From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: ( successful, unsuccessful)


Bot-reported

User-reported


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Tom Sandoval

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 04:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Good News Mission

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Poorly explained removal of content by several IPs over the last 24 hours or so. CycloneYoris talk! 04:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

MTV (Latin American TV channel)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker ( talk) 04:48, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Lang Park

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip's and some user accounts vandalising the article. Knitsey ( talk) 07:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Because You Loved Me

Reason: Would like this page to be WP:SEMIPROTECTED. There are persistent overlinking of same duplicated audio youtube link & irrelevant video link by 95.248.88.77, which there were ongoing for more than a year (eg 1163401562) for more than a year different anon IPs coming from same ISP, same country and all are from same region of the same country. Most of the WP:ELNO WP:OVERLINK are Celine Dion songs, though there are some other songs too. An ANI report had been lodged at WP:ANI#95.248.88.77 Persistent overlink duplicates and irrelevant links. --- Cat12zu3 ( talk) 08:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Greek football clubs in European competitions

Reason: Worked a lot on this page, Persistent disruptive editing by IP users like 2A02:586:813D:2A91:34D3:B3E2:D518:C390 who continuously revert edits and use language like your reasoning is ridiculous. Abudabanas ( talk) 09:43, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Colourblocks

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unregistered users are adding unsourced content. 48 JCL 12:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Withdrawn- it appears to have stopped. —  48 JCL 12:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor Lectonar ( talk) 14:33, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Kispest

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing from various IPs. FromCzech ( talk) 12:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Sambhaji Raje

Reason: High level of vandalism expected because of recent controversies surrounding him Quabizabdul ( talk) 13:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Ashley Klein

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Here we go again.. – macaddct1984 ( talk | contribs) 13:43, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Lalengmawia Ralte

Reason: High level of Vandalism Ghdfghmp ( talk) 14:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Anwar Ali (footballer, born 2000)

Reason: Vandalism Ghdfghmp ( talk) 14:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Killing of Mohammad Bhar

Indefinite Extended Confirmed Protection: WP:CT/A-I and serious vandalism. Pachu Kannan ( talk) 15:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{ Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{ Edit protected}}, {{ Edit template-protected}}, {{ Edit extended-protected}}, or {{ Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{ Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

User:Avicennasis/todo/Header

Current requests

Account creator

User:S-Aura

Hello! Wikipedians, I'm S-Aura with over three years of experience and extended confirmed user rights. I'd like to request an account creation on Wikipedia. Thank you! 𝒮- 𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:34, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done User is not active in the WP:ACC process. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

User:C1K98V

Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Link to previous request. (I have no opinion at this time.) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 05:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Extraordinary Writ, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. —  C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Joe Roe, you declined this previously. Do you want to have another look? Schwede 66 06:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm sorry I don't have time to look at this properly right now. I'm happy for another admin to process it as they see fit. –  Joe ( talk) 09:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Joe Roe, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. —  C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

AutoWikiBrowser


User:Zhing'za zï Ïnin

I wish to use AutoWikiBrowser for making otherwise-tedious edits to replace widely-used raster images with vectorized equivalents. ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 22:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

For the record I previously declined a request with a similar reason. I will leave this one for another admin to evaluate. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Apologies, I was unaware that it was denied. I will do this manually instead. ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 05:44, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

User:SerChevalerie

Previously had AWB rights, back to editing now. SerChevalerie ( talk) 07:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had their access to AutoWikiBrowser automatically revoked ( [1]). MusikBot talk 08:00, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Bugnawfang

Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights Hi. I'm Bugnawfang. Lately, I have been editing on articles about some places in the Philippines. Recently, however, the Negros Island Region was created again after a law was signed by the president of the Philippines. Hence, there are 19 cities and 44 municipalities' pages that still have the old "Central Visayas (Region VII)" and "Western Visayas (Region VI)" region template tags. I am aware that my edits do not meet the threshold, but I do want to update these pages, and making edits one-by-one on these pages is tedious on its own. With this, I may request for the permission to use AWB to add the "Negros Island Region" template on these pages. Bugnawfang ( talk) 13:33, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

User:AirshipJungleman29

Would be useful to make tedious edits. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 17:24, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

User:John

Been on hiatus for a couple of years and my access was revoked. I used to enjoy using the typo fixing facility and might like to try it again. John ( talk) 14:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had their access to AutoWikiBrowser automatically revoked ( [2]). MusikBot talk 15:00, 17 July 2024 (UTC)


Confirmed


Event coordinator


Extended confirmed

User:FightStranger

I understand that i does not completed the 500 edits and 30 days on Wikipedia but, i created a account on 1 April 2021 and completed 890 edits but i forgotten the user name and password of the account, i doesn't restored account, i realy a experienced editor of Wikipedia please give me Extended confirmed rights, I request you, i really completed 890 edits on my previous account but i forgotten the user name. So please give me extended confirmed rights on this account other than that account I know you will decline this request but I am making the request because you understand my grief and give it to me, that you not give the rights i will go to depression FightStranger ( talk) 09:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

