Reason: Fictional character that fails
WP:GNG,
WP:NFICTION. Pure
WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not an in-universe fictional biography summary. Could be soft deleted by redirecting to
List of Forgotten Realms deities.
Reason: Fictional object. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure
WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails
WP:PLOT,
WP:GNG,
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary.
Reason: Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure
WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails
WP:PLOT,
WP:GNG,
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary.
Reason: Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure
WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails
WP:PLOT,
WP:GNG,
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary.
Reason: Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure
WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails
WP:PLOT,
WP:GNG,
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary.
Reason: Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure
WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails
WP:PLOT,
WP:GNG,
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary.
Reason: Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure
WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails
WP:PLOT,
WP:GNG,
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary.
Reason: Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure
WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails
WP:PLOT,
WP:GNG,
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary.
Reason: No indication this fictional location passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to show anything that's not a mention in passing/fictional bio summary.
Reason: No indication this fictional location passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to show anything that's not a mention in passing/fictional bio summary.
Reason: Fictional concept "never explained in detail" (sigh - but hey, we can do what the primary sources couldn't, right?). No evidence of notability. BEFORE fails to find any in-depth coverage outside primary sources.
Reason: No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT+
WP:OR.
Reason: No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT+
WP:OR.
Reason: No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT+
WP:OR.
Reason: No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT+
WP:OR.
Reason: No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT+
WP:OR.
Reason: No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT+
WP:OR.
Reason: No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT+
WP:OR.
Reason: No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT+
WP:OR.
Reason: No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT+
WP:OR.
Reason: No evidence this fictional organization passes
WP:GNG,
WP:NFICTION and like. BEFORE fails to find anything that is not an in-universe
WP:PLOT summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Local travel agency with coverage limited to primary sources (own website and like) and press releases about business as usual. Fails
WP:NCORP.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: How is this comic book location notable? Sources are the usual PRMARY for PLOT, plus list of appearances in media. It was also made into two or three toy sets. Nothing here seems sufficient to warrant a stand-alone article?
Reason: How is this comic book location notable? Sources are the usual PRMARY for PLOT, plus list of appearances in media. Nothing here seems sufficient to warrant a stand-alone article?
Reason: How is this comic book location notable? Sources are the usual PRMARY for PLOT, plus list of appearances in media. Nothing here seems sufficient to warrant a stand-alone article?
Reason: A very minor location in Tolkienverse (Silmarillion). Could redirect to that book or to
Middle-Earth#Geography. Fails GNG/NFICTION/PLOT. Sources are just PRIMARY.
Reason: Seems to fail GNG/NFICTION. Pure plot. Can be soft deleted by redirecting to
Ooze (Dungeons & Dragons) instead of regular deletion. Nothing to merge since it's all plot, no analysis.
Reason: Seems to fail GNG/NFICTION. Pure plot. Can be soft deleted by redirecting to
Ooze (Dungeons & Dragons) instead of regular deletion. Nothing to merge since it's all plot, no analysis.
Reason: Seems to fail GNG/NFICTION. Pure plot. Can be soft deleted by redirecting to
Ooze (Dungeons & Dragons) instead of regular deletion. Nothing to merge since it's all plot, no analysis.
Reason: Seems to fail GNG/NFICTION. Pure plot with PRIMARY sourcing outside one minor list of d&d monsters and a single list inclusion is a far cry from GNG requirements.
Reason: Fictional race that fails WP:NFICTION, WP:GNG and WP:PLOT. BEFORE does not show any analysis, only in-universe style summaries plus a list of appearances in other media. The article contains likely OR.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:GNG/
WP:NCOMPNAY. Refs are mentions in passing/press releases/business as usual PR "notice us" reports.
WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES.
Reason: What makes this product (phone) notable? I couldn't find any review in an outlet that seems reliable and not just blog advert or a rewritten press releases. Fails
WP:GNG (also similar situation to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivo V2).
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:GNG/
WP:NCOMPANY. It sold and serviced an old computer that is notable.. rather extreme failure of
WP:NOTINHERITED?
Reason: No evidence this company passes WP:GNG/WP:NCOMPANY. Sources/coverage seem limited to pess releases and like, no awards, etc. Just business as usual.
WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES
Reason: Seems to fail
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Two notable owners resulted in decline of A7, but
WP:NOTINHERITED. Could redirect to Asustek as the majority holder, perhaps, if one thinks it is a plausible search term?
Reason: No evidence this passes GNG/
WP:NCOMPANY. Developer of one possibly notable piece of soft (
WP:NOTINHERITED). Perhaps soft delete by redirecting to
Cirquent?
