Poland Template‑class | |||||||
|
I made some updates to the template to make it look more "professional". I changed the layout and reduced the font. I also replaced the Piast White Eagle with the current Polish Coat of Arms because that represents Polish statehood as we know it today, instead of at some arbitrary point in Polish history. But if that image is used in another template, I'd don't object to reverting to the Piast Eagle. Please let me know what you think. Appleseed 21:45, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
I'm thinking about replacing Polish government in exile with Polish Secret State. This template is about statehood, not government, and the government in exile was only one part of that State. Any thoughts? Appleseed 19:07, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
Could you please explain how these entries describe Polish statehood ?
I had removed most of them, but they were added again. Some are not Polish, some are no statehood. -- Matthead Discuß 02:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Congress Kingdom | Grand Duchy | |
---|---|---|
Head of state: | Czar of Russia with title of King of Poland | King of Prussia with title of Grand Duke of Poznań |
Represented by: | Namestnik of the Kingdom of Poland | Duke-Governor |
Parlament: | Sejm of the Congress Poland | Sejm of Grand Duchy of Poznań |
Language of administration: | Russian and Polish | German and Polish |
Separate army | yes | Separate regiments in Prussian army |
German puppet state was only proposed not created, in similar way we would have to include Polish-Czechoslovak Confederation or Polish-Ruthenian Union.-- Molobo ( talk) 11:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
I removed the Regency Kingdom as it wasn't even reckognised by Germany or Austria-and they used this as argument to deny Poles place in Brest-Litevsk talks.-- Molobo ( talk) 03:05, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Poland Template‑class | |||||||
|
I made some updates to the template to make it look more "professional". I changed the layout and reduced the font. I also replaced the Piast White Eagle with the current Polish Coat of Arms because that represents Polish statehood as we know it today, instead of at some arbitrary point in Polish history. But if that image is used in another template, I'd don't object to reverting to the Piast Eagle. Please let me know what you think. Appleseed 21:45, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
I'm thinking about replacing Polish government in exile with Polish Secret State. This template is about statehood, not government, and the government in exile was only one part of that State. Any thoughts? Appleseed 19:07, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
Could you please explain how these entries describe Polish statehood ?
I had removed most of them, but they were added again. Some are not Polish, some are no statehood. -- Matthead Discuß 02:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Congress Kingdom | Grand Duchy | |
---|---|---|
Head of state: | Czar of Russia with title of King of Poland | King of Prussia with title of Grand Duke of Poznań |
Represented by: | Namestnik of the Kingdom of Poland | Duke-Governor |
Parlament: | Sejm of the Congress Poland | Sejm of Grand Duchy of Poznań |
Language of administration: | Russian and Polish | German and Polish |
Separate army | yes | Separate regiments in Prussian army |
German puppet state was only proposed not created, in similar way we would have to include Polish-Czechoslovak Confederation or Polish-Ruthenian Union.-- Molobo ( talk) 11:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
I removed the Regency Kingdom as it wasn't even reckognised by Germany or Austria-and they used this as argument to deny Poles place in Brest-Litevsk talks.-- Molobo ( talk) 03:05, 30 November 2008 (UTC)