This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Witchcraft article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 45 days

	Witchcraft was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 3, 2006 Good article nominee Listed June 15, 2009 Good article reassessment Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

This   level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Anthropology High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Paranormal High‑importance This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Women in Religion High‑importance This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Mythology High‑importance This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Horror Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Religion Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Skepticism Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Occult High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Psychology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Countering systemic bias This article is supported by the Countering systemic bias WikiProject, which provides a central location to counter systemic bias on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.Countering systemic biasWikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic biasTemplate:WikiProject Countering systemic biasCountering systemic bias articles

Current consensus on article scope: This is a broad-concept article. Subjects not specifically covered in other articles must be included here, including presence in folklore and variation between cultures/regions. Topics covered in other articles, such as neopagan witchcraft or specific regional views of witchcraft, should be introduced briefly with a link to those articles. Current consensus on organization: This article was historically prone to regional bias. Content pertaining to particular regions was spun out in summer/autumn of 2023. Current consensus on the form of the first paragraph: The first paragraph should begin with the specific sentences agreed on in this RfC

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Text and/or other creative content from Contemporary witchcraft was copied or moved into Witchcraft on 16 March 2017. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Christianization#Colonial era (16th–19th centuries)|Christianization]] The anchor (#Colonial era (16th–19th centuries)) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

On 19 July 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Witchcraft to Witchcraft (classical). The result of the discussion was not moved.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

The sub-sub-section for Witchcraft#Ancient Roman world is entirety duplicative of material in the European_witchcraft#Antiquity section. It is, by itself, as long as most of the other regions covered in this article, which seems unbalanced. It has been restored to this article twice without explanation, description, or suggestion of what it adds to coverage by being repeated in this article. - Darker Dreams ( talk) 23:39, 4 October 2023 (UTC) reply

• @ Asarlaí and Netherzone: Seems reasonable to remove this and maybe preserve some information by adding it in summarized form after the fact, in chronological order, to what remains about Europe. Organizationally, this section doesn't belong here any more, as it makes no sense to cover Europe, and then also only Ancient Rome—what about the rest of Europe (in time and in space)? I don't oppose removal.— Alalch E. 01:37, 13 October 2023 (UTC) reply

What do others think of moving the word alleged in the first sentence?

...is the use of alleged supernatural powers... Vs my suggestion: ...is the alleged use of supernatural powers...

Its subtle, but I believe this is more in line with the article Malibu Sapphire ( talk) 03:21, 5 October 2023 (UTC) reply

The opening sentence was determined by RFC, and my understanding is it takes more to change things determined by RFC. - Darker Dreams ( talk) 06:23, 10 October 2023 (UTC) reply

I agree that "the alleged use" is better than "the use of alleged", so I'll go ahead and be bold and make that change. I don't think the existence of the RFC should tie us down in procedural hurdles, but if anyone has a substantial objection, they can feel free to revert. Red Rock Canyon ( talk) 22:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC) reply

It is the supernatural powers that are alleged. This is because we cannot say in WikiVoice that supernatural powers are real. It is not the use that is alleged, it is the powers that are alleged. This is specified in Chetsford's closure of the RfC above, per discussion. Netherzone ( talk) 23:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC) reply

I think they are both alleged. Witchcraft isn't real. Witches were accused of using magic. It isn't like the alleged witches said "I did do something, but it was not supernatural". C͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏u͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏r͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏s͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏ed Peace ( talk) 06:00, 14 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Looking for a quote I remember from a source but don't seem to have saved anywhere and found this;

