Comedy articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	???	Total
FA	2	9	20	65		2	98
FL		1	37	30		1	69
GA	7	45	84	594		65	795
B	28	90	184	277		65	644
C	34	120	359	1,291		478	2,282
Start	14	96	370	4,027	2	2,048	6,557
Stub	1	10	65	1,375		1,304	2,755
List	3	12	142	426	10	208	801
Category				3	4,319		4,322
File				21	172		193
Portal					3		3
Project				2	21		23
Template	1	1	5	4	256		267
NA		7	26	268	1,485		1,786
Other			2	16	158		176
Assessed	90	391	1,294	8,399	6,426	4,171	20,771
Unassessed		1	1	5		331	338
Total	90	392	1,295	8,404	6,426	4,502	21,109
WikiWork factors ( ?)		ω = 61,950			Ω = 4.72

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Comedy! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Comedy related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{ WikiProject Comedy}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Comedy articles by quality and Category:Comedy articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

How can I get my article rated?

Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.

Who can assess articles?

Any member of the Comedy WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.

Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?

Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

What if I don't agree with a rating?

You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.

Aren't the ratings subjective?

Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Quality assessment

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{ WikiProject Comedy}} project banner on its talk page:

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Comedy articles)		FA
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Comedy articles)		A
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Comedy articles)		GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Comedy articles)		B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Comedy articles)		C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Comedy articles)		Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Comedy articles)		Stub
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Comedy articles)		FL
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Comedy articles)		List

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

Quality scale

The scale for assessments is defined at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment. Articles are divided into the following categories.

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
FA	The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. under discussion	The Simpsons
FL	The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. (c) Accessibility. It uses proper formating to be accessible to all readers. Bulleted and unbulleted lists and tables are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize alternative (alt) text. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available.	List of 30 Rock episodes
A	The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help.	N/A
GA	The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria A good article is: Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	Calvin and Hobbes
B	The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{ cite web}} is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be " brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.	2010 Tonight Show conflict
C	The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems.	Blackadder
Start	An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following: A useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.	Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.	2DTV
Stub	A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.	Comedy Death-Ray
List	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	List of Frasier episodes
Category	Any category falls under this class.	Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area.	Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized.	Category:Comedy
File	Any page in the file namespace falls under this class.	The page contains an image, a sound clip or other media-related content.	Make sure that the file is properly licensed and credited.	File:SMirC-laugh.svg
Portal	Any page in the portal namespace falls under this class.	Portals are intended to serve as "main pages" for specific topics.	Editor involvement is essential to ensure that portals are kept up to date.	Portal:Comedy
Project	All WikiProject-related pages fall under this class.	Project pages are intended to aid editors in article development.	Develop these pages into collaborative resources that are useful for improving articles within the project.	Wikipedia:WikiProject Comedy
Template	Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes.	Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles.	Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information.	Template:Infobox comedian
NA	Any non-article page that fits no other classification.	The page contains no article content.	Look out for misclassified articles. Currently, many NA-class articles may need to be re-classified.	N/A

Importance assessment

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{ WikiProject Comedy}} project banner on its talk page:

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

Importance scale

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Comedy.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. Please note that an importance rating may not be given in some cases if the reviewer is unfamiliar with the subject.

If you assess an article, please strike it off using <s>Strike-through text</s> so that other editors will not waste time going there too. Thanks!

Submit new requests here:

1. Mike Nichols- partially expanded and rewritten.-- 206.188.55.235 ( talk) 21:33, 19 October 2011 (UTC) reply
2. Mel Brooks - partially expanded and rewritten.-- 66.212.78.220 ( talk) 21:12, 21 October 2011 (UTC) reply
3. Georges Méliès - needs assessment.-- 206.188.36.84 ( talk) 21:42, 18 December 2011 (UTC) reply
4. Stanley Donen - needs assessment.-- 206.188.36.84 ( talk) 21:42, 18 December 2011 (UTC) reply
5. Paul F. Tompkins - expanded and re-written. -- Marchije• ^speak/ _peek 22:52, 1 June 2012 (UTC) reply
6. Comedy Bang Bang (TV series) - New article. Ænea ♫ ^♪ 16:09, 18 June 2012 (UTC) reply
7. Coach Ernie Pantusso Nick1372 ( talk) 00:03, 25 May 2013 (UTC) reply
8. Kitty Flanagan- substantially expanded and verifiable references added. KittyLover ( talk) 03:57, 7 August 2015 (UTC) reply
9. Phyllis Diller - expanded, reorganized, citations and importance as groundbreaking comic added. -- Utilizer ( talk) 19:59, 4 November 2015 (UTC) reply
10. Lenny Schultz - requesting assessment.-- Deoliveirafan ( talk) 00:57, 8 March 2016 (UTC) reply
11. The Jeffersons - Article is rated as high importance for this project. I spent the last couple of days finding and adding a ton of references and doing some other cleanup. Should be above start class now. Funcrunch ( talk) 21:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC) reply
12. Artie Lange — Needs reassessment. Thank you! LowSelfEstidle ( talk) 08:49, 13 May 2017 (UTC) reply
13. The Firesign Theatre — Needs reassessment. Vastly expanded and improved by User:JustinTime55. Needs a look. Thank you!
14. Armpit fart - Elaborated a little bit -- D0nk m3m3s ( talk) 14:32, 24 February 2020 (UTC) reply
15. Comedy music - Significantly expanded and is currently needing reassessment. Thank you. AnggotheManggo ( talk) 03:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC) reply
16. Puppetry of the Penis - Hello! I have improved this article by adding over 2000 words, media, an infobox and references for my university assignment. It would be very helpful if this article could be re-assessed, as I believe it is now above Start-Class status. There is also a banner at the top of the article from 2012 requesting a need for additional citations, and I was hoping this could be reviewed. I have since added over 30 new references to the article to improve verifiability and credibility. Thank you very much. Rubyredgirl ( talk) 07:18, 11 June 2021 (UTC) reply
17. # Tommy Trinder expanded and rewritten. Humbledaisy ( talk) 19:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC). reply

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

April 27, 2024

Reassessed

• Gaza's sky is black but Qatar is always sunny ( talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. ( rev · t)
• No Pants Day ( talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. ( rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. ( rev · t)
• Taylor Tomlinson ( talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Mid-Class. ( rev · t)
• The Bounder ( talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. ( rev · t)

Assessed

• Draft:Dracula, A Comedy of Terrors ( talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Draft:Eric Notarnicola ( talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Nick White (comedian) ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. ( rev · t)
• Platilda Dias ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. ( rev · t)
• Syed Rahman Shino ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. ( rev · t)
• The Second Best Hospital in the Galaxy ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. ( rev · t)

April 26, 2024

Renamed

• John D'Silva renamed to John D' Silva.
• Son in Law renamed to Affinity (law).
• Turbo (film) renamed to Turbo (disambiguation).
• Would I Lie to You? (game show) renamed to Would I Lie to You?.

Reassessed

• Category:20th-century Argentine comedians ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:21st-century Argentine comedians ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Adult Swim animated television series ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Argentine comedians by century ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Chop Socky Boom ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. ( rev · t)
• Clueless ( talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from London by borough ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the City of Westminster ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Barnet ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Bexley ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Brent ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Bromley ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Camden ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Croydon ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Ealing ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Enfield ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Hackney ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Haringey ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Harrow ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Havering ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Hillingdon ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Hounslow ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Islington ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Lambeth ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Lewisham ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Merton ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Newham ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Redbridge ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Southwark ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Sutton ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Tower Hamlets ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Waltham Forest ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Wandsworth ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Shayne Smith (comedian) ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as Low-Class. ( rev · t)
• Turbo (2013 film) ( talk) reassessed. Importance assessed as Low-Class. ( rev · t)

