 AFL Women's Rising Star award on debut – but suffered a season-ending knee injury in training the next week? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nina Morrison. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Nina Morrison), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:02, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, the edit I made on the ...And Justice For All page was removed, however I don't think it should have been removed. ...And Justice for Jason is an edited version of the album that provides actual audio of the bass track from the album. There are several existing parts of the article that already discuss the missing bass track, and this would provide readers the ability to hear the album with the audible bass track. Elasticat ( talk) 18:07, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
I have Template:Did you know nominations/2019 AFL Women's Grand Final up for review at DYK. If you could review it, that would be great. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:32, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Joshua, please explain to me what it was that I did wrong on the Talk page of Metallica's Load? I directly quoted a passage that quoted James Hetfield and was on the main article page. If the passage that I quoted was incorrect then perhaps you should look at taking that down, no? Also, please tell me what the Talk page is for if not to foster a constructive discussion? I don't view that as vandalism. I don't know if there is an equivalent in Australia, but in the United States we have the First Amendment. Feel free to look it up if you're unfamiliar with the concept. Only fascists threaten to shut down viewpoints that they don't agree with by using censorship, banning, and book burning. Cheers! FiggazWithAttitude ( talk) 14:07, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
As I said, it was not a random quote but directly POSTED ON THE MAIN ARTICLE PAGE BY SOMEONE ELSE.
Since you ask NOW (what were you actually trying to do/achieve?) - I think that the quote by Hetfield is the first I've heard that and if anyone could expound upon it I would appreciate it. Now I'll never get that chance because you have taken it upon yourself to silence that discussion.
I'm so glad that there are people like you looking out for "countless others". Keep up the good work, you're the winner. Cheers! FiggazWithAttitude ( talk) 15:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Recently I edited on Megadeth’s page and you deleted all of it, I replaced heavy metal with thrash, I specified and included the two songs that were banned. 70.15.64.235 ( talk) 02:33, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
I didn’t “change genres to my suit my point of view” it says right in the beginning of the page that they are part of the big four *thrash* bands 70.15.64.235 ( talk) 02:58, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi 4The Wynne,
I made a couple of edits to SoG's page that were undone. I feel that they should have been left and perhaps applied to similar pages. The change of wording 'for' in place of 'after' for finals series background colours is the correct grammar. After the finals series, by definition, is after the finals and the Home & Away matches inclusive. Using the preposition 'for' limits the stats to the finals matches only. This is consistent with the use of 'for' in the first category 'Led the league for the season only'
In actual fact, the three categories for stats should be 'Home & Away Matches', 'Finals Matches' and 'Season Matches' (Both H&A and finals combined) since these are the matches which determine the AFL Premiership Season. The AFL season should not be construed to include pre-season matches, interstate matches or International Rules matches even though some of these appearances contribute to a players stats for the year as well.
As far as the background colour of the stats are concerned, Gary Ablett Jr led the league for Brownlow votes in the years when he won the Brownlow. Why wouldn't the background colour be used to reflect that achievement? Why delete the colour? I did make an observation about the possibility of winning the Brownlow with less votes than another player but this did not occur in either season when GA Jr won the medal.
Please consider re-instating the amendments that I applied.
Please consider if these amendments might be applied more generally.
Please consider changing to 'Home & Away' to describe matches for premiership points rather than the conflicted term 'Season' matches.
Appreciate your time, Malchemist ( talk) 08:14, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for responding,
You are correct that I did not understand your thoughts re the original undo. If the stats were colour coded based on the terms you suggest, then why are there three categories;
Using your logic, the final two categories are the same, so one is redundant. The inclusion of "...finals only" conflicts with the explanation as well.
As regards the background colour in the Brownlow votes column, I just applied the colour stipulated in the legend at the top of the table. It was NOT a random colour.
Applying a stated, and presumably agreed, colour is not an issue for the WikiTalk page. Maybe the wording of a confused legend is, but to my mind it is a minor grammatical edit.
However, I agree that changing/clarifying whether use of 'Home and Away' for the preliminary rounds of the season may be best addressed there, so I won't pursue that further on this page.
Thank you for your thoughts, Malchemist ( talk) 22:44, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi 4TheWynne....
I made an edit on the article for the Machine Head album Burn My Eyes. I removed alternative metal from the infobox because it was in the AllMusic genre sidebar, then you reverted my edit and left a message on my talk page saying that my edit did not have a valid reason and "does not appear to be constructive". Then I made a couple attempts to add in some genres with sources I thought were usable, but those got turned down. So why do I keep removing alternative metal? Because 1. THAT'S NOT WHAT THE ALBUM IS!! It's really groove/thrash metal, but of course those can't be added without sources, right?? If one of their albums was considered alternative metal, it would most likely be either Supercharger or Catharsis. 2. The rules about using sources clearly state in its exact words: "AllMusic's genre sidebar should be avoided. Previous discussions at WP:ALBUMS and RSN have evinced that they can be incongruous with the reviewer's prose, which should take precedent over the sidebar." I'm guessing you never read those rules clearly or you think the sidebar has some reliable potential. So rather than continuing the edit fight even further, I would suggest starting a new discussion at WP:ALBUMS and/or RSN talking about whether the AllMusic sidebar should actually be used for genres or not. If the admins agree with you and decide to use the sidebar, then you may keep the alternative metal. If the admins say no to the sidebar, then those genres are out. Please take your time to consider this. Thank you and good day.... SirZPthundergod9001 ( talk) 06:07, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Had no idea about that revert 22 hours ago A.R.M. 10:52, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello Joshua, Thank you for editing the edits I made to the Queensland Rail page, this is some of my first edits to Wikipedia so it is greatly appreciated to see people refining and generally making my work better. One thing to note on your edits though, as of yesterday (Wednesday 4/09/19) EMU 01 now residies with QR heritage at Ipswich, effectively making it part of the heritage fleet, I added this to reflect the change.
Thanks again Reef — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reef Thomspon ( talk • contribs) 04:13, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
I did not vandalize anything, lol. I added information based on media sources. Perhaps you should be the one banned from editing. Kerrylaw61 ( talk) 12:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi there! Can you please let me know why my editing is removed by you. I edited on the basis of some reliable sources. You removed it. I edited some text as well without reading you removed it why it is so?? TopBlogIndia ( talk) 03:58, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
It's a reliable source I read it then I added and rest of the changes are important that's why I added it. Please read it first then edit it without read how you removed it. Pleas read it first.
I didn't ignore it I accept the editing. But I just wanted to know as a learning purpose how you find out the source is not reliable because as I said I checked the source and I find out it's reliable and they have added all the required information about that person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TopBlogIndia ( talk • contribs) 05:27, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia is also a heap of information. In Wikipedia any one can write and how that's poorly written can you please define in detail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samqx136 ( talk • contribs) 07:05, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi, 4TheWynne! I am confused as to why my edit on Gary Ablett was removed? I understand you removing the minor edits because it is unnecessary to add Ablett's individual stats during all his finals games!!! But, I added the entire 2010 AFL Season that was missing! If we have every other season detailed that he played, why would we leave out the 2010 Season!? Also, I believe that First Premiership & Individual Accolades is a better sub-heading in comparison to First Premiership & Team Success!! Mainly because Geelong did have team success in 2008, but Ablett took home a truckload of individual accolades, everything except the Brownlow which was featured in the next sub-heading!
Thank you for your feedback!!! Please, expand more next time!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by FreedomSilk34 ( talk • contribs) 03:59, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
thanks for catching that. I misread McGovney's wiki entry and was basing it on that misread. DBalling ( talk) 12:22, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Excuse me, may I ask why you consider that imdb IS NOT a reliable source?????? Because I don't understand anything. Perhaps you can be of the opinion that this character is not relevant, and I don't agree, but I don't understand what I did wrong.-- Habibicb ( talk) 14:09, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Untill he confirms his retirement he is a current AFL player without a club Gwsforlife ( talk) 23:56, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Yeah I don't appreciate being accused of disruptive editing. I was just cleaning up the first couple lines of the Metallica page. It's not like i was repeatedly trolling on the thing. Aia94 ( talk) 12:22, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
Regarding Ewan McGregor, all I did was add UK to his profile. He considered himself to be British ( see his views on Scottish independence 2014) which is another reason I added it. I really don't see why that got reverted. Scotland is part of the UK, so please explain to me why that is not valid? In documentaries and in the UN and EU, we are known as the UK. We may be seperate countries but as of now, we are not fully self-governing, so there's no reason why the word UK should be taken out, because currently this is the state that is still reported. You want citated facts on Wikipedia and that is a fact, but you've taken it out. That's kind of contradictory. I really don't agree that it is unconstructive, and I am very surprised you seem to think this is. We all have British citizenship. I don't mean to sound abrupt, but I'm taken aback that something so minor as this is considered to be factually wrong, when many citations say otherwise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MountainLaurel88 ( talk • contribs) 17:06, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Could you please explain why? I don't see why this is an issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MountainLaurel88 ( talk • contribs) 17:46, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Why do you not add UK to the info box? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MountainLaurel88 ( talk • contribs) 22:16, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
That's how it works? Sorry, but in the past, it really made no difference. Adding something like that shouldn't get removed. I don't know who came up with the rules but that is just crazy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MountainLaurel88 ( talk • contribs) 07:09, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
IM SO SCARED IM AT THE LIABARY ILL JUST GO HOME AND USE MY REAL ACOUNT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.54.176.162 ( talk) 05:31, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Linkin_Park&diff=prev&oldid=923199017 ? Why are you misusing the HTML small tag here? ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 01:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Koavf, this is not even comparable to unsourced claims. I would have thought it obvious, but my main reason for using it is to reduce size when necessary to prevent small sections/parts of the article (such as the infobox or small sections like band members sections) from being larger than they need to be; I don't just use it absent-mindedly or "because everyone else does" (though I've become very much used to it over the years). Have a look at the infoboxes of, say, tennis player articles (e.g. Rafael Nadal) – why do you think it's used there? 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 23:45, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
I don't have I citation because I don't actually have video or image proof, but NGR 715 is now in service as I rode it from Sandgate to Boondall Train stations recently (1st of November 2019, 4:45pm?) You can leave this info out if you want, but if you believe me you can add it back. If I ever see it again I will take a picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.156.141.61 ( talk) 02:34, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Sorry but I don't understand your rationale. What bit of WP:TALK supports them? Thanks. Doug Weller talk 12:16, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Midway (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the Midway (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 ( talk) 02:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
You don't need to have played all the ties. Players who have played in earlier ties count as the winners. He played the QFs and SFs, that counts to be part of the winning team. Felician Lopez didn't play the final tie in 2019, he still is part of the winning team. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hitius ( talk • contribs) 09:55, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
This is an ITF tweet
2019: @RafaelNadal
hopes to win his fifth Davis Cup with Spain 🏆
Five-time champions Spain were indebted to world number one Nadal for a virtuoso display as the 33-year-old continues his hunt for a fifth Davis Cup crown, having first lifted the title himself in 2004.
I think we can stick with 5. Hitius ( talk) 13:53, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also: