This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
10 złotych note was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
The image File:10zl a.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:27, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
... the article says "In 1950, new notes, which were dated 1948, were introduced for 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 and 500 złotych, but 1000 złotych notes were added in 1962.[2] 200 and 2000 złotych notes were added in 1976 and 1977, followed by 5000 złotych notes in 1982" and it has a picture of the ten zloty note with Jozef Bem on it (that should be added and linked). But I'm pretty sure the Bem note was issued in the 1980's (probably 1982), not in 1950 as the article suggests.
More generally, I'm not so sure that this [1] is a reliable source. Volunteer Marek ( talk) 19:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
In fact, it's just an older version of Wikipedia. Volunteer Marek ( talk) 19:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
But, instead of obliging another editor into doing it, you could have been WP:BOLD and fixed it, but with civility of course. – Plarem ( User talk contribs) 18:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Czarkoff ( talk · contribs) 12:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
This section is supposed to be edited only by reviewer(s).
The only (minor) issue I see with this article is the Infobox: it shouldn't have blanks. Either fill in the Designer and Design date fields or remove the pipe symbols (|) from the code. Otherwise good work! — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk) 12:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, just noticed that in the article's body You spell the captions from the notes in ALL CAPS, while on the notes they are spelled in Small Caps. I think that should be fixed. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk) 12:54, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello Dmitrij D. Czarkoff!
The first point has its own issues, unfortunately.
I am onto the the second point. – Plarem ( User talk contribs) 19:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
I also noticed that this must be a rushed review, as after most of my reviews, I get a bowl of strawberries, or a barnstar for my good work. Now I got nothing. :( – Plarem ( User talk contribs) 18:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
It's been two days and the copyvio issues have not been addressed. I've removed the offending section. The article should be delisted from GA. VolunteerMarek 18:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Failed, due to issues raised in the GA review which ended in total removal of several sections (design, security). Without them, the article cannot even claim to be roughly comprehensive. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 22:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
TheCurrencyGuy believes that we should spell złoty as "zloty" and create an unnatural plural "zlotys". I disagree, just as I would if we still had Italian Lire (not Liras!). The wp:common name is złotych. Until the RtM at Polish złoty#Requested move 10 September 2022 is resolved, it is wp:disruptive to try to sneak the equivalent change through on related articles. Please stop. John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 19:52, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
10 złotych note was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
The image File:10zl a.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:27, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
... the article says "In 1950, new notes, which were dated 1948, were introduced for 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 and 500 złotych, but 1000 złotych notes were added in 1962.[2] 200 and 2000 złotych notes were added in 1976 and 1977, followed by 5000 złotych notes in 1982" and it has a picture of the ten zloty note with Jozef Bem on it (that should be added and linked). But I'm pretty sure the Bem note was issued in the 1980's (probably 1982), not in 1950 as the article suggests.
More generally, I'm not so sure that this [1] is a reliable source. Volunteer Marek ( talk) 19:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
In fact, it's just an older version of Wikipedia. Volunteer Marek ( talk) 19:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
But, instead of obliging another editor into doing it, you could have been WP:BOLD and fixed it, but with civility of course. – Plarem ( User talk contribs) 18:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Czarkoff ( talk · contribs) 12:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
This section is supposed to be edited only by reviewer(s).
The only (minor) issue I see with this article is the Infobox: it shouldn't have blanks. Either fill in the Designer and Design date fields or remove the pipe symbols (|) from the code. Otherwise good work! — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk) 12:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, just noticed that in the article's body You spell the captions from the notes in ALL CAPS, while on the notes they are spelled in Small Caps. I think that should be fixed. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk) 12:54, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello Dmitrij D. Czarkoff!
The first point has its own issues, unfortunately.
I am onto the the second point. – Plarem ( User talk contribs) 19:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
I also noticed that this must be a rushed review, as after most of my reviews, I get a bowl of strawberries, or a barnstar for my good work. Now I got nothing. :( – Plarem ( User talk contribs) 18:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
It's been two days and the copyvio issues have not been addressed. I've removed the offending section. The article should be delisted from GA. VolunteerMarek 18:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Failed, due to issues raised in the GA review which ended in total removal of several sections (design, security). Without them, the article cannot even claim to be roughly comprehensive. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 22:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
TheCurrencyGuy believes that we should spell złoty as "zloty" and create an unnatural plural "zlotys". I disagree, just as I would if we still had Italian Lire (not Liras!). The wp:common name is złotych. Until the RtM at Polish złoty#Requested move 10 September 2022 is resolved, it is wp:disruptive to try to sneak the equivalent change through on related articles. Please stop. John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 19:52, 17 September 2022 (UTC)