Reason: No evidence this passes
Wikipedia:Notability (software). Reference link 1 is to a search that produces no results, and link 2 seems to show an old ad.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional plot summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional plot summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional plot summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional plot summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional plot summary.
Reason: Does not seem to meet NCOMPANY/GNG. Refs limited to press-releases, their rewrites, and routine reports. BEFORE does not show anything much better. No awards, no in-depth analysis or coverage that's not paid for.
Reason: Does not seem to pass GNG/NCOMPANY. Being second biggest XYZ in Fooland is not relevant. No evidence of in-depth coverage outside press releases and routine business reports. Few mentions in passing.
WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES.
Reason: Fails NCOMPANY/GNG. BEFORE does not show anything beyond mentions in passing and press releases or their rewrites. Could soft del and redirect to
South African Post Office?
Reason: Seems to fail GNG/
WP:NSOFTWARE. Second reference in the article is not a review, just mention in passing. BEFORE only found one more low quality review (
[1]). I don't think that's enough.
Reason: Unreliable sources used, books search fails to find a single hit for this, google search shows primarily wiki mirrors. Fails
WP:GNG, possible hoax or super niche non-notable jargon.
Reason: No evidence this subsidiary passes
WP:NCOMPANY. Redirecting to parent company
Unilever is an option, but are such subsidiaries likely searchable terms?
Reason: No evidence this fictional character passes GNG/NFICTION. No in-depth sources, no reception section, no analysis, pure WP:PLOT/appearances in media.
Reason: No evidence this fictional character passes GNG/NFICTION. No reception outside an interview on a blog, and BEFORE shows only mentions in passing on fan pages and like.
Reason: Fails GNG.
WP:OR concerns. BEFPRE search shows here is a portrait of that name, but this unreferenced article has little connection, [[WP:TNT] level anyway.
Reason: No evidence this fictional character passes
WP:NFICTION/GNG. Some mentions of queen Peronella in 19th century texts, no analysis or such.
WP:TNT in any case, given this article doesn't even attribute the fictional work she originate from.
Reason: No evidence this software passes
WP:NSOFT/GNG. No references, no reviews, etc. (Also not seeing any in my BEFORE through there are some mentions in passing).
Reason: No evidence this character passes NFICTION/GNG. One local news piece (cited) is the best coverage, then there are few mentions in blogs and worse.
Reason: No evidence this radio program passes
WP:NMEDIA/GNG.
Clearly based on a faulty
WP:BEFORE. A proper one should have made it clear that there is a reasonable target for a mergeThe Bannertalk 12:26, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Reason: No evidence of passing
WP:GNG/NBIO. Claim (unreferenced, presumed general ref is broken) of being one of the richest people and little besides that. Not seeing any in-depth coverage in my BEFORE.
Reason: Not seeing any source that discusses this character for more then a single sentence. Mentions are in passing and generally
WP:PLOT summaries. Seems to fail GNG/NFICTION.
Reason: No evidence this fictional character passes
WP:NFICTION/GNG. At present, all references are PRIMARY. BEFORE shows some plot summaries and such, but no analysis that goes beyond that.
Reason: No evidence of passing
WP:NFICTION/GNG. Plot summary + list of appearances in media. No discussion of reception/significance. BEFORE fails to show better sources (but maybe they exist in Japanese? Unfortunately ja wiki entry on this is even more barebone than ours).
Reason: Niche neologism / jargon used in very few sources. GSCholar/Books show only a few publications using it, not much more on google (bunch of Wikipedia mirrors). Term / concept seems to fail
WP:NSOFTWARE/GNG.
Reason: No evidence of passing
WP:GNG/
WP:NBIO. No inline references so a possible
WP:BLP issue. No sv interwiki to expand from. BEFORE does not show any in-depth coverage (if you deprod this, please add at least two in-depth independent sources about the subject as required by GNG).
Reason: No evidence the subject passes
WP:NBIO/GNG. No in-depth coverage found. Sources are either in passing or not independent (press releases) and usually both anyway.
Reason: Complete unreferenced. BEFORE shows mentions in passing and some plot summaries. I am not seeing any work that has analyzed the significance of this fictional reception or such. Fails
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. I am supportive of any SOFTDELETE/PRESERVE to some list of fictional locations, but there is nothing to merge (given zero references).
Reason: No evidence of notability (fails
WP:GNG/
WP:NCOMPANY). BEFOFE fails to show any useful coverage. Name might be mispelled (Verrerie ode Brehat?).
Reason: Seems to fail
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Not seeing anything outside press releases and their rewrites, generally just few mentions in passing. Can possibly consider SOFTDELETE and redirect to
FK Teteks. No referenced content to merge.
Reason: No evidence this passes GNG/
WP:NCOMPANY. BEFORE shows few mentions in passing/press-releases. Not seeing any good redirect target (just redirecting to Coca-Cola seems unhelpful since there is nothing to merge (no referenced content) and no need for the article about CC to mention this minor bottler.
Reason: No evidence this fictional topic is notable (fails
WP:NFICTION/GNG). No referenced non-
WP:PLOT content to merge. Could redirect to
Peter_Duck#Plot_summary but how plausible is this for a search term?
Reason: No evidence this fictional entity passes
WP:NFICTION/GNG. No referenced target to merge. No singular good redirect target (topic briefly mentioned in several works of fiction).
Reason: Fictional topic that fails
WP:NFICTION. No referenced content to merge. Can redirect to
Sword of Honour but concern remains whether it is a plausible search term.
Reason: Likely fail at
WP:NBIO. Sources cited are: a press release, a self-written biography blurb and a blog. BEFORE does not show any in-depth coverage that's reliable and independent of the subject.
Reason: Major notability concerns. Sources about the subject seem to fail requirements for NBIO/GNG, they are either in passing, rewritten press-releases, or
WP:INTERVIEWS.
Reason: Digital-only radio channel that existed for presumably few years, maybe 10+? Fails
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Sv wiki article is even less complete than this. Unreferenced, both of them.
Reason: No evidence this fictional creature is notable (fails GNG/NFICTION). The article is pure
WP:PLOT with primary sources. Effectively a
WP:DICTDEF too.
Reason: Not seeing significant coverage, few mentions in passing, some on social media. Seems to fail
WP:NORG/GNG. Possibly the related book is notable, and this could redirect there, but nobody created the article about the book yet.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. BEFORE shows only few mentions in passing, primarily routine press releases (mergers, acquisitions, etc.). No in-depth coverage. Non news/PR coverage is limited to single in-passing mention in minor scholarly article (
[2]) which does not discuss it in depth, just acknowledges its existence in passing. I don't think that's enough.
Reason: No evidence of passing
WP:NORG/GNG. BEFORE does not show any in-depth coverage, few mentions in passing at most. No referenced content to merge. No good redirect target (it is not mentioned in any other article outside of a 'see also'), so it fails
WP:R#PLA.
Reason: No evidence of passing
WP:NORG/GNG. BEFORE does not show any in-depth coverage, few mentions in passing at most. Note: it is a publisher, so it does get a good amount of google hits. But there is no in-depth coverage, or even in passing, all I see are citations to it plus
WP:SPS publications. No referenced content to merge. No good redirect target (it is not mentioned in any other article), so it fails
WP:R#PLA.
Reason: Not seeing what makes this company pass
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. BEFORE shows only press releases, their rewrites and mentions in passing. No valid merge or redirect target.
Reason: Not seeing what makes him pass
WP:GNG/
WP:NBIO. BEFORE does not show any in-depth coverage, a few mentions in passing (warning: there are other notable individuals with the same name, so googlehit is overinflated!).
Reason: Seems to fail
WP:NBIO/GNG (also some
WP:BLP issues). Coverage is in passing, nothing in-depth, I am not seeing a single article about him. He is often mentioned as a major donor, but coverage in such cases ranges from one sentences to a generic paragraph bio-blurb likely submitted by his staff. There is some recent coverage about a solicitation charge, but it raises BLP issues, plus
WP:ONEEVENT. No valid redirect/merge target. He seems to keep a relatively low media profile...
Reason: Not seeing what makes this obscure card game notable. I found one not very reliable review in Internet Archive. BGG page shows no evidence of any impact. No awards, no reviews. This product (game) does not seem to pass
WP:GNG.
Reason: I am not seeing any references for this, not even in passing. There are some google hits but they seem to be about the general usage of the word alternation, not about a game named thus. There is such a solitaire variant, at least there are some online versions of it, but nothing goes beyond basic rules and 'play this here' type of pages. I am not seeing any in-depth, independent coverage. As such, the topic seems to fail
WP:GNG, also
WP:V and
WP:OR are an issue. Not seeing a good redirect target and there is no referenced content to merge.
Reason: No evidence of passing GNG/NBIO. Few passing mentions on the web, no substantial in-depth coverage. Was just deleted from pl wiki as neither my BEFORE nor anyone elses where able to find sources to suggest he passes NBIO or such (
[3]).
Reason: This minor religious observation does not appear to be notable. Source cited is unreliable (self-published by minor Polish religious congregation related to the
Slavic Native Faith which invented this festival). Search for Polish sources yields nothing except blogs and related low quality websites all linked to this religious movement.
Reason: Unreferenced. Fails
WP:GNG/
WP:NBOOK. Not seeing any reliable reviews or in-depth discussion in my BEFORE, few mentions in passing on blogs/forums and such. Not mentioned at
Goodman Games so fails
WP:R#ASTONISH test for redirecting. Nothing referenced to merge to make a mention (adding unreferenced mention is a
WP:V issue).
Reason: Unreferenced. No evidence this product passes
WP:GNG. BEFORE does not show anything but mentions in unreliable bee rating sites/blogs. No valid redirect/merge target.
Reason: No evidence this product passes
WP:GNG. BEFORE does not show anything but mentions in unreliable bee rating sites/blogs. No valid redirect/merge target.
Reason: No evidence this product passes
WP:GNG. BEFORE does not show anything but mentions in unreliable bee rating sites/blogs. No valid redirect/merge target.
Reason: Unreferenced incomplete list of two brands of Argentinian beer. Does not contain a single prose sentence of text. Very early draft not even a stub. Not ready for mainspace.
Reason: No evidence this product passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. BEFORE does not show anything but mentions in passing. No valid redirect/merge target (not mentioned in any article outside see also section; no referenced content to merge, redirect to Heineken goes against
WP:R#ASTONISH).
Reason: Not seeing what makes him notable (likely fail of
WP:NBIO). Sources are very poor - few mentions in passing in family tree, company websites, and such. BEFORE shows very little (don't confuse him with his father
Thomas Cobbold (1680–1752) that gets a little bit more coverage and has borderline notability).
Reason: Unreferenced, problematic notability. Not seeing anything in sources that is not a simple
WP:DICTDEF (regional name for a pub). No valid merge/redirect target.
Reason: Seems to fail GNG/
WP:NBOOK. BEFORE shows only blog/forum reviews. No independently referenced content to merge. Please do not confuse with a more notable RPG system "Empire of the Petal Throne" from 1975 when counting your google hits :)
Reason: Likely fail of GNG/NBOOK. Super obscure topic that has people wondering if Wikipedia article is a hoax (
[4]). No evidence that any source contains any in-depth coverage of this game.
Reason: No evidence of notability, not seeing anything outside promotional materials and unreliable user (drinker...) reviews. No referenced content to merge.
Reason: No evidence this database passes
WP:GNG. No referenced content to merge. Redirect to
Sustainable Development Online fails
WP:R#ASTONISH as the target page does not even mention this database.
Reason: I don't see how this biography meets
WP:CRIMINAL/GNG. Few mentions in media limited to
WP:ONEVENT. No valid merge/redirect target. Mention on the
List of serial killers in the United States seems sufficient. Not every serial killer is notable (particularly given his 3 victims, the minimum amount require to get classified as a sk).
Reason: Not seeing what makes him notable (failure of
WP:GNG/
WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE). BEFORE does not show a single in-depth source, just few mentions in passing, and a CV-like entry at
[5] that is likely not independent of the subject. Ford-fan wikia does not have anything more (
[6]) but could in fact benefit from transwiki copy from us before deletion. A merger to
Ford Motor Company would be problematic as that article does not have a section on employees, and it would look out of place (and clearly, can't even title such section 'notable employees'). Not every higher level executive is notable.
Reason: No evidence the subject passes
WP:GNG. BEFORE shows only a few mentions in passing. The
[7] article does not seem to be about the same concept but about a different "minet" concept. No referenced content to merge, no valid redirect target per
WP:R#ASTONISH.
Reason: No evidence of this fictional race passing
WP:NFICTION/GNG. Appear only in 2-3 novels. BEFORE fails to find any in-depth discussion of this race in any work. This article is pure
WP:PLOT and BEFORE shows only few passing mentions that are also pure plot.
Reason: Fails
WP:NBOOK/GNG. Unpublished, will never be written, just a title speculation. No valid redirect target, no referenced content to merge anywhere since the content here is not even about the said book. BEFORE shows no useful references, even fan wiki has just a tiny speculative stub (
[8]).
Reason: No evidence this concept is discussed in scientific publications, it is a fan invention and BEFORE shows its discussion is limited to unreliable websites/blogs/forums. Just 'playing with moth' concept that fails
WP:GNG.
