Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (110.20.234.69) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on this page. Again, welcome!
I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{
Talkback}} message on
my talk page. @
02:25, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for your work in the Yaoi article. Two of the ref names you added are "McLelland_2000_136" and "Nagaike03" which don't exist. Could you add the ref's or correct the ref names? Otherwise, the tags will have to be reverted back to {{ Citation needed}}. Thanks, Kirin13 ( talk) 05:10, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi there.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.-- 220 of Borg 09:42, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
220 of Borg 10:29, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
I have answered your last query on my talk page. You may find you can edit that page now. --
220
of
Borg
11:56, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
For helping to copyedit, make, and Edit Request, improvements to the highly visible article,
2014 Sydney hostage crisis, despite sometimes being unable to edit it due to page protection. (Possibly for taking my advice too! ![]() - 220 of Borg 05:24, 16 December 2014 (UTC) |
It is entirely appropriate to remove redlinks where it appears that an article is unlikely. I eventually found your draft for the subject. Next time, it will be much less antagonistic if you just say you're working on a draft. Thanks.-- Jeffro77 ( talk) 14:34, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Great work on the Bail article. It is a much needed complement to the hostage one and difficult to do. And thanks for the barnstar! Whiteghost.ink ( talk) 08:34, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! 110.20.234.69,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
B E C K Y S A Y L E S
06:15, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
|
Hello! Your submission of
Bail Act 2013 at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Iselilja (
talk)
17:31, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 02:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 2 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bail Act 2013, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the New South Wales Bail Act includes an "unacceptable risk" test? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bail Act 2013. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:02, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Huon ( talk) 23:16, 3 March 2015 (UTC) Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Good work
,
here. -
220
of
Borg
06:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
“ | He did hold a security guard licence from 1997 to 2000 which would have allowed him to carry a pistol while on duty from March to June 1997. Relevant laws were subsequently changed and from 1 July 1997, Monis would have no longer been able to carry a pistol in his capacity as a security guard. (my italics). | ” |
@ 220 of Borg:
Seems so - like no-one had the full story on this guy. (Probably not helped by the multiple names he used...) The review even seems to miss out on the dates he was married to Noleen Hayson Pal for. I'm a bit confused as to where we could put the 2012 refusal of security guard license in his article - it doesn't seem to fit under any of the section headings in his 'life in Australia'? -- 110.20.234.69 ( talk) 06:59, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- "il utilise sa bonne mine et la bonne éducation reçue pour faire illusion". Massei-Chamayou(p.329) le range, avec Willoughby, parmi les chasseurs de dot et cite dans P&P (ch 46) ce qu'en dit Elizabeth : "He has every charms of personn and adress that can captivate a woman"
- "Il a des défauts beaucoup plus graves que les autres mauvais garçons des autres romans". Massei-Chamayou(p.345) le traite d'anti-héros au comportement résumé par un adjectif qui fusionne son rapport à l'argent et à la sexualité", l'adjectif profligate (dans le double sens de prodigue et libertin)
- "redoutable manipulateur du langage" peut être sourcé par Linda Hall "Master of conversation"
- "il est aussi le seul qui joue imprudemment gros jeu" Massei-Chamayou(p.346) signale que tous sont des dépensiers impénitents, mais si JA choisit de faire de Wickham un joueur impénitent (a gamester), pour elle, cela veut dire qu'il est "peu sensible aux notions de responsabilité et respectabilité". Pour Linda Hall il est "The man who can be bought" (188)
- "et il tourne plus mal qu'eux": Linda Hall (190) signale que Willoughby finit riche ("and found domestic felicity"), Franck Churchill "gets everything he wants", mais Wickham "is not so fortunate" Vous trouverez peut-être aussi de quoi sourcer sa calomnie chez
Margie Burns.-
Eymery (
talk)
23:43, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Timeline of yaoi, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:36, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Some remarks written today (er... yesterday, now) by
Azurfrog,
here about Submission declined on 24 May 2015 by
Tikuko. An administrator on fr.WP, he leads and advises me since 2009. He wrote, about
Draft:George Wickham :
Je pense que l'annotateur se laisse entrainer par sa propre vision non neutre, non factuelle de ce qu'est un essai et un travail inédit (OR). C'est vrai que l'article fait appel à pas mal de termes louangeurs, mais sans qu'on puisse de mon avis parler de « non neutralité » ; quant au travail inédit, encore faudrait-il que notre critique se soit donné la peine d'identifier les passages qui pourraient être qualifiés de « synthèse inédite des sources citées »...
