This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
The citations for the list of wax figures goes off the edge of my phone screen. Could it be resolved like this?
[1] Alduin2000 ( talk) 21:57, 8 April 2018 (UTC) </ref>
I see what you mean, perhaps the list as is could be moved to it's own list page and a smaller list of notable figures that are more easily kept control of and verified left here. What do you think? Alduin2000 ( talk) 16:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
References
Why Catriona Gray is not included on the list of wax figure in Singapore column? Rogeliomnl24 ( talk) 01:30, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Please remove Catriona Gray there, instead put in Singapore Branch column, thanks! Rogeliomnl24 ( talk) 01:38, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, any watchers around?
I suggest we delete this part of the article. As the article states, there's no reasonable criteria. Odds are that anyone who has a waxfigure also has a WP-article. This is just WP:FANCRUFT, and can be handled with one or more categories instead. This info belongs on org websites.
Also... A separate column for Marvel? Please no. Not that I don't like Marvel. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 18:34, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Or just replace it with "Main article: List of wax figures displayed at Madame Tussauds museums" Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 18:39, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
It's been 24h and participants are unanimous. I'm doing it. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 21:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Your view is welcome. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 09:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
The citations for the list of wax figures goes off the edge of my phone screen. Could it be resolved like this?
[1] Alduin2000 ( talk) 21:57, 8 April 2018 (UTC) </ref>
I see what you mean, perhaps the list as is could be moved to it's own list page and a smaller list of notable figures that are more easily kept control of and verified left here. What do you think? Alduin2000 ( talk) 16:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
References
Why Catriona Gray is not included on the list of wax figure in Singapore column? Rogeliomnl24 ( talk) 01:30, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Please remove Catriona Gray there, instead put in Singapore Branch column, thanks! Rogeliomnl24 ( talk) 01:38, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, any watchers around?
I suggest we delete this part of the article. As the article states, there's no reasonable criteria. Odds are that anyone who has a waxfigure also has a WP-article. This is just WP:FANCRUFT, and can be handled with one or more categories instead. This info belongs on org websites.
Also... A separate column for Marvel? Please no. Not that I don't like Marvel. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 18:34, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Or just replace it with "Main article: List of wax figures displayed at Madame Tussauds museums" Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 18:39, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
It's been 24h and participants are unanimous. I'm doing it. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 21:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Your view is welcome. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 09:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)