Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! This , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. ![]() |
Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. Jo e I 02:58, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Your recent contribution(s) to Wikipedia are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! -- Madchester 17:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Quinceañera, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- ometzit<col> 02:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Lactic acid ( diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 19:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be
vandalism. Thank you.
Joe
I
03:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
15:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
17:00, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
13:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Dear
205.203.58.1,
Some of your
edits on the page
January 16 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:
If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. PseudoBot ( talk) 19:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
J-Walk Blog has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thanks.
Epbr123 (
talk)
15:45, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to
Texas A&M Aggies. If your
vandalism continues, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. →
Wordbuilder (
talk)
17:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to
1991 in country music. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be
blocked from editing.
Pontificalibus (
talk)
20:57, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Jauerback
dude?/
dude.
21:10, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make
personal attacks on other people as you did at
User talk:Daedalus969, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
tedder (
talk)
18:49, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Luby's massacre. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
CliffC (
talk)
20:24, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Hepatitis D. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Scray (
talk)
02:01, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Ojai, California with
this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
ScottyBerg (
talk)
19:12, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
W. Roy Smythe. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you! -- jbergste
(u)
(t)
(c)
17:53, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Hog maw, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.
Allens (
talk |
contribs)
22:01, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to
Peyronie's disease constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Donner60 (
talk)
21:15, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Profanity, you may be
blocked from editing.
Qwertyus (
talk)
16:44, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Jianhui67. An edit that you recently made to
Composition studies seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
Jianhui67 (
talk)
04:32, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
The Office. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Jus
da
fax
21:31, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the
Crimean War article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying
talk page. If you post your comments there, other
editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you!
Coretheapple (
talk)
23:22, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Temple, Texas. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators have the ability to
block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —
SMALL
JIM
19:41, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Gobonobo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Summertime Sadness because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
gobonobo
+
c
17:26, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Randy Johnson, you may be
blocked from editing.
Brianga (
talk)
15:26, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
List of city nicknames in Texas, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
11:50, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
I am One of Many. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Omaha, Nebraska, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
I am One of Many (
talk)
18:48, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Brian Barkley, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
21:32, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Serial killer. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Thegreatluigi (
talk)
00:36, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Serial killer.
Citizen Canine (
talk)
15:39, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ~ Amory (
u •
t •
c)
15:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Operation Anubis, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
geeoharee (
talk)
19:13, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Book of Exodus, you may be
blocked from editing. Noting that this is the second time in two weeks you've done this.
Doug Weller
talk
11:42, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at
Book of Exodus.
Denvercoder9 (
talk)
00:59, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:20, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Cross Canadian Ragweed, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.
Seawolf35 (
talk)
00:24, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! This , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. ![]() |
Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. Jo e I 02:58, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Your recent contribution(s) to Wikipedia are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! -- Madchester 17:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Quinceañera, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- ometzit<col> 02:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Lactic acid ( diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 19:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be
vandalism. Thank you.
Joe
I
03:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
15:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
17:00, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
13:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Dear
205.203.58.1,
Some of your
edits on the page
January 16 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:
If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. PseudoBot ( talk) 19:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
J-Walk Blog has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thanks.
Epbr123 (
talk)
15:45, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to
Texas A&M Aggies. If your
vandalism continues, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. →
Wordbuilder (
talk)
17:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to
1991 in country music. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be
blocked from editing.
Pontificalibus (
talk)
20:57, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Jauerback
dude?/
dude.
21:10, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make
personal attacks on other people as you did at
User talk:Daedalus969, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
tedder (
talk)
18:49, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Luby's massacre. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
CliffC (
talk)
20:24, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Hepatitis D. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Scray (
talk)
02:01, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Ojai, California with
this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
ScottyBerg (
talk)
19:12, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
W. Roy Smythe. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you! -- jbergste
(u)
(t)
(c)
17:53, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Hog maw, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.
Allens (
talk |
contribs)
22:01, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to
Peyronie's disease constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Donner60 (
talk)
21:15, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Profanity, you may be
blocked from editing.
Qwertyus (
talk)
16:44, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Jianhui67. An edit that you recently made to
Composition studies seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
Jianhui67 (
talk)
04:32, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
The Office. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Jus
da
fax
21:31, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the
Crimean War article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying
talk page. If you post your comments there, other
editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you!
Coretheapple (
talk)
23:22, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Temple, Texas. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators have the ability to
block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —
SMALL
JIM
19:41, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Gobonobo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Summertime Sadness because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
gobonobo
+
c
17:26, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Randy Johnson, you may be
blocked from editing.
Brianga (
talk)
15:26, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
List of city nicknames in Texas, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
11:50, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
I am One of Many. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Omaha, Nebraska, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
I am One of Many (
talk)
18:48, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Brian Barkley, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
21:32, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Serial killer. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Thegreatluigi (
talk)
00:36, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Serial killer.
Citizen Canine (
talk)
15:39, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ~ Amory (
u •
t •
c)
15:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Operation Anubis, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
geeoharee (
talk)
19:13, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Book of Exodus, you may be
blocked from editing. Noting that this is the second time in two weeks you've done this.
Doug Weller
talk
11:42, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at
Book of Exodus.
Denvercoder9 (
talk)
00:59, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:20, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Cross Canadian Ragweed, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.
Seawolf35 (
talk)
00:24, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |