Resident Evil 7: Biohazard has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 22, 2017. ( Reviewed version). |
Resident Evil 7: Biohazard received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
A fact from Resident Evil 7: Biohazard appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 15 June 2017 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
It's hard to pinpoint whether it's called VII or 7 because the on-screen title has the game stylized as EVII. How clever... Thank you! ( talk) 12:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Every single place I can find, including the trailer on the PlayStation YouTube channel and Resident Evil's own channel have it named as 'Resident Evil 7 biohazard'. I think that, at the very least, the article should be called 'Resident Evil 7: Biohazard'. 187.21.129.120 ( talk) 02:15, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
OK. It's officially called 7: Biohazard now. I still really like what they did with its logo, though. :-) Thank you! ( talk) 18:46, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
According to the Senior Marketing Director at Capcom, the team behind Resident Evil 7 have been working on the game before P.T. came out.
https://twitter.com/OnlyOneT/status/742591710757195776?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
http://www.gamesradar.com/many-are-calling-resident-evil-7-the-new-silent-hills-but-its-so-much-more-than-that/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.88.93.248 ( talk) 21:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
I disagree when they say they aren't copying it. Thank you! ( talk) 13:42, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
I have removed the information regarding Albert Wesker's alleged performance in Resident Evil 7: Biohazard. While the sources given state that someone found data in the game suggesting there will be a character called 'Albert' in Resident Evil 7. There is no further conclusive evidence or official statement from CapCom given whether this will in fact be Albert Wesker.
Unless there is something more concrete, Wesker's appearance in Resi 7 is speculation at this point. Three sources based on rumors and speculation do not classify as reliable sources. Rumors and speculative theories from un-reliable sources are considered original research. Wesker could in fact be in the game, but we would need something official and clear to validate this. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 06:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
The plot is missing some very important parts and very important imformation. Please add this mising imformation (i can do it myself anyway) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.166.160.57 ( talk) 23:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
It has little to do with the other Resident Evil stories at all, in my view. PeterMan844 ( talk) 10:55, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
"[...] decreased resolution and physical discomfort cited as its chief offenses." What does this even mean? People got physically sick from playing a horror game (which isn't a legitimate criticism)? Or does it mean the game's elements triggered epileptic responses in a large number of people? citation needed please 73.247.148.84 ( talk) 04:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
I made this edit that got reverted. I didn't really understand the edit summary in the revert, but I made that clarification because the current wording seems to suggest that the Xbox version supports the PSVR. -- uKER ( talk) 01:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Just like in the discussion right above this one, I just made an edit which got reverted for dubious reasons despite a justification being specified in my edit summary. I don't have a problem with you saying the forecast has to be on a separate paragraph, but fixing that would have taken a mere hit of the enter key. You reverting me arguing that "the previous text flows better" (a completely subjective argument) only calls my attention to the fact that it was you who wrote the previous text. My issue with your text is that it says the game was forecast to get a given number of sales, but doesn't specify who made that forecast. For what your text's worth, the forecast could have been made by Billy, who cleans the toilets at Gamestop. Being the second time it's happened, it would be greatly appreciated if you could take it easier with the trigger finger to revert other people's edits just because they've edited what you wrote. Cheers. -- uKER ( talk) 22:26, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Freikorp ( talk · contribs) 03:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Be advised rather than bringing up any minor issues I will just fix them myself. If you're unhappy with any changes I make simply revert them and we can instead discuss the issue here. Also feel free to reply to my concerns as they come in; don't feel like you have to wait for the entire review to be finished.
Freikorp (
talk) 03:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Well done on the article overall. Placing this one on hold so issues can be addressed. Freikorp ( talk) 12:11, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
After the release of Resident Evil 2 remake, there will be two games using RE Engine. I don't think that redirect to RE7 is a correct way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Equalent ( talk • contribs) 20:21, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
A relatively new contributor has recently added most of the episodes from the game's DLCs Banned Footage Vol. 1 and Banned Footage Vol. 2 to the Plot section. Considering the game's later DLCs Not a Hero and End of Zoe, which are longer and more plot-orientated, have only ever been included, should those from Banned Footage be eligible? Wikibenboy94 ( talk) 23:21, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Right now, in a footnote on the game's title, the article includes
Stylized as RESIDENT EVII. biohazard. Known in Japan as Biohazard 7: Resident Evil ( Japanese: バイオハザード7 レジデント イービル, Hepburn: Baiohazādo Sebun Rejidento Ībiru), stylized as BIOHA7.ARD resident evil.
My thought is no, per
MOS:TMSTYLE: not only does trying to indicate the VII/7 tucked away in the logo run afoul of a guideline against colorization, attempts to emulate font choices, or other elaborate effects
, but also the suggestion that When a stylization appears only in a logo rather than within text (in either primary or independent reliable sources), it generally does not need to be mentioned at the top of the article.
— in running text, the game is universally referred to as "Resident Evil 7" (or "Biohazard 7"), not "Resident EVII." in some attempt to replicate the logo. For example,
the official site only ever uses "Resident Evil 7". With that in mind, I removed the "stylized as…" stuff. However, my edit was quickly undone. So: should these "stylized as" messages be included on this page? —
Kawnhr (
talk) 18:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
— Resident Evil 7: Biohazard is a survival horror game viewed from the first-person – the second game in the series and the first main line game to use such a perspective.
