This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Simon Baron-Cohen article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find medical sources:  Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 45 days

This   level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). University of Oxford Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Psychology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Autism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Disability Simon Baron-Cohen is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[British Psychological Society#Chartership|BPS Chartered Psychologist]] The anchor (#Chartership) has been deleted. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

• However, his empathizing–systemizing theory, views on autism advocacy, and views on autism and sex differences are highly controversial. I added a reliable source for that claim.

• According to Time magazine, his views on systemising traits had "earned him the ire of some parents of autistic children, who complain that he underestimates their families' suffering". I moved that to the "Criticism" section

• James McGrath has criticized the autism-spectrum quotient, writing that the score increases if one indicates interest in mathematics, and decreases if one indicates interest in literature or art. Reliable source from a university lecturer, published in The Conversation

• Darin Hayton, a historian of science at Haverford College, claims that Baron-Cohen's method to destigmatize autism by retrodiagnosing famous figures is not appropriate or effective. University professor, Haverford college.

• Writing for the Autism Society of America, Jill Escher has criticized Simon Baron-Cohen's support for neurodiversity, claiming that many autistic people lack basic life skills and will need lifelong care because of autism, and claimed his definition of autism was too broad. She does say that there are too many kinds of autism.

Ylevental ( talk) 12:18, 11 May 2019 (UTC) reply

One point first of all while I deal with the others, and that's Jill Escher is not writing for the Autism Society of America. The ASA has distanced itself from the San Francisco chapter. She is also not a reliable source on her own. 2001:8003:5901:B400:E5AA:C138:962C:B23D ( talk) 01:54, 12 May 2019 (UTC) reply

The ASA criticized Jill Escher, but the San Francisco chapter is still recognized as an official affiliate on their site http://www.autism-society.org/about-the-autism-society/affiliate-network/ Ylevental ( talk) 02:05, 12 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Not by them. 2001:8003:5901:B400:E5AA:C138:962C:B23D ( talk) 02:07, 12 May 2019 (UTC) reply

What I mean by that is that they haven't got around to removing San Francisco yet. They will, unless Escher resigns. 2001:8003:5901:B400:E5AA:C138:962C:B23D ( talk) 02:11, 12 May 2019 (UTC) reply

We should wait for them to remove it first. Ylevental ( talk) 02:14, 12 May 2019 (UTC) reply

No we should not because of the presence of the criticism you identified. It shows a disconnect therefore you can't inherit ASA's notability to Escher. It stays out as not notable. 2001:8003:5901:B400:E5AA:C138:962C:B23D ( talk) 02:21, 12 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Do not re-add this. Prove that Escher is notable without using the ASA or that other group. 2001:8003:5901:B400:E5AA:C138:962C:B23D ( talk) 02:23, 12 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Oh and stop marking it a "minor" edit. It's not. That's an issue in itself. 2001:8003:5901:B400:E5AA:C138:962C:B23D ( talk) 02:27, 12 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Elliot covers the retrodiagnosis issue adequately. There is no need to add anyone to that as it adds undue weight. Notability of Hayton is also questionable as he does not have an article on WP. 2001:8003:5901:B400:E5AA:C138:962C:B23D ( talk) 01:59, 12 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Okay, that's fine. Ylevental ( talk) 02:05, 12 May 2019 (UTC) reply

This article is recognised as part of medical matters on WP. The Conversation is therefore not reliable in that sphere, unless the writer of the article is medically qualified. McGrath has no such qualifications. Therefore, that goes. 2001:8003:5901:B400:E5AA:C138:962C:B23D ( talk) 02:09, 12 May 2019 (UTC) reply

The AQ is a psychological tool, not an objective diagnostic. Ylevental ( talk) 02:18, 12 May 2019 (UTC) reply

That's irrelevant to the issue at hand. 2001:8003:5901:B400:E5AA:C138:962C:B23D ( talk) 02:21, 12 May 2019 (UTC) reply

I'll leave Time alone but I've changed the first one because it added things that weren't there in the source. The only two controversies mentioned were the extreme male brain and the merger of autism and Aspergers in the DSM-5. 2001:8003:5901:B400:E5AA:C138:962C:B23D ( talk) 02:21, 12 May 2019 (UTC) reply

I deleted the part on B-C theories being controversial, not because they are not, but because the reference did not provide any evidence of that, and is not enough to say that something is controversial to make it so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aristotele1982 ( talk • contribs) 15:46, 2 June 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Aristotele1982: I added more details. The specific examples are found lower in the article Ylevental ( talk) 21:48, 2 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Maybe it's me, but it looks like the entire part on criticisms is based heavily on feminist scholarship and not on independent research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aristotele1982 ( talk • contribs) 15:54, 2 June 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Aristotele1982: Just to let you know, I added another source in this section to see if this source will be worth it. Ylevental ( talk) 21:57, 2 June 2019 (UTC) reply

I agree. Simon Baron-Cohen may be somewhat controversial, but he is not that controversial. He is a highly respected researcher and the length of his criticisms section is WP:UNDUE. Let's try to cut out the criticisms by non-scientists. -- Wikiman2718 ( talk) 17:22, 16 August 2019 (UTC) reply

He is controversial. https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/neurodiverse-age/202108/why-autistic-people-are-worried-spectrum-10k And hence has paused the study due to the outcry from the community. https://spectrum10k.org/statement-10th-september/ Characterizing members of the Autistic community as "feminist scholarship" seems inappropriate in light of these events. Mrrealtime ( talk) 18:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC) reply

This article will soon need updating. It was reported on the news today (Tuesday August 24 2021) that Simon Baron-Cohen is to be linked with a huge study of autistic people, looking at over 10,000 autistic people. He was on the Radio 4 Today programme today. If Wikipedia is to maintain its status as the world's most up-to-date encyclopaedia, it will need to follow the progress of this study carefully. YTKJ ( talk) 19:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Yes, it's called Spectrum 10K. Here's a summary from the University of Cambridge. Martinevans123 ( talk) 19:52, 24 August 2021 (UTC) reply

The inclusion of the wick seemed spurious, particularly for a biography of a living person, and could have easily been read as an indication that Baron-Cohen is associated with the eugenics movement. I've gone ahead and removed it as potentially libelous. 2001:56A:FB4D:5200:B62E:99FF:FEA3:D19A ( talk) 01:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The first paragraph of the lead ends with "the key test of which was published in 2015" (emphasis mine), but I'm left wondering whether that should be "test" or "text". In addition, naming that key test/text wouldn't be out of place, I believe. What do others think? The Crab Who Played With The Sea ( talk) 16:48, 31 July 2023 (UTC) reply