Łódź insurrection has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why are Lodz insurrection and Lodz Insurrection redlinks? Gene Nygaard 06:09, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Lead mentions it was the largest disturbance, aftermath section mentions it was one of the largest. Background section needs more info about the start of the Russian Revolution - failure in Russo-Japanese war needs to be mentioned in addition to the massacre of 22 January. -- Doopdoop ( talk) 21:32, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Some more remaining issues. Consider mentioning worsening economic conditions before the insurrection. Casualties of May 1st 1905 demonstration in Łódź might also deserve a mention. Ethnic composition of insurrection casualties is also a relevant detail (Według raportów naczelnika żandarmerii powiatu łódzkiego zabito 151 cywilów - 55 Polaków, 79 Żydów i 17 Niemców ). Russian Duma was established after the events described in the article, yet it is mentioned in the background section. Abbreviation PPS is not defined.
Aftermath section - consider moving Ostrowiec Republic sentence to the revolution in the Kingdom of Poland (1905-1907) article. May demonstration in Warsaw probably refers to the 1905, but is presented in the aftermath (should be in the background). Not really sure, but the establishment of Duma, boycott of the elections by PPS might be mentioned in the Aftermath section.
Wikipedia:MOSDEF requires an explanation of word "Duma". "Revolution of 1905 in Polish paintings" picture gallery probably belongs to the revolution in the Kingdom of Poland (1905-1907) article. If you leave these paintings here, please add English translations of picture names and for Masłowski painting provide a short description of what is depicted. -- Doopdoop ( talk) 21:45, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
I would like to get your comment about those issues that you haven't adressed. I believe Duma was established in late 1905, so according to chronological order it should not be mentioned in the background section. What is your opinion about mentioning ethnic composition of insurgents? Could you check the date of the May demonstrations in Warsaw that are mentioned in the aftermath section (if it is 1905 it should go into background section, not into aftermath). -- Doopdoop ( talk) 22:13, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted, as it meets all good article criteria. -- Doopdoop ( talk) 21:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Łódź insurrection (1905)/1.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:22, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
This seems to me irreleant - moved from article to here for discussion. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:56, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ajh1492 ( talk) 16:44, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs some work before it becomes a Good Article.
COMMENTS
So far I have the following comments.
Ajh1492 (
talk) 21:52, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
References
Łódź insurrection has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why are Lodz insurrection and Lodz Insurrection redlinks? Gene Nygaard 06:09, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Lead mentions it was the largest disturbance, aftermath section mentions it was one of the largest. Background section needs more info about the start of the Russian Revolution - failure in Russo-Japanese war needs to be mentioned in addition to the massacre of 22 January. -- Doopdoop ( talk) 21:32, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Some more remaining issues. Consider mentioning worsening economic conditions before the insurrection. Casualties of May 1st 1905 demonstration in Łódź might also deserve a mention. Ethnic composition of insurrection casualties is also a relevant detail (Według raportów naczelnika żandarmerii powiatu łódzkiego zabito 151 cywilów - 55 Polaków, 79 Żydów i 17 Niemców ). Russian Duma was established after the events described in the article, yet it is mentioned in the background section. Abbreviation PPS is not defined.
Aftermath section - consider moving Ostrowiec Republic sentence to the revolution in the Kingdom of Poland (1905-1907) article. May demonstration in Warsaw probably refers to the 1905, but is presented in the aftermath (should be in the background). Not really sure, but the establishment of Duma, boycott of the elections by PPS might be mentioned in the Aftermath section.
Wikipedia:MOSDEF requires an explanation of word "Duma". "Revolution of 1905 in Polish paintings" picture gallery probably belongs to the revolution in the Kingdom of Poland (1905-1907) article. If you leave these paintings here, please add English translations of picture names and for Masłowski painting provide a short description of what is depicted. -- Doopdoop ( talk) 21:45, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
I would like to get your comment about those issues that you haven't adressed. I believe Duma was established in late 1905, so according to chronological order it should not be mentioned in the background section. What is your opinion about mentioning ethnic composition of insurgents? Could you check the date of the May demonstrations in Warsaw that are mentioned in the aftermath section (if it is 1905 it should go into background section, not into aftermath). -- Doopdoop ( talk) 22:13, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted, as it meets all good article criteria. -- Doopdoop ( talk) 21:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Łódź insurrection (1905)/1.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:22, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
This seems to me irreleant - moved from article to here for discussion. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:56, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ajh1492 ( talk) 16:44, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs some work before it becomes a Good Article.
COMMENTS
So far I have the following comments.
Ajh1492 (
talk) 21:52, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
References