 Pending approval - please approve the request. FightStranger ( talk) 09:59, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 Not done. I have no way to verify you have another account if you don't remember its name. Even if you knew, you would not be able to confirm from the other account it's truly yours. Fortunately, very few articles on Wikipedia require extended confirmed, so there is no need to be discouraged here! —Femke 🐦 ( talk) 20:02, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Microplastic Consumer

I've been editing since 2022 and have not committed any instances of valdalism, the odds of me reaching 500 edits anytime soon is very unlikely (I am currently at ~320). In order to edit extended confirmed articles such as the 2024 United States presidential election, I need this privilege. Thank you for considering my request. Microplastic Consumer ( talk) 22:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

As the template says, your chances of being granted early extended confirmed are almost zero, since this account is not an alt.
If you need to edit that page, you can use tools such as Twinkle to inflate your edits, and you can go on recent changs patrol, since from one instance of vandalism you can squeeze out two or three edits. You would only need around 60-90 instances of vandalism, and the usual half-hour patrol can bring you between five and thirty. So just a two-hour patrol could possible bring you up to extended-confirmed status (let's say that the vandalism levels are high, and a half hour patrol would give you thirty instances of vandalism to fix. If you got three edits most of the time, it would take between an hour and a half and two hours)
. And if you also do other edits other than patrolling during the session, you could easily bring yourself to the status you want in far less time than you expected.
Moral of the story: You really don't need to request when in less than a day you can quickly, and easily, get extended-confirmed. My problem is: I have 640 edits (in 28 days, so around 23 edits per day), but I still need two more days to get the permission!
Also, do you have to edit extended-confirmed articles? You could just file an edit request.
Hope this helps, Apollogetticax| talk 07:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

User:48JCL public

I am the alt account of 48JCL, I will log into it (I am in a public library right now) for proof. 48JCL public ( talk) 15:11, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Proof —  48 JCL 15:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

File mover


Mass message sender



New page reviewer

User:Extorc

I have more than 6000 edits as an editor over a time period of around 3 years. I have created several pages which I continue to maintain and have participated in processes like Request for moves and closures as well. Iv taken initiative in Anti-Vandalism work. I can help reduce the backlog. >>>  Extorc. talk 14:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

User:HRShami

I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami ( talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Evilfreethinker

I'd like to help reduce NPP and AFC backlogs. I've read the terms and rules. Evilfreethinker ( talk) 10:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Suntooooth

I'd like to help out with NPP considering the backlog, and now that I've created a few articles I feel like I'm ready. Suntooooth, it/he ( talk/ contribs) 18:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)\

User:SparrowQ

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights

As an experienced Wiki editor, I am requesting new page reviewer rights to help maintain the quality and accuracy of new pages. Your approval would allow me to contribute more effectively to wiki community. SparrowQ ( talk) 18:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 18:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Can I resubmit request or wait for approval ? SparrowQ ( talk) 20:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

User:KingSkyLord

I have been a long-time editor on this site for 7 years with lots of experience creating articles and participating in AfD discussions. I plan to use this permission to help clear the backlog and provide feedback to editors for their new articles, regardless of whether their article is notable or not. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 12:26, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Noorullah21

I've had previous experience, had it on trial period for a month during the back-drive, and I feel like I can especially do more. Noorullah ( talk) 11:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Xegma

Hello there, I am interested tn helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and love to do so. Xegma (talk) 07:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Question, though I am not an administrator, I see that you have published accepted AFC submissions, even if they lack citations or are in need of some fixing. And some have orange banners on them. Why is this? —  48 JCL 01:01, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Iwaqarhashmi

I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help review newly-created articles and lower the backlog. I have accepted lots of drafts at AFC and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to exhibit my knowledge of notability, as I was advised previously. Thanks! Waqar 💬 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ( [3]). MusikBot talk 20:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Garsh2

Good day. I am requesting to be granted the New Page Reviewer permission to assist with the growing new page backlog. I have created 8 new articles (although one was a complete rewrite that I then pushed through AfC) and meet the edit and age requirements for this permission. I also have demonstrated experience in the AfC process in both articles and redirects and have some experience in deletion related areas. I maintain rollback and pending change permissions, both of which I use regularly. I believe I can (and will) be of assistance in reducing the NPP backlog, if given the opportunity. Thank you. Garsh ( talk) 23:20, 15 July 2024 (UTC)