Reason: Fictional character that fails
WP:GNG,
WP:NFICTION. Pure
WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not an in-universe fictional biography summary. Could be soft deleted by redirecting to
List of Forgotten Realms deities.
Reason: Fictional object. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure
WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails
WP:PLOT,
WP:GNG,
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary.
Reason: Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure
WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails
WP:PLOT,
WP:GNG,
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary.
Reason: Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure
WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails
WP:PLOT,
WP:GNG,
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary.
Reason: Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure
WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails
WP:PLOT,
WP:GNG,
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary.
Reason: Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure
WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails
WP:PLOT,
WP:GNG,
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary.
Reason: Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure
WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails
WP:PLOT,
WP:GNG,
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary.
Reason: Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure
WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails
WP:PLOT,
WP:GNG,
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary.
Reason: No indication this fictional location passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to show anything that's not a mention in passing/fictional bio summary.
Reason: No indication this fictional location passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to show anything that's not a mention in passing/fictional bio summary.
Reason: Fictional concept "never explained in detail" (sigh - but hey, we can do what the primary sources couldn't, right?). No evidence of notability. BEFORE fails to find any in-depth coverage outside primary sources.
Reason: No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT+
WP:OR.
Reason: No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT+
WP:OR.
Reason: No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT+
WP:OR.
Reason: No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT+
WP:OR.
Reason: No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT+
WP:OR.
Reason: No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT+
WP:OR.
Reason: No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT+
WP:OR.
Reason: No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT+
WP:OR.
Reason: No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. Pure
WP:PLOT+
WP:OR.
Reason: No evidence this fictional organization passes
WP:GNG,
WP:NFICTION and like. BEFORE fails to find anything that is not an in-universe
WP:PLOT summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Local travel agency with coverage limited to primary sources (own website and like) and press releases about business as usual. Fails
WP:NCORP.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: How is this comic book location notable? Sources are the usual PRMARY for PLOT, plus list of appearances in media. It was also made into two or three toy sets. Nothing here seems sufficient to warrant a stand-alone article?
Reason: How is this comic book location notable? Sources are the usual PRMARY for PLOT, plus list of appearances in media. Nothing here seems sufficient to warrant a stand-alone article?
Reason: How is this comic book location notable? Sources are the usual PRMARY for PLOT, plus list of appearances in media. Nothing here seems sufficient to warrant a stand-alone article?
Reason: A very minor location in Tolkienverse (Silmarillion). Could redirect to that book or to
Middle-Earth#Geography. Fails GNG/NFICTION/PLOT. Sources are just PRIMARY.
Reason: Seems to fail GNG/NFICTION. Pure plot. Can be soft deleted by redirecting to
Ooze (Dungeons & Dragons) instead of regular deletion. Nothing to merge since it's all plot, no analysis.
Reason: Seems to fail GNG/NFICTION. Pure plot. Can be soft deleted by redirecting to
Ooze (Dungeons & Dragons) instead of regular deletion. Nothing to merge since it's all plot, no analysis.
Reason: Seems to fail GNG/NFICTION. Pure plot. Can be soft deleted by redirecting to
Ooze (Dungeons & Dragons) instead of regular deletion. Nothing to merge since it's all plot, no analysis.
Reason: Seems to fail GNG/NFICTION. Pure plot with PRIMARY sourcing outside one minor list of d&d monsters and a single list inclusion is a far cry from GNG requirements.
Reason: Fictional race that fails WP:NFICTION, WP:GNG and WP:PLOT. BEFORE does not show any analysis, only in-universe style summaries plus a list of appearances in other media. The article contains likely OR.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:GNG/
WP:NCOMPNAY. Refs are mentions in passing/press releases/business as usual PR "notice us" reports.
WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES.
Reason: What makes this product (phone) notable? I couldn't find any review in an outlet that seems reliable and not just blog advert or a rewritten press releases. Fails
WP:GNG (also similar situation to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivo V2).
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:GNG/
WP:NCOMPANY. It sold and serviced an old computer that is notable.. rather extreme failure of
WP:NOTINHERITED?
Reason: No evidence this company passes WP:GNG/WP:NCOMPANY. Sources/coverage seem limited to pess releases and like, no awards, etc. Just business as usual.
WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES
Reason: Seems to fail
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Two notable owners resulted in decline of A7, but
WP:NOTINHERITED. Could redirect to Asustek as the majority holder, perhaps, if one thinks it is a plausible search term?
Reason: No evidence this passes GNG/
WP:NCOMPANY. Developer of one possibly notable piece of soft (
WP:NOTINHERITED). Perhaps soft delete by redirecting to
Cirquent?
