This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
so who is this? Casimir II or Casimir III? Any time kings have multiple numbers (James the Sixth the First springs to mind) those numbers should be explained immediately! AND this is linked off the Rulers of Poland entry as Casimir III!!!!! -- MichaelTinkler 15:15, December 5, 2001
He's refered in Polish almost only as 'Casmir the Great', without any numbers. -- Taw 15:21, December 5, 2001
well, from the current list I can see that he's either #2 or #3, since the list has #1 and #4. -- MichaelTinkler 15:24, December 5, 2001
Family trees are not useful entries. If Casimir (and please don't get me started on people not figuring out nomenclature BEFORE starting an entry) the whichever was great, then there should be something about why, shouldn't there? This is, like so many other entries, not contibutory to history, biography, or even prosopography...just a bunch of facts JHK 15:29, December 5, 2001
Where there are articles about this individual, here is how he is listed in English-language encyclopedias and dictionaries. If you have access to a reference work that is not listed here, please feel free to add to the data. -- Elonka 02:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
It appears that there was never consensus to move this page to Kazimierz II the Just, and it should be moved back to its English name of Casimir II of Poland. Is there support for this move? -- Elonka 02:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Wouldn't 'Casimir II the Just of Poland' or just 'Casimir II the Just' be better?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 23:39, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Failed for WPPOLAND due to insufficient density of inline citations. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:30, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Casimir II the Just. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Augustus II the Strong which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 14:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
so who is this? Casimir II or Casimir III? Any time kings have multiple numbers (James the Sixth the First springs to mind) those numbers should be explained immediately! AND this is linked off the Rulers of Poland entry as Casimir III!!!!! -- MichaelTinkler 15:15, December 5, 2001
He's refered in Polish almost only as 'Casmir the Great', without any numbers. -- Taw 15:21, December 5, 2001
well, from the current list I can see that he's either #2 or #3, since the list has #1 and #4. -- MichaelTinkler 15:24, December 5, 2001
Family trees are not useful entries. If Casimir (and please don't get me started on people not figuring out nomenclature BEFORE starting an entry) the whichever was great, then there should be something about why, shouldn't there? This is, like so many other entries, not contibutory to history, biography, or even prosopography...just a bunch of facts JHK 15:29, December 5, 2001
Where there are articles about this individual, here is how he is listed in English-language encyclopedias and dictionaries. If you have access to a reference work that is not listed here, please feel free to add to the data. -- Elonka 02:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
It appears that there was never consensus to move this page to Kazimierz II the Just, and it should be moved back to its English name of Casimir II of Poland. Is there support for this move? -- Elonka 02:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Wouldn't 'Casimir II the Just of Poland' or just 'Casimir II the Just' be better?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 23:39, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Failed for WPPOLAND due to insufficient density of inline citations. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:30, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Casimir II the Just. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Augustus II the Strong which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 14:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)