This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Toronto supported by WikiProject Wikipedia and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.
Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
on 14:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Brawkfaux, Shainamgrace, Mbeach5.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 00:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Going to delete the sentence attributing this to Thomasius. I thought it was an interesting way to describe the phenomenon so I went digging for the source. Whoever added here probably got the info from this Hedgehog Review article (archived, https://web.archive.org/web/20120504211249/http://www.iasc-culture.org/THR/THR_article_2012_Spring_Wellmon.php). Jumping from the citation, archive.org has the review in question (here, https://archive.org/details/sim_albany-law-journal_1702-03_4_4), starting on page 202. Reading this you can see the nasty text that Wellmon quotes as Thomasius' are the reviewers' words/opinions, and they continue that Thomasius' writing actually argues there is value in the "disease". I couldn't figure out how to re-attribute without making it clunky, unless we want to say "Many Hands" said this. Musicandnintendo ( talk) 00:10, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Given the clear danger of information overload, might not this article be spilt in two? The first part: Information Overload up to the year 2000, and the other: Data Overload in the Twenty First Century? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.166.182 ( talk) 09:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Are those topics different? I have doubts. Right now Information overload even mentions information explosion as one of its alt names in the lead. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Toronto supported by WikiProject Wikipedia and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.
Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
on 14:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Brawkfaux, Shainamgrace, Mbeach5.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 00:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Going to delete the sentence attributing this to Thomasius. I thought it was an interesting way to describe the phenomenon so I went digging for the source. Whoever added here probably got the info from this Hedgehog Review article (archived, https://web.archive.org/web/20120504211249/http://www.iasc-culture.org/THR/THR_article_2012_Spring_Wellmon.php). Jumping from the citation, archive.org has the review in question (here, https://archive.org/details/sim_albany-law-journal_1702-03_4_4), starting on page 202. Reading this you can see the nasty text that Wellmon quotes as Thomasius' are the reviewers' words/opinions, and they continue that Thomasius' writing actually argues there is value in the "disease". I couldn't figure out how to re-attribute without making it clunky, unless we want to say "Many Hands" said this. Musicandnintendo ( talk) 00:10, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Given the clear danger of information overload, might not this article be spilt in two? The first part: Information Overload up to the year 2000, and the other: Data Overload in the Twenty First Century? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.166.182 ( talk) 09:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Are those topics different? I have doubts. Right now Information overload even mentions information explosion as one of its alt names in the lead. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)