Maintenant, ce que je pense, c'est que l'article paie un peu le fait d'être écrit par une IP, qui n'a pas le crédit suffisant pour faire admettre ce type de rédaction moins dépouillée qu'il n'est d'usage sur en:WP, alors qu'ici (i.e. sur fr:WP), chacun sait que tes articles reflètent scrupuleusement les sources, même si tu as su « lier la sauce » par une rédaction plus soutenue.
Drafts correspond à nos pages de brouillon, proposées en relecture sur
fr:Wikipédia:Forum des nouveaux/relecture. Mais, pour y être intervenu un certain nombre de fois, je peux te dire qu'un article comme
George Wickham y serait salué par de chaleureux encouragements et des félicitations sincères, pas par cette critique assez gratuite et non constructive mettant en cause le manque de neutralité et la présence non démontrée de travail inédit : la pauvre IP qui a traduit l'article se retrouve bizutée par un ancien qui semble jouer un peu trop les gros bras... On est assez loin de
Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers. Have a nice week-end ! –
Eymery (
talk)
23:17, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello there!. From Azurfrog on my fr.wk user talk, today at 10.43. He says some remarks very alike my own:
Je reviens sur l'affaire de l'article sur George Wickham en anglais, qui me semble au point mort et que je trouve vraiment assez effarante :
De façon générale, la WP anglophone est plus tolérante que la WP francophone, plus technique aussi (donc, en sens inverse moins accommodante lorsque les recommandations, les guidelines ne sont pas respectées). Elle est notamment plus tolérante vis-à-vis des tentatives d'auto-promotion (c'est ce que je lui reproche d'abord et avant tout), comptant sur la force de frappe d'un nombre astronomique de contributeurs pour débarrasser rapidement les articles de leurs aspects promotionnels, tout en en développant les aspects encyclopédiques.
Mais ici, c'est le monde à l'envers : on a un article sans aucun problème fondamental, avec au contraire des qualités encyclopédiques évidentes, « emprisonné » dans l'espace Draft où il semble soumis au bon vouloir d'un seul, qui ne s'est même pas donné la peine d'identifier clairement ses critiques !
C'est ça qu'il faut casser : en retirant de l'article tout ce qui peut sembler contrevenir aux guidelines, on accule le « gardien » de l'article, soit à en accepter le passage dans l'espace encyclopédique où il vivra sa vie, soit à se retrouver contesté publiquement (j'ai parlé de la « water pump », mais la possibilité d' un recours devant les administrateurs de la WP anglophone existe aussi, en mettant en avant la violation de WP:DON'T BITE).
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Arthur goes shopping ( talk) 10:45, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
If you edit without an account, your IP address (110.20.234.69) is used to identify you instead.
We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and
create an account. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on this page. We also have an
intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to
sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).
Happy editing! —ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 03:40, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for edit request for Tasmanian Devil. Special appreciation for information on where to put it and for the proper formatting. I would highly recommend that you sign up for an account, as you clearly know what you are doing. It will also help reduce the burden on other editors from cross-checking the information you provide. Of course, I understand the reasons why you may not wish to sign up and in that case, thank you for continuing to support Wikipedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page or you can reply below since I will now watch this page. Inomyabcs ( talk) 09:53, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Well, I'll just keep plugging away at them a bit at a time. Thanks for the heads-up. Thnidu ( talk) 16:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
@ Thnidu:, thanks for that. -- 110.20.234.69 ( talk) 22:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Watching the show, thanks for your work on the article so far! :) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 09:48, 14 September 2015 (UTC) |
I've been on WP for nearly 10 years but never before until now has my watchlist asked me to review and approve article changes by anonymous IP accounts. I've apparently reviewed/approved your changes for Joe Hockey. Would you be willing to do both of us a favour and create an account considering your high contribution level? If you're trying to hide your identity, signing up for a username won't compromise that, but will give benefits to the both of us! Timeshift ( talk) 08:00, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
It's a new system, it'll take time to get used to it. -- 110.20.234.69 ( talk) 23:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:19, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Timeline of yaoi, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:37, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, 110.20.234.69. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " Timeline of yaoi".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 09:35, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bail Act 1978, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (110.20.234.69) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on this page. Again, welcome!
