The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I'm wondering how much truth there is in the statement that "Many people are not happy about the change of the invading country and this review points out why[16]"? The citation and "this review" both link to something from a news blog called Libertas. I don't object to the article being linked there, but I do find the wording and the way it was presented to be a bit of a problem. How do we know how much a review from a web site with a clear political bent really reflect public opinion, and how much is "many people"?
Per WP:FILMPLOT, the plot summary should be between 400-700 words. The recent expansions of the plot have violated this and need to stop. The edit war over the plot needs to end and involved editors need to discuss the subject here. --- The Old Jacobite The '45 18:38, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
I have fully protected this page for three days, Zmaher ( talk · contribs) and TheOldJacobite ( talk · contribs) I highly suggest some discussion and agreement regarding the length of the plot before mass reverting each other, note that you have both crossed the 3RR line today. -- kelapstick( bainuu) 01:59, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
I see the category Films set in North Korea is on the article page. This film is not set in North Korea. All of the film takes place in Washington, US. -- Mjrmtg ( talk) 01:40, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Red Dawn (2012 film). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:22, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
In the main section, paragraph 2 is a link to MGM's page talking about 'Consortium ownership and financial troubles'. Digging thru the pages history I found the missing section ( https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer&oldid=633630007#Consortium_ownership_and_financial_troubles) but wasn't sure whether to edit this link or do something on the MGM's page. (outside my pay grade) I leave it up to someone else. Xitit ( talk) 17:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I'm wondering how much truth there is in the statement that "Many people are not happy about the change of the invading country and this review points out why[16]"? The citation and "this review" both link to something from a news blog called Libertas. I don't object to the article being linked there, but I do find the wording and the way it was presented to be a bit of a problem. How do we know how much a review from a web site with a clear political bent really reflect public opinion, and how much is "many people"?
Per WP:FILMPLOT, the plot summary should be between 400-700 words. The recent expansions of the plot have violated this and need to stop. The edit war over the plot needs to end and involved editors need to discuss the subject here. --- The Old Jacobite The '45 18:38, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
I have fully protected this page for three days, Zmaher ( talk · contribs) and TheOldJacobite ( talk · contribs) I highly suggest some discussion and agreement regarding the length of the plot before mass reverting each other, note that you have both crossed the 3RR line today. -- kelapstick( bainuu) 01:59, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
I see the category Films set in North Korea is on the article page. This film is not set in North Korea. All of the film takes place in Washington, US. -- Mjrmtg ( talk) 01:40, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Red Dawn (2012 film). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:22, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
In the main section, paragraph 2 is a link to MGM's page talking about 'Consortium ownership and financial troubles'. Digging thru the pages history I found the missing section ( https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer&oldid=633630007#Consortium_ownership_and_financial_troubles) but wasn't sure whether to edit this link or do something on the MGM's page. (outside my pay grade) I leave it up to someone else. Xitit ( talk) 17:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)