Reason: No evidence this passes
Wikipedia:Notability (software). Reference link 1 is to a search that produces no results, and link 2 seems to show an old ad.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional plot summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional plot summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional plot summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional plot summary.
Reason: Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/
WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a
WP:PLOT-like fictional plot summary.
Reason: Does not seem to meet NCOMPANY/GNG. Refs limited to press-releases, their rewrites, and routine reports. BEFORE does not show anything much better. No awards, no in-depth analysis or coverage that's not paid for.
Reason: Does not seem to pass GNG/NCOMPANY. Being second biggest XYZ in Fooland is not relevant. No evidence of in-depth coverage outside press releases and routine business reports. Few mentions in passing.
WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES.
Reason: Fails NCOMPANY/GNG. BEFORE does not show anything beyond mentions in passing and press releases or their rewrites. Could soft del and redirect to
South African Post Office?
Reason: Seems to fail GNG/
WP:NSOFTWARE. Second reference in the article is not a review, just mention in passing. BEFORE only found one more low quality review (
[1]). I don't think that's enough.
Reason: Unreliable sources used, books search fails to find a single hit for this, google search shows primarily wiki mirrors. Fails
WP:GNG, possible hoax or super niche non-notable jargon.
Reason: No evidence this subsidiary passes
WP:NCOMPANY. Redirecting to parent company
Unilever is an option, but are such subsidiaries likely searchable terms?
Reason: No evidence this fictional character passes GNG/NFICTION. No in-depth sources, no reception section, no analysis, pure WP:PLOT/appearances in media.
Reason: No evidence this fictional character passes GNG/NFICTION. No reception outside an interview on a blog, and BEFORE shows only mentions in passing on fan pages and like.
Reason: Fails GNG.
WP:OR concerns. BEFPRE search shows here is a portrait of that name, but this unreferenced article has little connection, [[WP:TNT] level anyway.
Reason: No evidence this fictional character passes
WP:NFICTION/GNG. Some mentions of queen Peronella in 19th century texts, no analysis or such.
WP:TNT in any case, given this article doesn't even attribute the fictional work she originate from.
Reason: No evidence this software passes
WP:NSOFT/GNG. No references, no reviews, etc. (Also not seeing any in my BEFORE through there are some mentions in passing).
Reason: No evidence this character passes NFICTION/GNG. One local news piece (cited) is the best coverage, then there are few mentions in blogs and worse.
Reason: No evidence this radio program passes
WP:NMEDIA/GNG.
Clearly based on a faulty
WP:BEFORE. A proper one should have made it clear that there is a reasonable target for a mergeThe Bannertalk 12:26, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Reason: No evidence of passing
WP:GNG/NBIO. Claim (unreferenced, presumed general ref is broken) of being one of the richest people and little besides that. Not seeing any in-depth coverage in my BEFORE.
Reason: Not seeing any source that discusses this character for more then a single sentence. Mentions are in passing and generally
WP:PLOT summaries. Seems to fail GNG/NFICTION.
Reason: No evidence this fictional character passes
WP:NFICTION/GNG. At present, all references are PRIMARY. BEFORE shows some plot summaries and such, but no analysis that goes beyond that.
Reason: No evidence of passing
WP:NFICTION/GNG. Plot summary + list of appearances in media. No discussion of reception/significance. BEFORE fails to show better sources (but maybe they exist in Japanese? Unfortunately ja wiki entry on this is even more barebone than ours).
Reason: Niche neologism / jargon used in very few sources. GSCholar/Books show only a few publications using it, not much more on google (bunch of Wikipedia mirrors). Term / concept seems to fail
WP:NSOFTWARE/GNG.
Reason: No evidence of passing
WP:GNG/
WP:NBIO. No inline references so a possible
WP:BLP issue. No sv interwiki to expand from. BEFORE does not show any in-depth coverage (if you deprod this, please add at least two in-depth independent sources about the subject as required by GNG).
Reason: No evidence the subject passes
WP:NBIO/GNG. No in-depth coverage found. Sources are either in passing or not independent (press releases) and usually both anyway.
Reason: Complete unreferenced. BEFORE shows mentions in passing and some plot summaries. I am not seeing any work that has analyzed the significance of this fictional reception or such. Fails
WP:NFICTION/
WP:GNG. I am supportive of any SOFTDELETE/PRESERVE to some list of fictional locations, but there is nothing to merge (given zero references).
Reason: No evidence of notability (fails
WP:GNG/
WP:NCOMPANY). BEFOFE fails to show any useful coverage. Name might be mispelled (Verrerie ode Brehat?).