I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{
Talkback}} message on
my talk page. @
02:25, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for your work in the Yaoi article. Two of the ref names you added are "McLelland_2000_136" and "Nagaike03" which don't exist. Could you add the ref's or correct the ref names? Otherwise, the tags will have to be reverted back to {{ Citation needed}}. Thanks, Kirin13 ( talk) 05:10, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi there.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.-- 220 of Borg 09:42, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
220 of Borg 10:29, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
I have answered your last query on my talk page. You may find you can edit that page now. --
220
of
Borg
11:56, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
For helping to copyedit, make, and Edit Request, improvements to the highly visible article,
2014 Sydney hostage crisis, despite sometimes being unable to edit it due to page protection. (Possibly for taking my advice too! ![]() - 220 of Borg 05:24, 16 December 2014 (UTC) |
It is entirely appropriate to remove redlinks where it appears that an article is unlikely. I eventually found your draft for the subject. Next time, it will be much less antagonistic if you just say you're working on a draft. Thanks.-- Jeffro77 ( talk) 14:34, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Great work on the Bail article. It is a much needed complement to the hostage one and difficult to do. And thanks for the barnstar! Whiteghost.ink ( talk) 08:34, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! 110.20.234.69,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
B E C K Y S A Y L E S
06:15, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
|
Hello! Your submission of
Bail Act 2013 at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Iselilja (
talk)
17:31, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 02:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 2 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bail Act 2013, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the New South Wales Bail Act includes an "unacceptable risk" test? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bail Act 2013. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:02, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Huon ( talk) 23:16, 3 March 2015 (UTC) Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Good work
,
here. -
220
of
Borg
06:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
“ | He did hold a security guard licence from 1997 to 2000 which would have allowed him to carry a pistol while on duty from March to June 1997. Relevant laws were subsequently changed and from 1 July 1997, Monis would have no longer been able to carry a pistol in his capacity as a security guard. (my italics). | ” |
@ 220 of Borg:
Seems so - like no-one had the full story on this guy. (Probably not helped by the multiple names he used...) The review even seems to miss out on the dates he was married to Noleen Hayson Pal for. I'm a bit confused as to where we could put the 2012 refusal of security guard license in his article - it doesn't seem to fit under any of the section headings in his 'life in Australia'? -- 110.20.234.69 ( talk) 06:59, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- "il utilise sa bonne mine et la bonne éducation reçue pour faire illusion". Massei-Chamayou(p.329) le range, avec Willoughby, parmi les chasseurs de dot et cite dans P&P (ch 46) ce qu'en dit Elizabeth : "He has every charms of personn and adress that can captivate a woman"
- "Il a des défauts beaucoup plus graves que les autres mauvais garçons des autres romans". Massei-Chamayou(p.345) le traite d'anti-héros au comportement résumé par un adjectif qui fusionne son rapport à l'argent et à la sexualité", l'adjectif profligate (dans le double sens de prodigue et libertin)
- "redoutable manipulateur du langage" peut être sourcé par Linda Hall "Master of conversation"
- "il est aussi le seul qui joue imprudemment gros jeu" Massei-Chamayou(p.346) signale que tous sont des dépensiers impénitents, mais si JA choisit de faire de Wickham un joueur impénitent (a gamester), pour elle, cela veut dire qu'il est "peu sensible aux notions de responsabilité et respectabilité". Pour Linda Hall il est "The man who can be bought" (188)
- "et il tourne plus mal qu'eux": Linda Hall (190) signale que Willoughby finit riche ("and found domestic felicity"), Franck Churchill "gets everything he wants", mais Wickham "is not so fortunate" Vous trouverez peut-être aussi de quoi sourcer sa calomnie chez
Margie Burns.-
Eymery (
talk)
23:43, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Timeline of yaoi, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:36, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Some remarks written today (er... yesterday, now) by
Azurfrog,
here about Submission declined on 24 May 2015 by
Tikuko. An administrator on fr.WP, he leads and advises me since 2009. He wrote, about
Draft:George Wickham :
Je pense que l'annotateur se laisse entrainer par sa propre vision non neutre, non factuelle de ce qu'est un essai et un travail inédit (OR). C'est vrai que l'article fait appel à pas mal de termes louangeurs, mais sans qu'on puisse de mon avis parler de « non neutralité » ; quant au travail inédit, encore faudrait-il que notre critique se soit donné la peine d'identifier les passages qui pourraient être qualifiés de « synthèse inédite des sources citées »...
Maintenant, ce que je pense, c'est que l'article paie un peu le fait d'être écrit par une IP, qui n'a pas le crédit suffisant pour faire admettre ce type de rédaction moins dépouillée qu'il n'est d'usage sur en:WP, alors qu'ici (i.e. sur fr:WP), chacun sait que tes articles reflètent scrupuleusement les sources, même si tu as su « lier la sauce » par une rédaction plus soutenue.
Drafts correspond à nos pages de brouillon, proposées en relecture sur
fr:Wikipédia:Forum des nouveaux/relecture. Mais, pour y être intervenu un certain nombre de fois, je peux te dire qu'un article comme
George Wickham y serait salué par de chaleureux encouragements et des félicitations sincères, pas par cette critique assez gratuite et non constructive mettant en cause le manque de neutralité et la présence non démontrée de travail inédit : la pauvre IP qui a traduit l'article se retrouve bizutée par un ancien qui semble jouer un peu trop les gros bras... On est assez loin de
Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers. Have a nice week-end ! –
Eymery (
talk)
23:17, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello there!. From Azurfrog on my fr.wk user talk, today at 10.43. He says some remarks very alike my own:
Je reviens sur l'affaire de l'article sur George Wickham en anglais, qui me semble au point mort et que je trouve vraiment assez effarante :
De façon générale, la WP anglophone est plus tolérante que la WP francophone, plus technique aussi (donc, en sens inverse moins accommodante lorsque les recommandations, les guidelines ne sont pas respectées). Elle est notamment plus tolérante vis-à-vis des tentatives d'auto-promotion (c'est ce que je lui reproche d'abord et avant tout), comptant sur la force de frappe d'un nombre astronomique de contributeurs pour débarrasser rapidement les articles de leurs aspects promotionnels, tout en en développant les aspects encyclopédiques.
Mais ici, c'est le monde à l'envers : on a un article sans aucun problème fondamental, avec au contraire des qualités encyclopédiques évidentes, « emprisonné » dans l'espace Draft où il semble soumis au bon vouloir d'un seul, qui ne s'est même pas donné la peine d'identifier clairement ses critiques !
C'est ça qu'il faut casser : en retirant de l'article tout ce qui peut sembler contrevenir aux guidelines, on accule le « gardien » de l'article, soit à en accepter le passage dans l'espace encyclopédique où il vivra sa vie, soit à se retrouver contesté publiquement (j'ai parlé de la « water pump », mais la possibilité d' un recours devant les administrateurs de la WP anglophone existe aussi, en mettant en avant la violation de WP:DON'T BITE).
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Arthur goes shopping ( talk) 10:45, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
If you edit without an account, your IP address (110.20.234.69) is used to identify you instead.
We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and
create an account. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on this page. We also have an
intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to
sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).
Happy editing! —ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 03:40, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for edit request for Tasmanian Devil. Special appreciation for information on where to put it and for the proper formatting. I would highly recommend that you sign up for an account, as you clearly know what you are doing. It will also help reduce the burden on other editors from cross-checking the information you provide. Of course, I understand the reasons why you may not wish to sign up and in that case, thank you for continuing to support Wikipedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page or you can reply below since I will now watch this page. Inomyabcs ( talk) 09:53, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Well, I'll just keep plugging away at them a bit at a time. Thanks for the heads-up. Thnidu ( talk) 16:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
@ Thnidu:, thanks for that. -- 110.20.234.69 ( talk) 22:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Watching the show, thanks for your work on the article so far! :) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 09:48, 14 September 2015 (UTC) |
I've been on WP for nearly 10 years but never before until now has my watchlist asked me to review and approve article changes by anonymous IP accounts. I've apparently reviewed/approved your changes for Joe Hockey. Would you be willing to do both of us a favour and create an account considering your high contribution level? If you're trying to hide your identity, signing up for a username won't compromise that, but will give benefits to the both of us! Timeshift ( talk) 08:00, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
It's a new system, it'll take time to get used to it. -- 110.20.234.69 ( talk) 23:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:19, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Timeline of yaoi, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:37, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, 110.20.234.69. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " Timeline of yaoi".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 09:35, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bail Act 1978, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |