The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PumpkinSkytalk 03:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
... that LOT Flight 16 from New York to Warsaw landed safely after the landing gear failed to deploy?
Created/expanded by
Ajh1492 (
talk). Self nom at 17:37, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Can we add links to the hook? I'd also suggest stubbing or creating an article on the pilot,
Tadeusz Wrona, and adding it here (it would be a two-article DYK nom then). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
talk to me 21:52, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Proposed Alt hook to incorporate the Tadeusz Wrona DYK:
I closed the merger discussion as "no merge", so the article is no longer festooned with that problematic template. Time for a review! --
Orlady (
talk) 03:21, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
I've reviewed the articles for dates, length, and hook fact sources. I "struck out" some items in the hooks that are not supported by the articles and sources. Otherwise the hooks are good. I've not checked for plagiarism issues yet. --
Orlady (
talk) 06:08, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Checks carried out on the English language sources: I resolved some minor close paraphrasing from one source. I'd recommend a slightly shorter version of ALT2: Harriastalk 17:50, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
A significant portion of the "Aircraft" section (which is unsourced in the article) appears to have been copied from
this source.
Nikkimaria (
talk) 00:08, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
That information was added after the review. I've currently removed it: it is already covered lightly in the article, and as far as I'm concerned, the addition goes into too much technical detail. Given that, I'm happy to approve the article once more in it's original form, but it needs monitoring in case the information is re-added. Harriastalk 00:47, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PumpkinSkytalk 03:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
... that LOT Flight 16 from New York to Warsaw landed safely after the landing gear failed to deploy?
Created/expanded by
Ajh1492 (
talk). Self nom at 17:37, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Can we add links to the hook? I'd also suggest stubbing or creating an article on the pilot,
Tadeusz Wrona, and adding it here (it would be a two-article DYK nom then). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
talk to me 21:52, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Proposed Alt hook to incorporate the Tadeusz Wrona DYK:
I closed the merger discussion as "no merge", so the article is no longer festooned with that problematic template. Time for a review! --
Orlady (
talk) 03:21, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
I've reviewed the articles for dates, length, and hook fact sources. I "struck out" some items in the hooks that are not supported by the articles and sources. Otherwise the hooks are good. I've not checked for plagiarism issues yet. --
Orlady (
talk) 06:08, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Checks carried out on the English language sources: I resolved some minor close paraphrasing from one source. I'd recommend a slightly shorter version of ALT2: Harriastalk 17:50, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
A significant portion of the "Aircraft" section (which is unsourced in the article) appears to have been copied from
this source.
Nikkimaria (
talk) 00:08, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
That information was added after the review. I've currently removed it: it is already covered lightly in the article, and as far as I'm concerned, the addition goes into too much technical detail. Given that, I'm happy to approve the article once more in it's original form, but it needs monitoring in case the information is re-added. Harriastalk 00:47, 10 December 2011 (UTC)