Reason: Seems to fail
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Not seeing anything outside press releases and their rewrites, generally just few mentions in passing. Can possibly consider SOFTDELETE and redirect to
FK Teteks. No referenced content to merge.
Reason: No evidence this passes GNG/
WP:NCOMPANY. BEFORE shows few mentions in passing/press-releases. Not seeing any good redirect target (just redirecting to Coca-Cola seems unhelpful since there is nothing to merge (no referenced content) and no need for the article about CC to mention this minor bottler.
Reason: No evidence this fictional topic is notable (fails
WP:NFICTION/GNG). No referenced non-
WP:PLOT content to merge. Could redirect to
Peter_Duck#Plot_summary but how plausible is this for a search term?
Reason: No evidence this fictional entity passes
WP:NFICTION/GNG. No referenced target to merge. No singular good redirect target (topic briefly mentioned in several works of fiction).
Reason: Fictional topic that fails
WP:NFICTION. No referenced content to merge. Can redirect to
Sword of Honour but concern remains whether it is a plausible search term.
Reason: Likely fail at
WP:NBIO. Sources cited are: a press release, a self-written biography blurb and a blog. BEFORE does not show any in-depth coverage that's reliable and independent of the subject.
Reason: Major notability concerns. Sources about the subject seem to fail requirements for NBIO/GNG, they are either in passing, rewritten press-releases, or
WP:INTERVIEWS.
Reason: Digital-only radio channel that existed for presumably few years, maybe 10+? Fails
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Sv wiki article is even less complete than this. Unreferenced, both of them.
Reason: No evidence this fictional creature is notable (fails GNG/NFICTION). The article is pure
WP:PLOT with primary sources. Effectively a
WP:DICTDEF too.
Reason: Not seeing significant coverage, few mentions in passing, some on social media. Seems to fail
WP:NORG/GNG. Possibly the related book is notable, and this could redirect there, but nobody created the article about the book yet.
Reason: No evidence this company passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. BEFORE shows only few mentions in passing, primarily routine press releases (mergers, acquisitions, etc.). No in-depth coverage. Non news/PR coverage is limited to single in-passing mention in minor scholarly article (
[2]) which does not discuss it in depth, just acknowledges its existence in passing. I don't think that's enough.
Reason: No evidence of passing
WP:NORG/GNG. BEFORE does not show any in-depth coverage, few mentions in passing at most. No referenced content to merge. No good redirect target (it is not mentioned in any other article outside of a 'see also'), so it fails
WP:R#PLA.
Reason: No evidence of passing
WP:NORG/GNG. BEFORE does not show any in-depth coverage, few mentions in passing at most. Note: it is a publisher, so it does get a good amount of google hits. But there is no in-depth coverage, or even in passing, all I see are citations to it plus
WP:SPS publications. No referenced content to merge. No good redirect target (it is not mentioned in any other article), so it fails
WP:R#PLA.
Reason: Not seeing what makes this company pass
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. BEFORE shows only press releases, their rewrites and mentions in passing. No valid merge or redirect target.
Reason: Not seeing what makes him pass
WP:GNG/
WP:NBIO. BEFORE does not show any in-depth coverage, a few mentions in passing (warning: there are other notable individuals with the same name, so googlehit is overinflated!).
Reason: Seems to fail
WP:NBIO/GNG (also some
WP:BLP issues). Coverage is in passing, nothing in-depth, I am not seeing a single article about him. He is often mentioned as a major donor, but coverage in such cases ranges from one sentences to a generic paragraph bio-blurb likely submitted by his staff. There is some recent coverage about a solicitation charge, but it raises BLP issues, plus
WP:ONEEVENT. No valid redirect/merge target. He seems to keep a relatively low media profile...
Reason: Not seeing what makes this obscure card game notable. I found one not very reliable review in Internet Archive. BGG page shows no evidence of any impact. No awards, no reviews. This product (game) does not seem to pass
WP:GNG.
Reason: I am not seeing any references for this, not even in passing. There are some google hits but they seem to be about the general usage of the word alternation, not about a game named thus. There is such a solitaire variant, at least there are some online versions of it, but nothing goes beyond basic rules and 'play this here' type of pages. I am not seeing any in-depth, independent coverage. As such, the topic seems to fail
WP:GNG, also
WP:V and
WP:OR are an issue. Not seeing a good redirect target and there is no referenced content to merge.
Reason: No evidence of passing GNG/NBIO. Few passing mentions on the web, no substantial in-depth coverage. Was just deleted from pl wiki as neither my BEFORE nor anyone elses where able to find sources to suggest he passes NBIO or such (
[3]).
Reason: This minor religious observation does not appear to be notable. Source cited is unreliable (self-published by minor Polish religious congregation related to the
Slavic Native Faith which invented this festival). Search for Polish sources yields nothing except blogs and related low quality websites all linked to this religious movement.
Reason: Unreferenced. Fails
WP:GNG/
WP:NBOOK. Not seeing any reliable reviews or in-depth discussion in my BEFORE, few mentions in passing on blogs/forums and such. Not mentioned at
Goodman Games so fails
WP:R#ASTONISH test for redirecting. Nothing referenced to merge to make a mention (adding unreferenced mention is a
WP:V issue).
Reason: Unreferenced. No evidence this product passes
WP:GNG. BEFORE does not show anything but mentions in unreliable bee rating sites/blogs. No valid redirect/merge target.
Reason: No evidence this product passes
WP:GNG. BEFORE does not show anything but mentions in unreliable bee rating sites/blogs. No valid redirect/merge target.
Reason: No evidence this product passes
WP:GNG. BEFORE does not show anything but mentions in unreliable bee rating sites/blogs. No valid redirect/merge target.
Reason: Unreferenced incomplete list of two brands of Argentinian beer. Does not contain a single prose sentence of text. Very early draft not even a stub. Not ready for mainspace.
Reason: No evidence this product passes
WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. BEFORE does not show anything but mentions in passing. No valid redirect/merge target (not mentioned in any article outside see also section; no referenced content to merge, redirect to Heineken goes against
WP:R#ASTONISH).
Reason: Not seeing what makes him notable (likely fail of
WP:NBIO). Sources are very poor - few mentions in passing in family tree, company websites, and such. BEFORE shows very little (don't confuse him with his father
Thomas Cobbold (1680–1752) that gets a little bit more coverage and has borderline notability).
Reason: Unreferenced, problematic notability. Not seeing anything in sources that is not a simple
WP:DICTDEF (regional name for a pub). No valid merge/redirect target.
Reason: Seems to fail GNG/
WP:NBOOK. BEFORE shows only blog/forum reviews. No independently referenced content to merge. Please do not confuse with a more notable RPG system "Empire of the Petal Throne" from 1975 when counting your google hits :)
Reason: Likely fail of GNG/NBOOK. Super obscure topic that has people wondering if Wikipedia article is a hoax (
[4]). No evidence that any source contains any in-depth coverage of this game.
Reason: No evidence of notability, not seeing anything outside promotional materials and unreliable user (drinker...) reviews. No referenced content to merge.
Reason: No evidence this database passes
WP:GNG. No referenced content to merge. Redirect to
Sustainable Development Online fails
WP:R#ASTONISH as the target page does not even mention this database.
Reason: I don't see how this biography meets
WP:CRIMINAL/GNG. Few mentions in media limited to
WP:ONEVENT. No valid merge/redirect target. Mention on the
List of serial killers in the United States seems sufficient. Not every serial killer is notable (particularly given his 3 victims, the minimum amount require to get classified as a sk).
Reason: Not seeing what makes him notable (failure of
WP:GNG/
WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE). BEFORE does not show a single in-depth source, just few mentions in passing, and a CV-like entry at
[5] that is likely not independent of the subject. Ford-fan wikia does not have anything more (
[6]) but could in fact benefit from transwiki copy from us before deletion. A merger to
Ford Motor Company would be problematic as that article does not have a section on employees, and it would look out of place (and clearly, can't even title such section 'notable employees'). Not every higher level executive is notable.
Reason: No evidence the subject passes
WP:GNG. BEFORE shows only a few mentions in passing. The
[7] article does not seem to be about the same concept but about a different "minet" concept. No referenced content to merge, no valid redirect target per
WP:R#ASTONISH.
Reason: No evidence of this fictional race passing
WP:NFICTION/GNG. Appear only in 2-3 novels. BEFORE fails to find any in-depth discussion of this race in any work. This article is pure
WP:PLOT and BEFORE shows only few passing mentions that are also pure plot.
Reason: Fails
WP:NBOOK/GNG. Unpublished, will never be written, just a title speculation. No valid redirect target, no referenced content to merge anywhere since the content here is not even about the said book. BEFORE shows no useful references, even fan wiki has just a tiny speculative stub (
[8]).
Reason: No evidence this concept is discussed in scientific publications, it is a fan invention and BEFORE shows its discussion is limited to unreliable websites/blogs/forums. Just 'playing with moth' concept that fails
WP:GNG.