Page mover


User:KingSkyLord

I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Wikishovel

Hello, my page mover privilege has just expired, after 90 days of what I believe to have been productive use in NPP and AFC. Could it be extended please? Thanks. Wikishovel ( talk) 06:20, 15 July 2024 (UTC)



Pending changes reviewer

User:RodRabelo7

I've been a rollbacker for some time now, and when I patrol the recent changes, it's not at all uncommon to come across pending revisions. Thus, I imagine that having the permission of a pending changes reviewer would help me in anti-vandalism activities and, even more, reduce the backlog and the work of other volunteers. Helping directly on Special:PendingChanges is also a possibility, of course. Thank you, RodRabelo7 ( talk) 09:42, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Madeforall1

Im requesting pending changes reviewer rights because I wish to review some changes made by inexperienced users, I’ll be fully active and really want to get this right. Madeforall1 ( talk) 10:14, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Per your discussion here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funnybros. It shows any editor with the motive to promote a subject either by Youtube link or any other link that are not necessary or accepted by wikipedia. You are likely to accept them. So I will be afraid if this right is being granted to you for the betterment of wikipedia. Administrators should be aware. Gabriel (talk to me ) 11:52, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Honestly, Gabriel101, I've looked at this user's contributions, and they look more than ready to be a reviewer. On top of that, you are requesting the same rights of this user? And though I am saying the same thing as this user did on your request, did you have to say what you said here and not on the user's talk page? Apollogetticax| talk 06:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Point of correction, I am not Gabriel101. And to address your concern. If I had gone to user talk page it could have been useless or a waste of time as the same user has removed everything that was notified against him recently by other editors. I don’t know what you have looked but I see no sense in what you are saying if you have really looked as you said and not noticing an edit was stroked here. Regarding same permission kindly read Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingdom Achievers Award. I will advice you focus on your Sockpuppet account case User:User:HTML5, CSS3! and here User_talk:Ferret#Thank_you. Cheers. Gabriel (weytin dey sup) 12:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Randomstaplers

I'm starting to review pages for copyvios, and, as a result, I'm starting to encounter reviewer-protected pages. (If the article on Rotten Tomatoes wasn't a backwards-copy, I might have been hosed.) In any case, I hope my experience across multiple Wikimedia projects demonstrates the competence needed for this permission. ⸺ RandomStaplers 00:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Gabriel601

I am well familiar with the Wikipedia Copyright violations, Wikipedia Biographies of living persons and much more of Verifiability to other subject aside humans. My main focus are on the WikiProject Nigeria and little works from other Wikiproject. Reason being so I don't get occupied with other subject am not 100% familiar with their source such as Indian and the rest. Gabriel (talk to me ) 12:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

You commented ill about me based on the permission I’m trying to get, the best place was to be my talk page but you came here to say such why? And now you want same permission I’m requesting for? Not cool @ Gabriel601 Madeforall1 ( talk) 06:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Apollogetticax

Hello, I am a Wikipedia editor who has an entire month of experience with counter-vandalism, and I also make many copyedits. I would like to stop vandalism in its crib by being a pending changes reviewer and stopping vandalism on pending changes-protected pages. I know what is vandalism and what isn't, and I am familiar with Wikipedia's policies, including Biographies of living persons, Neutral point of view, No original research, Verifiability and What Wikipedia is not. I have read WP:Copyrights and I have read the guideline on reviewing. I am also in process of receiving rollback permissions, and you can see the discussion there too. Thanks, Apollogetticax| talk 04:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 28 days. MusikBot talk 04:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Well, 28 days is enough because on my first few days after I got Twinkle I spent over five hours (per day) RC patrolling. Apollogetticax| talk 06:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

User:ThatOneWolf

Hey there! I'm ThatOneWolf, and, I know I've been here twice before, but those times I admit I didn't really get the whole idea of experience and stuff. Plus, my last request was months ago. I took a little break recently when I just was checking my talk page and watchlist, but now I've come back to editing.

Anyway, the reason I'm requesting Reviewer rights now is because I feel like I could help in that area, with most of my edits being vandalism reversions. I also feel I suitably warn editors when I think they are intending to vandalize, or just let them know if it seems they could be trying to help. I've read all the policies listed in Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, and am very familiar with the copyright laws. This is why I feel I would be more fit now to receive this right. Thanks for reading! -- ThatOneWolf ( Chat Edits 12:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)



Rollback

User:Rkieferbaum

Hi there! Requesting rollback rights to be able to use different tools for reverting vandalism. I'm open to any questions or feedback on my editing and counter-vandalism actions. Cheers. Rkieferbaum ( talk) 11:34, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits. Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? - Fastily 06:21, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
@ Fastily: hi there. It's true that I seldom warn IP users that don't edit on a regular basis. I just feel like no one is going to see that warning and it might be confusing for other users from that IP. This might be a mistake on my part and I'll gladly fix it. You'll see that, with registered users, I've warned them 100% of the time or very close to that. Thanks for your time. Rkieferbaum ( talk) 10:59, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? - Fastily 10:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
@ Fastily: of course, it's a promise. I do agree that welcoming newcomers is among the most important things we do here. Thanks. Rkieferbaum ( talk) 11:29, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Great, thanks for confirming. Could you please now go some RC patrol in which you demonstrate how you will be notifying all users? - Fastily 03:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
@ Fastily: sure! I've been at it for a few minutes. I'll leave a warning each and every time from now on, IP or otherwise. Cheers and thanks for your input. Rkieferbaum ( talk) 00:37, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 Done - Fastily 10:16, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

User:245CMR

  • 245CMR ( t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created ( xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ( blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) ( assign permissions)( acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)
  • I used to be highly active before 2022, and had rollback rights back then (was inactive for quite a while)
  • I have a history of defending WP: Hinduism related articles, and further need to do it, especially after few recurring cases of vandalism by a series of sockpuppets
  • It may seem that i am constantly reverting a particular user's edits but that user is a sockpuppet of Kairakairav, [see their huge list of sockpuppets] who removes well sourced info, blanks them and add original research stuff, most of which are also factually incorrect. The sockpuppets get blocked, but somehow returns with a new account (Not only me, but other users have also reported this issue in the user's earlier sockpuppet investigations). It is alo worthless to tell them to stop on talk page, as they never reply and keep doing the same stuff; recent example of Madri which was blanked by them!
  • Its quite irritating for me to constantly go to history and copy paste entire full page, so the rollback right will be quite helpful, Thanks .245CMR. 👥 📜 09:03, 16 July 2024 (UTC) .245CMR. 👥 📜 09:03, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges ( Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 10:16, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
@ Fastily: Really!? I just explained how the sockpuppet User:NairaMahiHDPaakhiAadhya basically removed cited information from articles like Kunti, Madri, Sahadeva, Eklavya, etc. It's been reported by other users, see that user's earlier sockpuppets (linked in the request). Also its pointless to try to guide them as i seriously tried to do so many time on their earlier (now blocked) accounts. Recently while doing manual copy paste, I accidentally deleted chunks of articles by mistake. I really require this right as I am free to waste my entire half an hour doing this. Sorry if I sounded rude, but I am really irritated after recently doing the manual copy paste for 100th time! .245CMR. 👥 📜 18:48, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes, really. You shouldn't be copy/pasting anyways. The use case you've described doesn't require rollback; we have tools such as Twinkle & Ultraviolet that already do what you're asking for. Like I said, if you're still interested in rollback, then please spend a month actively patrolling RecentChanges before creating a new request - Fastily 21:57, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
As a third party, I just want to comment on why you were copy pasting? Apollogetticax| talk 06:36, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Madeforall1

Greetings, I wish to get the Rollback right because I want to fight vandalism and revert edits that goes Wikipedia’s guidelines, also I want to be able to revert edits frm users who aren’t sure of what they are doing most especially IP user. Madeforall1 ( talk) 10:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done You don't need rollback to undo inappropriate edits. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges ( Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 10:16, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Apollogetticax

Hello! I would like to have the rollback permission to revert vandalism quicker and to use tools like Huggle. Also, with Awesome Aasim's RC patrol tool, reverting is very slow, but with rollback it will be much faster. I use Twinkle already.

I am keen in the field of anti-vandalism. While my track record isn't exactly the best, I acknowledge my mistakes, and improve on them. I can tell what is and what isn't vandalism, and I know to always warn users, no exception. While edit counts don't matter, I have over 250 mainspace edits (just for the record). This also brings light to my experience. I have been doing counter-vandalism since the day I created my account.

If you think I am doing anything wrong, you are free to tell me my mistakes, and I can fix myself. | Apollogetticax talk 23:03, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Lots of anti-vandalism in contribs including edit summaries, so that's great. Good attitude on talk pages. I was going to grant this but then I found they admitted to being the sockpuppet User:HTML5, CSS3! over at User talk:Ferret#Thank you. Honestly I am still inclined to grant, they seem to be reformed. But this probably needs a little discussion first. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 08:35, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Template editor

User:Jackdude101

I am heavily involved with editing route diagram templates and adding new items to template:rail-interchange, with a special focus on rail lines in France for the upcoming 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris starting later this month. I have made multiple edit requests there in the past, and very recently after refamiliarizing myself with the process, I've started to do it again. I would like the ability to edit that template directly so I don't have to rely on others to do it for me. Jackdude101  talk  cont 07:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done. Primefac ( talk) 00:06, 16 July 2024 (UTC)


Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

I left a note on their talk page. -- Office7724 ( talk) 12:49, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: ( successful, unsuccessful)


Bot-reported

User-reported


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Tom Sandoval

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 04:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Good News Mission

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Poorly explained removal of content by several IPs over the last 24 hours or so. CycloneYoris talk! 04:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

MTV (Latin American TV channel)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker ( talk) 04:48, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Lang Park

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip's and some user accounts vandalising the article. Knitsey ( talk) 07:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Because You Loved Me

Reason: Would like this page to be WP:SEMIPROTECTED. There are persistent overlinking of same duplicated audio youtube link & irrelevant video link by 95.248.88.77, which there were ongoing for more than a year (eg 1163401562) for more than a year different anon IPs coming from same ISP, same country and all are from same region of the same country. Most of the WP:ELNO WP:OVERLINK are Celine Dion songs, though there are some other songs too. An ANI report had been lodged at WP:ANI#95.248.88.77 Persistent overlink duplicates and irrelevant links. --- Cat12zu3 ( talk) 08:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Greek football clubs in European competitions

Reason: Worked a lot on this page, Persistent disruptive editing by IP users like 2A02:586:813D:2A91:34D3:B3E2:D518:C390 who continuously revert edits and use language like your reasoning is ridiculous. Abudabanas ( talk) 09:43, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Colourblocks

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unregistered users are adding unsourced content. 48 JCL 12:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Withdrawn- it appears to have stopped. —  48 JCL 12:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor Lectonar ( talk) 14:33, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Kispest

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing from various IPs. FromCzech ( talk) 12:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Sambhaji Raje

Reason: High level of vandalism expected because of recent controversies surrounding him Quabizabdul ( talk) 13:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Ashley Klein

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Here we go again.. – macaddct1984 ( talk | contribs) 13:43, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Lalengmawia Ralte

Reason: High level of Vandalism Ghdfghmp ( talk) 14:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Anwar Ali (footballer, born 2000)

Reason: Vandalism Ghdfghmp ( talk) 14:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Killing of Mohammad Bhar

Indefinite Extended Confirmed Protection: WP:CT/A-I and serious vandalism. Pachu Kannan ( talk) 15:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{ Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{ Edit protected}}, {{ Edit template-protected}}, {{ Edit extended-protected}}, or {{ Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{ Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

User:Avicennasis/todo/Header

Current requests

Account creator

User:S-Aura

Hello! Wikipedians, I'm S-Aura with over three years of experience and extended confirmed user rights. I'd like to request an account creation on Wikipedia. Thank you! 𝒮- 𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:34, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done User is not active in the WP:ACC process. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

User:C1K98V

Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Link to previous request. (I have no opinion at this time.) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 05:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Extraordinary Writ, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. —  C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Joe Roe, you declined this previously. Do you want to have another look? Schwede 66 06:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm sorry I don't have time to look at this properly right now. I'm happy for another admin to process it as they see fit. –  Joe ( talk) 09:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Joe Roe, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. —  C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

AutoWikiBrowser


User:Zhing'za zï Ïnin

I wish to use AutoWikiBrowser for making otherwise-tedious edits to replace widely-used raster images with vectorized equivalents. ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 22:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

For the record I previously declined a request with a similar reason. I will leave this one for another admin to evaluate. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Apologies, I was unaware that it was denied. I will do this manually instead. ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 05:44, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

User:SerChevalerie

Previously had AWB rights, back to editing now. SerChevalerie ( talk) 07:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had their access to AutoWikiBrowser automatically revoked ( [1]). MusikBot talk 08:00, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Bugnawfang

Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights Hi. I'm Bugnawfang. Lately, I have been editing on articles about some places in the Philippines. Recently, however, the Negros Island Region was created again after a law was signed by the president of the Philippines. Hence, there are 19 cities and 44 municipalities' pages that still have the old "Central Visayas (Region VII)" and "Western Visayas (Region VI)" region template tags. I am aware that my edits do not meet the threshold, but I do want to update these pages, and making edits one-by-one on these pages is tedious on its own. With this, I may request for the permission to use AWB to add the "Negros Island Region" template on these pages. Bugnawfang ( talk) 13:33, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

User:AirshipJungleman29

Would be useful to make tedious edits. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 17:24, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

User:John

Been on hiatus for a couple of years and my access was revoked. I used to enjoy using the typo fixing facility and might like to try it again. John ( talk) 14:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had their access to AutoWikiBrowser automatically revoked ( [2]). MusikBot talk 15:00, 17 July 2024 (UTC)


Confirmed


Event coordinator


Extended confirmed

User:FightStranger

I understand that i does not completed the 500 edits and 30 days on Wikipedia but, i created a account on 1 April 2021 and completed 890 edits but i forgotten the user name and password of the account, i doesn't restored account, i realy a experienced editor of Wikipedia please give me Extended confirmed rights, I request you, i really completed 890 edits on my previous account but i forgotten the user name. So please give me extended confirmed rights on this account other than that account I know you will decline this request but I am making the request because you understand my grief and give it to me, that you not give the rights i will go to depression FightStranger ( talk) 09:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

 Pending approval - please approve the request. FightStranger ( talk) 09:59, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 Not done. I have no way to verify you have another account if you don't remember its name. Even if you knew, you would not be able to confirm from the other account it's truly yours. Fortunately, very few articles on Wikipedia require extended confirmed, so there is no need to be discouraged here! —Femke 🐦 ( talk) 20:02, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Microplastic Consumer

I've been editing since 2022 and have not committed any instances of valdalism, the odds of me reaching 500 edits anytime soon is very unlikely (I am currently at ~320). In order to edit extended confirmed articles such as the 2024 United States presidential election, I need this privilege. Thank you for considering my request. Microplastic Consumer ( talk) 22:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

As the template says, your chances of being granted early extended confirmed are almost zero, since this account is not an alt.
If you need to edit that page, you can use tools such as Twinkle to inflate your edits, and you can go on recent changs patrol, since from one instance of vandalism you can squeeze out two or three edits. You would only need around 60-90 instances of vandalism, and the usual half-hour patrol can bring you between five and thirty. So just a two-hour patrol could possible bring you up to extended-confirmed status (let's say that the vandalism levels are high, and a half hour patrol would give you thirty instances of vandalism to fix. If you got three edits most of the time, it would take between an hour and a half and two hours)
. And if you also do other edits other than patrolling during the session, you could easily bring yourself to the status you want in far less time than you expected.
Moral of the story: You really don't need to request when in less than a day you can quickly, and easily, get extended-confirmed. My problem is: I have 640 edits (in 28 days, so around 23 edits per day), but I still need two more days to get the permission!
Also, do you have to edit extended-confirmed articles? You could just file an edit request.
Hope this helps, Apollogetticax| talk 07:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

User:48JCL public

I am the alt account of 48JCL, I will log into it (I am in a public library right now) for proof. 48JCL public ( talk) 15:11, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Proof —  48 JCL 15:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

File mover


Mass message sender



New page reviewer

User:Extorc

I have more than 6000 edits as an editor over a time period of around 3 years. I have created several pages which I continue to maintain and have participated in processes like Request for moves and closures as well. Iv taken initiative in Anti-Vandalism work. I can help reduce the backlog. >>>  Extorc. talk 14:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

User:HRShami

I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami ( talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Evilfreethinker

I'd like to help reduce NPP and AFC backlogs. I've read the terms and rules. Evilfreethinker ( talk) 10:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Suntooooth

I'd like to help out with NPP considering the backlog, and now that I've created a few articles I feel like I'm ready. Suntooooth, it/he ( talk/ contribs) 18:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)\

User:SparrowQ

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights

As an experienced Wiki editor, I am requesting new page reviewer rights to help maintain the quality and accuracy of new pages. Your approval would allow me to contribute more effectively to wiki community. SparrowQ ( talk) 18:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 18:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Can I resubmit request or wait for approval ? SparrowQ ( talk) 20:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

User:KingSkyLord

I have been a long-time editor on this site for 7 years with lots of experience creating articles and participating in AfD discussions. I plan to use this permission to help clear the backlog and provide feedback to editors for their new articles, regardless of whether their article is notable or not. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 12:26, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Noorullah21

I've had previous experience, had it on trial period for a month during the back-drive, and I feel like I can especially do more. Noorullah ( talk) 11:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Xegma

Hello there, I am interested tn helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and love to do so. Xegma (talk) 07:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Question, though I am not an administrator, I see that you have published accepted AFC submissions, even if they lack citations or are in need of some fixing. And some have orange banners on them. Why is this? —  48 JCL 01:01, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Iwaqarhashmi

I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help review newly-created articles and lower the backlog. I have accepted lots of drafts at AFC and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to exhibit my knowledge of notability, as I was advised previously. Thanks! Waqar 💬 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ( [3]). MusikBot talk 20:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Garsh2

Good day. I am requesting to be granted the New Page Reviewer permission to assist with the growing new page backlog. I have created 8 new articles (although one was a complete rewrite that I then pushed through AfC) and meet the edit and age requirements for this permission. I also have demonstrated experience in the AfC process in both articles and redirects and have some experience in deletion related areas. I maintain rollback and pending change permissions, both of which I use regularly. I believe I can (and will) be of assistance in reducing the NPP backlog, if given the opportunity. Thank you. Garsh ( talk) 23:20, 15 July 2024 (UTC)


Page mover


User:KingSkyLord

I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Wikishovel

Hello, my page mover privilege has just expired, after 90 days of what I believe to have been productive use in NPP and AFC. Could it be extended please? Thanks. Wikishovel ( talk) 06:20, 15 July 2024 (UTC)



Pending changes reviewer

User:RodRabelo7

I've been a rollbacker for some time now, and when I patrol the recent changes, it's not at all uncommon to come across pending revisions. Thus, I imagine that having the permission of a pending changes reviewer would help me in anti-vandalism activities and, even more, reduce the backlog and the work of other volunteers. Helping directly on Special:PendingChanges is also a possibility, of course. Thank you, RodRabelo7 ( talk) 09:42, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Madeforall1

Im requesting pending changes reviewer rights because I wish to review some changes made by inexperienced users, I’ll be fully active and really want to get this right. Madeforall1 ( talk) 10:14, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Per your discussion here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funnybros. It shows any editor with the motive to promote a subject either by Youtube link or any other link that are not necessary or accepted by wikipedia. You are likely to accept them. So I will be afraid if this right is being granted to you for the betterment of wikipedia. Administrators should be aware. Gabriel (talk to me ) 11:52, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Honestly, Gabriel101, I've looked at this user's contributions, and they look more than ready to be a reviewer. On top of that, you are requesting the same rights of this user? And though I am saying the same thing as this user did on your request, did you have to say what you said here and not on the user's talk page? Apollogetticax| talk 06:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Point of correction, I am not Gabriel101. And to address your concern. If I had gone to user talk page it could have been useless or a waste of time as the same user has removed everything that was notified against him recently by other editors. I don’t know what you have looked but I see no sense in what you are saying if you have really looked as you said and not noticing an edit was stroked here. Regarding same permission kindly read Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingdom Achievers Award. I will advice you focus on your Sockpuppet account case User:User:HTML5, CSS3! and here User_talk:Ferret#Thank_you. Cheers. Gabriel (weytin dey sup) 12:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Randomstaplers

I'm starting to review pages for copyvios, and, as a result, I'm starting to encounter reviewer-protected pages. (If the article on Rotten Tomatoes wasn't a backwards-copy, I might have been hosed.) In any case, I hope my experience across multiple Wikimedia projects demonstrates the competence needed for this permission. ⸺ RandomStaplers 00:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Gabriel601

I am well familiar with the Wikipedia Copyright violations, Wikipedia Biographies of living persons and much more of Verifiability to other subject aside humans. My main focus are on the WikiProject Nigeria and little works from other Wikiproject. Reason being so I don't get occupied with other subject am not 100% familiar with their source such as Indian and the rest. Gabriel (talk to me ) 12:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

You commented ill about me based on the permission I’m trying to get, the best place was to be my talk page but you came here to say such why? And now you want same permission I’m requesting for? Not cool @ Gabriel601 Madeforall1 ( talk) 06:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Apollogetticax

Hello, I am a Wikipedia editor who has an entire month of experience with counter-vandalism, and I also make many copyedits. I would like to stop vandalism in its crib by being a pending changes reviewer and stopping vandalism on pending changes-protected pages. I know what is vandalism and what isn't, and I am familiar with Wikipedia's policies, including Biographies of living persons, Neutral point of view, No original research, Verifiability and What Wikipedia is not. I have read WP:Copyrights and I have read the guideline on reviewing. I am also in process of receiving rollback permissions, and you can see the discussion there too. Thanks, Apollogetticax| talk 04:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 28 days. MusikBot talk 04:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Well, 28 days is enough because on my first few days after I got Twinkle I spent over five hours (per day) RC patrolling. Apollogetticax| talk 06:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

User:ThatOneWolf

Hey there! I'm ThatOneWolf, and, I know I've been here twice before, but those times I admit I didn't really get the whole idea of experience and stuff. Plus, my last request was months ago. I took a little break recently when I just was checking my talk page and watchlist, but now I've come back to editing.

Anyway, the reason I'm requesting Reviewer rights now is because I feel like I could help in that area, with most of my edits being vandalism reversions. I also feel I suitably warn editors when I think they are intending to vandalize, or just let them know if it seems they could be trying to help. I've read all the policies listed in Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, and am very familiar with the copyright laws. This is why I feel I would be more fit now to receive this right. Thanks for reading! -- ThatOneWolf ( Chat Edits 12:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)



Rollback

User:Rkieferbaum

Hi there! Requesting rollback rights to be able to use different tools for reverting vandalism. I'm open to any questions or feedback on my editing and counter-vandalism actions. Cheers. Rkieferbaum ( talk) 11:34, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits. Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? - Fastily 06:21, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
@ Fastily: hi there. It's true that I seldom warn IP users that don't edit on a regular basis. I just feel like no one is going to see that warning and it might be confusing for other users from that IP. This might be a mistake on my part and I'll gladly fix it. You'll see that, with registered users, I've warned them 100% of the time or very close to that. Thanks for your time. Rkieferbaum ( talk) 10:59, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? - Fastily 10:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
@ Fastily: of course, it's a promise. I do agree that welcoming newcomers is among the most important things we do here. Thanks. Rkieferbaum ( talk) 11:29, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Great, thanks for confirming. Could you please now go some RC patrol in which you demonstrate how you will be notifying all users? - Fastily 03:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
@ Fastily: sure! I've been at it for a few minutes. I'll leave a warning each and every time from now on, IP or otherwise. Cheers and thanks for your input. Rkieferbaum ( talk) 00:37, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 Done - Fastily 10:16, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

User:245CMR

  • 245CMR ( t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created ( xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ( blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) ( assign permissions)( acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)
  • I used to be highly active before 2022, and had rollback rights back then (was inactive for quite a while)
  • I have a history of defending WP: Hinduism related articles, and further need to do it, especially after few recurring cases of vandalism by a series of sockpuppets
  • It may seem that i am constantly reverting a particular user's edits but that user is a sockpuppet of Kairakairav, [see their huge list of sockpuppets] who removes well sourced info, blanks them and add original research stuff, most of which are also factually incorrect. The sockpuppets get blocked, but somehow returns with a new account (Not only me, but other users have also reported this issue in the user's earlier sockpuppet investigations). It is alo worthless to tell them to stop on talk page, as they never reply and keep doing the same stuff; recent example of Madri which was blanked by them!
  • Its quite irritating for me to constantly go to history and copy paste entire full page, so the rollback right will be quite helpful, Thanks .245CMR. 👥 📜 09:03, 16 July 2024 (UTC) .245CMR. 👥 📜 09:03, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges ( Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 10:16, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
@ Fastily: Really!? I just explained how the sockpuppet User:NairaMahiHDPaakhiAadhya basically removed cited information from articles like Kunti, Madri, Sahadeva, Eklavya, etc. It's been reported by other users, see that user's earlier sockpuppets (linked in the request). Also its pointless to try to guide them as i seriously tried to do so many time on their earlier (now blocked) accounts. Recently while doing manual copy paste, I accidentally deleted chunks of articles by mistake. I really require this right as I am free to waste my entire half an hour doing this. Sorry if I sounded rude, but I am really irritated after recently doing the manual copy paste for 100th time! .245CMR. 👥 📜 18:48, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes, really. You shouldn't be copy/pasting anyways. The use case you've described doesn't require rollback; we have tools such as Twinkle & Ultraviolet that already do what you're asking for. Like I said, if you're still interested in rollback, then please spend a month actively patrolling RecentChanges before creating a new request - Fastily 21:57, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
As a third party, I just want to comment on why you were copy pasting? Apollogetticax| talk 06:36, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Madeforall1

Greetings, I wish to get the Rollback right because I want to fight vandalism and revert edits that goes Wikipedia’s guidelines, also I want to be able to revert edits frm users who aren’t sure of what they are doing most especially IP user. Madeforall1 ( talk) 10:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done You don't need rollback to undo inappropriate edits. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges ( Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 10:16, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Apollogetticax

Hello! I would like to have the rollback permission to revert vandalism quicker and to use tools like Huggle. Also, with Awesome Aasim's RC patrol tool, reverting is very slow, but with rollback it will be much faster. I use Twinkle already.

I am keen in the field of anti-vandalism. While my track record isn't exactly the best, I acknowledge my mistakes, and improve on them. I can tell what is and what isn't vandalism, and I know to always warn users, no exception. While edit counts don't matter, I have over 250 mainspace edits (just for the record). This also brings light to my experience. I have been doing counter-vandalism since the day I created my account.

If you think I am doing anything wrong, you are free to tell me my mistakes, and I can fix myself. | Apollogetticax talk 23:03, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Lots of anti-vandalism in contribs including edit summaries, so that's great. Good attitude on talk pages. I was going to grant this but then I found they admitted to being the sockpuppet User:HTML5, CSS3! over at User talk:Ferret#Thank you. Honestly I am still inclined to grant, they seem to be reformed. But this probably needs a little discussion first. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 08:35, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Template editor

User:Jackdude101

I am heavily involved with editing route diagram templates and adding new items to template:rail-interchange, with a special focus on rail lines in France for the upcoming 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris starting later this month. I have made multiple edit requests there in the past, and very recently after refamiliarizing myself with the process, I've started to do it again. I would like the ability to edit that template directly so I don't have to rely on others to do it for me. Jackdude101  talk  cont 07:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done. Primefac ( talk) 00:06, 16 July 2024 (UTC)


Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

I left a note on their talk page. -- Office7724 ( talk) 12:49, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook