![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I think that a "Gold Rush" disambiguation page should be created, as I suspect that many users of the Wikipedia search "Gold Rush" looking for the "Klondike Gold Rush." Anybody else agree? (Yes, I know that there is a link for the Klondike Gold Rush page at the bottom of the article.)-- 66.188.221.60 03:10, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
An unregistered editor, rather than deleting or changing disputed content, simply put a strikethrough through it. This violates WP:MOS. Looking at the paragraph, which is uncited, I chose to remove it completely and place it here pending citation and correction (if the struckthrough material was incorrect). 23skidoo 13:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Using data from the United States Treasury, the stated $4,250,001 pulled in by "The Gold Rush" would be worth about $48,000,000 in 2006 dollars. Please confirm and add as necessary.
i what bto know about the gold rush and how it got started —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.229.193.11 ( talk) 21:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
The image Image:LadyBouviersLover1.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 07:56, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
The infobox says the film grossed $499,000 (less than it cost) but the article says it grossed $4.25 million and was the highest grossing silent film of all time! Which is it? Gatoclass ( talk) 15:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
I am setting up another editathon in the UK at the Cinema Museum in London with a Chaplin focus. The Assocation Chalin are being very helpful in terms of allowing photography of artifacts etc.
One area they are asking for help on page improvement is around this section.
They believe it is inaccurate and would like to replace some of the current text thus:
“In 1953, the original 1925 film possibly entered the public domain in the USA, as Chaplin did not renew its copyright registration in the 28th year after publication in accordance to American law of the time.[7] As such, the film was once widely available on home video in that country. In the years since, Chaplin's estate has blocked the unauthorized releases of The Gold Rush in the United States:
by arguing that under URAA/GATT, the copyright to the dramatic composition of The Gold Rush was restored, and therefore US copyright in the 1925 version was also restored.”
This would therefore be deleted: “However, according to copyrightdata.com, the film was first screened in the USA, thereby disqualifying reciprocal copyright recognition under §104A(h)(6)(D); and the film exceeded the 30-day rule (more than 30 days between the US and British screenings), thus also disqualifying it for reciprocal-nation copyright protection.[8] »
Anyone feel this is not valid?
YellowFratello ( talk) 16:33, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
No comments so will make the change. YellowFratello ( talk) 17:53, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
As requested by Kailash29792, I have copy-edited this article. I have added a few "citation needed" tags, cleaned up some of the citations, and changed the article's structure a bit, along with the usual copy editing.
Feel free to correct any remaining errors that I have left behind. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 04:52, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I think that a "Gold Rush" disambiguation page should be created, as I suspect that many users of the Wikipedia search "Gold Rush" looking for the "Klondike Gold Rush." Anybody else agree? (Yes, I know that there is a link for the Klondike Gold Rush page at the bottom of the article.)-- 66.188.221.60 03:10, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
An unregistered editor, rather than deleting or changing disputed content, simply put a strikethrough through it. This violates WP:MOS. Looking at the paragraph, which is uncited, I chose to remove it completely and place it here pending citation and correction (if the struckthrough material was incorrect). 23skidoo 13:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Using data from the United States Treasury, the stated $4,250,001 pulled in by "The Gold Rush" would be worth about $48,000,000 in 2006 dollars. Please confirm and add as necessary.
i what bto know about the gold rush and how it got started —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.229.193.11 ( talk) 21:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
The image Image:LadyBouviersLover1.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 07:56, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
The infobox says the film grossed $499,000 (less than it cost) but the article says it grossed $4.25 million and was the highest grossing silent film of all time! Which is it? Gatoclass ( talk) 15:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
I am setting up another editathon in the UK at the Cinema Museum in London with a Chaplin focus. The Assocation Chalin are being very helpful in terms of allowing photography of artifacts etc.
One area they are asking for help on page improvement is around this section.
They believe it is inaccurate and would like to replace some of the current text thus:
“In 1953, the original 1925 film possibly entered the public domain in the USA, as Chaplin did not renew its copyright registration in the 28th year after publication in accordance to American law of the time.[7] As such, the film was once widely available on home video in that country. In the years since, Chaplin's estate has blocked the unauthorized releases of The Gold Rush in the United States:
by arguing that under URAA/GATT, the copyright to the dramatic composition of The Gold Rush was restored, and therefore US copyright in the 1925 version was also restored.”
This would therefore be deleted: “However, according to copyrightdata.com, the film was first screened in the USA, thereby disqualifying reciprocal copyright recognition under §104A(h)(6)(D); and the film exceeded the 30-day rule (more than 30 days between the US and British screenings), thus also disqualifying it for reciprocal-nation copyright protection.[8] »
Anyone feel this is not valid?
YellowFratello ( talk) 16:33, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
No comments so will make the change. YellowFratello ( talk) 17:53, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
As requested by Kailash29792, I have copy-edited this article. I have added a few "citation needed" tags, cleaned up some of the citations, and changed the article's structure a bit, along with the usual copy editing.
Feel free to correct any remaining errors that I have left behind. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 04:52, 21 January 2015 (UTC)