(emphasis mine)
Depending on whether Dead Aim counts (the shooting is in first person) it's at least two or three titles (the two Gun Survivor games). I would probably prefer just removing that part as it adds nothing to the article 2A02:908:1068:8500:0:0:0:6B09 ( talk) 15:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Resident Evil 7: Biohazard has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 22, 2017. ( Reviewed version). |
Resident Evil 7: Biohazard received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
A fact from Resident Evil 7: Biohazard appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 15 June 2017 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
It's hard to pinpoint whether it's called VII or 7 because the on-screen title has the game stylized as EVII. How clever... Thank you! ( talk) 12:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Every single place I can find, including the trailer on the PlayStation YouTube channel and Resident Evil's own channel have it named as 'Resident Evil 7 biohazard'. I think that, at the very least, the article should be called 'Resident Evil 7: Biohazard'. 187.21.129.120 ( talk) 02:15, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
OK. It's officially called 7: Biohazard now. I still really like what they did with its logo, though. :-) Thank you! ( talk) 18:46, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
According to the Senior Marketing Director at Capcom, the team behind Resident Evil 7 have been working on the game before P.T. came out.
https://twitter.com/OnlyOneT/status/742591710757195776?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
http://www.gamesradar.com/many-are-calling-resident-evil-7-the-new-silent-hills-but-its-so-much-more-than-that/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.88.93.248 ( talk) 21:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
I disagree when they say they aren't copying it. Thank you! ( talk) 13:42, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
I have removed the information regarding Albert Wesker's alleged performance in Resident Evil 7: Biohazard. While the sources given state that someone found data in the game suggesting there will be a character called 'Albert' in Resident Evil 7. There is no further conclusive evidence or official statement from CapCom given whether this will in fact be Albert Wesker.
Unless there is something more concrete, Wesker's appearance in Resi 7 is speculation at this point. Three sources based on rumors and speculation do not classify as reliable sources. Rumors and speculative theories from un-reliable sources are considered original research. Wesker could in fact be in the game, but we would need something official and clear to validate this. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 06:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
The plot is missing some very important parts and very important imformation. Please add this mising imformation (i can do it myself anyway) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.166.160.57 ( talk) 23:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
It has little to do with the other Resident Evil stories at all, in my view. PeterMan844 ( talk) 10:55, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
"[...] decreased resolution and physical discomfort cited as its chief offenses." What does this even mean? People got physically sick from playing a horror game (which isn't a legitimate criticism)? Or does it mean the game's elements triggered epileptic responses in a large number of people? citation needed please 73.247.148.84 ( talk) 04:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
I made this edit that got reverted. I didn't really understand the edit summary in the revert, but I made that clarification because the current wording seems to suggest that the Xbox version supports the PSVR. -- uKER ( talk) 01:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Just like in the discussion right above this one, I just made an edit which got reverted for dubious reasons despite a justification being specified in my edit summary. I don't have a problem with you saying the forecast has to be on a separate paragraph, but fixing that would have taken a mere hit of the enter key. You reverting me arguing that "the previous text flows better" (a completely subjective argument) only calls my attention to the fact that it was you who wrote the previous text. My issue with your text is that it says the game was forecast to get a given number of sales, but doesn't specify who made that forecast. For what your text's worth, the forecast could have been made by Billy, who cleans the toilets at Gamestop. Being the second time it's happened, it would be greatly appreciated if you could take it easier with the trigger finger to revert other people's edits just because they've edited what you wrote. Cheers. -- uKER ( talk) 22:26, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Freikorp ( talk · contribs) 03:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Be advised rather than bringing up any minor issues I will just fix them myself. If you're unhappy with any changes I make simply revert them and we can instead discuss the issue here. Also feel free to reply to my concerns as they come in; don't feel like you have to wait for the entire review to be finished.
Freikorp (
talk) 03:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Well done on the article overall. Placing this one on hold so issues can be addressed. Freikorp ( talk) 12:11, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
After the release of Resident Evil 2 remake, there will be two games using RE Engine. I don't think that redirect to RE7 is a correct way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Equalent ( talk • contribs) 20:21, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
A relatively new contributor has recently added most of the episodes from the game's DLCs Banned Footage Vol. 1 and Banned Footage Vol. 2 to the Plot section. Considering the game's later DLCs Not a Hero and End of Zoe, which are longer and more plot-orientated, have only ever been included, should those from Banned Footage be eligible? Wikibenboy94 ( talk) 23:21, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Right now, in a footnote on the game's title, the article includes
Stylized as RESIDENT EVII. biohazard. Known in Japan as Biohazard 7: Resident Evil ( Japanese: バイオハザード7 レジデント イービル, Hepburn: Baiohazādo Sebun Rejidento Ībiru), stylized as BIOHA7.ARD resident evil.
My thought is no, per
MOS:TMSTYLE: not only does trying to indicate the VII/7 tucked away in the logo run afoul of a guideline against colorization, attempts to emulate font choices, or other elaborate effects
, but also the suggestion that When a stylization appears only in a logo rather than within text (in either primary or independent reliable sources), it generally does not need to be mentioned at the top of the article.
— in running text, the game is universally referred to as "Resident Evil 7" (or "Biohazard 7"), not "Resident EVII." in some attempt to replicate the logo. For example,
the official site only ever uses "Resident Evil 7". With that in mind, I removed the "stylized as…" stuff. However, my edit was quickly undone. So: should these "stylized as" messages be included on this page? —
Kawnhr (
talk) 18:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
— Resident Evil 7: Biohazard is a survival horror game viewed from the first-person – the second game in the series and the first main line game to use such a perspective.
(emphasis mine)
Depending on whether Dead Aim counts (the shooting is in first person) it's at least two or three titles (the two Gun Survivor games). I would probably prefer just removing that part as it adds nothing to the article 2A02:908:1068:8500:0:0:0:6B09 ( talk) 15:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)