The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
BlueMoonset (
talk) 06:48, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
Poeticbent (
talk). Self nom at 02:25, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
That's not neutral (in my eyes) and something that seemingly outlandish needs more than one reference. Why have you linked street beatings to
swarm behaviour?
Secretlondon (
talk) 20:12, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Done. I added 3 more reference points to the hook. I replaced the wrong i-link (above) with
Swarming (military)#Modern military swarming since ORMO was indeed a paramilitary force (the i-link can also be removed altogether if needed). You're correct that extraordinary claims require sourcing. Please see my new ext. link to government-run
Institute of National Remembrance webpage about that. Nearly every other source in our article says pretty much the same thing anyways. Thanks for helping out, Secretlondon. Much appreciated. You are welcome to add your own ALT hooks also.
Poeticbenttalk 00:54, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
I think the hook needs the word "communist" in there since otherwise it's confusing.
VolunteerMarek 16:27, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
I totally agree. By the way, adding "communist" Poland's to the hook is still well-within the required length, at 179 chars. I already fixed that. Thank you, Volunteer Marek.
Poeticbenttalk 16:58, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Looks good. The specific historical period is important as there have been all kind of volunteer paramilitary groups and this succinctly clarifies the time period the article covers.
VolunteerMarek 23:47, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
BlueMoonset (
talk) 06:48, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
Poeticbent (
talk). Self nom at 02:25, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
That's not neutral (in my eyes) and something that seemingly outlandish needs more than one reference. Why have you linked street beatings to
swarm behaviour?
Secretlondon (
talk) 20:12, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Done. I added 3 more reference points to the hook. I replaced the wrong i-link (above) with
Swarming (military)#Modern military swarming since ORMO was indeed a paramilitary force (the i-link can also be removed altogether if needed). You're correct that extraordinary claims require sourcing. Please see my new ext. link to government-run
Institute of National Remembrance webpage about that. Nearly every other source in our article says pretty much the same thing anyways. Thanks for helping out, Secretlondon. Much appreciated. You are welcome to add your own ALT hooks also.
Poeticbenttalk 00:54, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
I think the hook needs the word "communist" in there since otherwise it's confusing.
VolunteerMarek 16:27, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
I totally agree. By the way, adding "communist" Poland's to the hook is still well-within the required length, at 179 chars. I already fixed that. Thank you, Volunteer Marek.
Poeticbenttalk 16:58, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Looks good. The specific historical period is important as there have been all kind of volunteer paramilitary groups and this succinctly clarifies the time period the article covers.
VolunteerMarek 23:47, 5 June 2012 (UTC)