• The Practice of Witchcraft and the Changing Patterns of its Paraphernalia in the Light of Technologically Produced Goods as Presented by Livingstone Museum, 1930s - 1973 Friday Mufuzi Lusaka National Museum, Zambia [1]
  • "The paper demonstrates that western consumer goods were not only used by the general populace to transform their lifestyle from the traditional to western style but also by witchcraft practitioners to enhance their power and authority through the ‘modernisation’ of their paraphernalia thereby making them more potent"
  • "the paper posits the thesis that witchcraft is a theory of power and authority and practitioners believed that it possessed energies that could protect them against any kind of harm from their perceived enemies, and that it had the power to protect whatever wealth had been accumulated from destruction by supposed enemies"
  • "Studies on witchcraft in colonial Africa in general and Zambia in particular have focused on explaining the phenomenon in terms of the primitiveness of the practice and its practitioners.1 Most probably, this was done in order to justify colonialism in the area. During this era, the western world considered itself duty bound to carry the burden of ‘civilizing’ Africans through the introduction of western civilization, which in essence meant Africans embracing European lifestyles and abandoning their indigenous culture and belief systems, including witchcraft, replacing it with Christianity."
  • "Peter Geschiere’s study on witchcraft in postcolonial Cameroon [...] lucidly posits that witchcraft covers perceptions of underhand efforts made by the powerful to accumulate resources and wealth, and secret attempts by the weak in society to equalise or eliminate such perceived inequalities in power through occult means.1"

- Darker Dreams ( talk) 14:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Through my work I have recently found myself incidentally fascinated by African witchcraft and I'm slowly amassing a body of work to update the Witchcraft in Africa article. I've been monitoring the talk page for this article for quite some time — your extensive patronage to this page I've long admired — and I feel that I should flag this now. Afterthought: you may enjoy reading this article. Jondvdsn1 ( talk) 12:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC) reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue watchers of this page may be interested in. - Darker Dreams ( talk) 19:20, 14 October 2023 (UTC) reply

I know there's been a lot of discussion of the lede, so please forgive me if this is out of turn, but to my mind, the opening sentence involves a mistake: "Witchcraft, as most commonly understood in both historical and present-day communities, is the use of alleged supernatural powers of magic." When believers in witchcraft say, "That is witchcraft," they are not saying that someone is making use of allegedly supernatural powers. They are saying that someone is making use of supernatural powers, period.

It is a bit understandable why someone added 'allegedly'. I think we can all agree that part of the challenge of getting this right is that we want to describe and define something that only exists according to certain worldviews, without saying on behalf of Wikipedia that this thing is real. So we need to say something like: "According to certain worldviews, witchcraft is...." There is a temptation to hedge even further, to distance the encyclopedia from any implication that witchcraft is real, by adding an adverb like "allegedly". But this actually makes the statement incorrect. When you write, "As most commonly understood in worldview X, [ ... ]," the words after the comma describe the world according to that worldview.

For the sake of accuracy, as well as clarity and brevity, the word 'alleged' should, in my opinion, be removed from the first sentence.

Compare the opening line of the article on God: "In monotheistic thought, God is usually viewed as the supreme being, creator, and principal object of faith." It would be a mistake to change this to: "In monotheistic thought, God is usually viewed as the allegedly supreme being, creator, and principal object of faith." In monotheistic thought, God is not merely the allegedly supreme being; according to that kind of thought, God really is the supreme being.

I obviously want to respect the democratic process employed above, and if that has to be prioritized, so be it, but please reconsider. Omphaloscope talk 17:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC) reply

I tend to agree with Malibu Sapphire, Red Rock Canyon, and Cursed Peace that "the alleged use" makes more sense than "the use of alleged" because that way it covers both people who genuinely believe to be using "alleged" supernatural powers and those who are falsely alleged to use supernatural powers. I personally don't think the switch would imply that witchcraft-derived supernatural powers are objectively real. Pliny the Elderberry ( talk) 17:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC) reply

The word "alleged" was added in this diff: special:diff/1166760498. In this edit, an editor defended the addition of "alleged": special:diff/1179714382. I mentioned the original edit in this discussion: Talk:Witchcraft/Archive 6#The Reality of Witchcraft. The concern of editors who add the word "alleged" in this place is that if we were not to add it, we would be saying that magic is real. It's literally a forced disclaimer. A better mockup analogy with the God article sentence than the one you've made would be: "In monotheistic thought, God is usually viewed as the alleged supreme being, alleged creator, and principal object of faith." We must allegedly add "alleged" before "supreme being" and "creator" because otherwise we would be saying that there really is a supreme being and a creator. — Alalch E. 17:40, 12 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Its complex, but we do need to avoid saying magic is real. Slatersteven ( talk) 12:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC) reply