This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
An editor under the ip 88.136.208.70 how do i link those? added the above graph. But i am unable to find the source of the data he used to parse it. I would gladly update my scripts to update it, but without that information i am unable to, and have therefore decided to remove it from the article until the original author can help me with it, or update it himself. -- Hagnat ( talk) 22:07, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
@ Ânes-pur-sàng, MatheusGamezi, Wvictor07, and Albertoleoncio: as we near the 3th month since the first case, the graphs have too much data to show. I am thinking about grouping them by week, this way things becomes more manageable and less cluthered. If someone wants to see fine grained growth, they can see the timeline tables, which additionally shows data by state. What you guys think ? -- Hagnat ( talk) 12:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
@ CJK09: as you can see, i had a brief discussion with the main contributors of this page, and there was no opposition to group data, since the timeline tables show the same information and more. -- Hagnat ( talk) 22:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
@ Hagnat: Is it a viable option to generate the graphs outside of Wikipedia and use .svg files to display the data? I think python certainly has a way to group the data into a bar chart like we want it to. The down side is that one would need to use another programming language (and a different set of tools) for that. -- Wvictor07 ( talk) 22:18, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
I am going to be honest here. I am getting tired of the incompetent job that the Ministry of Health is going with the shared data. Not only the current format is clunky, running on a closed source file, but it also contains a LOT of invalid data that needs to be sanitized -- such as duplicate rows, and rows that point to no valid region/state/city. I just wasted another two hours fixing their incompetence. AGAIN. It kind of frustrates me from continuing on updating this. Maybe i should start using the data from the guys at BrasilIO. Let them sanitize the data for me. /rant -- Hagnat ( talk) 14:58, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil/Statistics has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
4-day update. updated: all graphs except for one external svg (logscale graph). not updated: external tables and the external svg. Brunoff ( talk) 03:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
This article documents a
current event. Information may change rapidly as the event progresses, and initial news reports may be
unreliable. The
latest updates to this article
may not reflect the most current information. |
Hi @ Brunoff: please do not delete the yAxisMax and xAxisMin functions as these help prevent data backlogs and negative values from disrupting the continuity of the graph (please, see the Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Argentina page to have an appreciation on how these metrics prevent data outliers from disrupting the graphs). Also, keep in mind logarithms of negative values produce errors therefore you will see some disruptions in the logarithmic graphs if you decide to include negative values. Thank you. Joplin201017 ( talk)
The following warning appears on the page when you preview it:
In charts and tables, I suggest switching their source data from daily numbers to something more practical like weekly or monthly numbers. If any time-sensitive data isn't going to be updated, then delete it. Jroberson108 ( talk) 16:09, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
<center>...</center>
, which I had replaced in the artcile a couple of weeks ago and readded by you. Please update whatever script you are using to use <div class="center"></div>
instead of center tags.This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
An editor under the ip 88.136.208.70 how do i link those? added the above graph. But i am unable to find the source of the data he used to parse it. I would gladly update my scripts to update it, but without that information i am unable to, and have therefore decided to remove it from the article until the original author can help me with it, or update it himself. -- Hagnat ( talk) 22:07, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
@ Ânes-pur-sàng, MatheusGamezi, Wvictor07, and Albertoleoncio: as we near the 3th month since the first case, the graphs have too much data to show. I am thinking about grouping them by week, this way things becomes more manageable and less cluthered. If someone wants to see fine grained growth, they can see the timeline tables, which additionally shows data by state. What you guys think ? -- Hagnat ( talk) 12:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
@ CJK09: as you can see, i had a brief discussion with the main contributors of this page, and there was no opposition to group data, since the timeline tables show the same information and more. -- Hagnat ( talk) 22:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
@ Hagnat: Is it a viable option to generate the graphs outside of Wikipedia and use .svg files to display the data? I think python certainly has a way to group the data into a bar chart like we want it to. The down side is that one would need to use another programming language (and a different set of tools) for that. -- Wvictor07 ( talk) 22:18, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
I am going to be honest here. I am getting tired of the incompetent job that the Ministry of Health is going with the shared data. Not only the current format is clunky, running on a closed source file, but it also contains a LOT of invalid data that needs to be sanitized -- such as duplicate rows, and rows that point to no valid region/state/city. I just wasted another two hours fixing their incompetence. AGAIN. It kind of frustrates me from continuing on updating this. Maybe i should start using the data from the guys at BrasilIO. Let them sanitize the data for me. /rant -- Hagnat ( talk) 14:58, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil/Statistics has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
4-day update. updated: all graphs except for one external svg (logscale graph). not updated: external tables and the external svg. Brunoff ( talk) 03:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
This article documents a
current event. Information may change rapidly as the event progresses, and initial news reports may be
unreliable. The
latest updates to this article
may not reflect the most current information. |
Hi @ Brunoff: please do not delete the yAxisMax and xAxisMin functions as these help prevent data backlogs and negative values from disrupting the continuity of the graph (please, see the Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Argentina page to have an appreciation on how these metrics prevent data outliers from disrupting the graphs). Also, keep in mind logarithms of negative values produce errors therefore you will see some disruptions in the logarithmic graphs if you decide to include negative values. Thank you. Joplin201017 ( talk)
The following warning appears on the page when you preview it:
In charts and tables, I suggest switching their source data from daily numbers to something more practical like weekly or monthly numbers. If any time-sensitive data isn't going to be updated, then delete it. Jroberson108 ( talk) 16:09, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
<center>...</center>
, which I had replaced in the artcile a couple of weeks ago and readded by you. Please update whatever script you are using to use <div class="center"></div>
instead of center tags.