Assessed

• Category:Black comedy web series ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Coyle and Sharpe ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. ( rev · t)
• John D' Silva ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. ( rev · t)
• Draft:Lucy Heavens ( talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Draft:Neema Naz ( talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Draft:Nic Smal ( talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Draft:Royal Pear ( talk) assessed. Importance assessed as Low-Class. ( rev · t)
• Slay (film) ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. ( rev · t)
• Son in Law (film) ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. ( rev · t)
• Draft:St. Skeletor's Day ( talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• The Jerma985 Dollhouse ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. ( rev · t)
• Would I Lie to You? (British game show) ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. ( rev · t)

Removed

• Draft:Steve Girard ( talk) removed.

April 25, 2024

Assessed

• Category:20th-century Argentine comedians ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:21st-century Argentine comedians ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Adult Swim animated television series ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Argentine comedians by century ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Chop Socky Boom ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from London by borough ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the City of Westminster ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Barnet ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Bexley ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Brent ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Bromley ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Camden ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Croydon ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Ealing ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Enfield ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Hackney ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Haringey ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Harrow ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Havering ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Hillingdon ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Hounslow ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Islington ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Lambeth ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Lewisham ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Merton ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Newham ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Redbridge ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Southwark ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Sutton ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Tower Hamlets ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Waltham Forest ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the London Borough of Wandsworth ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t)
• Shayne Smith (comedian) ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. ( rev · t)
• Turbo (2013 film) ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)

April 24, 2024

Renamed

• Forky renamed to List of Toy Story characters.
• Mr. Pricklepants renamed to List of Toy Story characters.

Assessed

• Category:Argentine LGBT comedians ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Argentine comedy television series by decade ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Brazilian crime comedy films ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Hungarian sports comedy films ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Inga Naan Thaan Kingu ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Lists of Canadian comedy-drama television series episodes ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)

Removed

• Draft:Office Hours Sketch Comedy ( talk) removed.

April 23, 2024

Renamed

• H. Vernon Watson renamed to Vernon Watson.
• Mask and Wig renamed to Mask and Wig Club.
• Draft:Sion Owens renamed to Draft:Siôn Owens.

Assessed

• Category:1930s political satire films ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:1933 black comedy films ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:1937 black comedy films ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:British superhero comedy films ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Aberdeen ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Calgary ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Cambridge, Massachusetts ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Columbus, Ohio ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Dallas ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Edmonton ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Evanston, Illinois ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Madison, Wisconsin ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Memphis, Tennessee ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Milwaukee ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Minneapolis ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Nashville, Tennessee ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Newark, New Jersey ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Oklahoma City ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Orlando, Florida ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Phoenix, Arizona ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Sacramento, California ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Saint Paul, Minnesota ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from San Antonio ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Savannah, Georgia ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Toledo, Ohio ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Trenton, New Jersey ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Tulsa, Oklahoma ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from Winnipeg ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the Royal Borough of Greenwich ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Comedians from the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Irish comedy short films ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Luva de Pedreiro ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. ( rev · t)
• Mask and Wig Club ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Mexican stand-up comedians ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Multi-camera television sitcoms ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Namibian comedy films ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Sculptures based on the Divine Comedy ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Draft:Siôn Owens ( talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Song Xiaobao ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Surinamese comedians ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Vernon Watson ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Vietnamese comedians ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Draft:Will Franken ( talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)

Removed

• Draft:Michael Conley ( talk) removed.

April 22, 2024

Assessed

• The Loud House (franchise) ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. ( rev · t)

April 21, 2024

Renamed

• Road Trip (film) renamed to Road Trip.

Reassessed

• Odd Couple (song) ( talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. ( rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. ( rev · t)
• Something Wild (1986 film) ( talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. ( rev · t)

Assessed

• A Missed Fortune ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. ( rev · t)
• Draft:Aidan Cutler ( talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Bourgeois & Maurice ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. ( rev · t)
• Bring the Funny ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. ( rev · t)
• Gaza's sky is black but Qatar is always sunny ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. ( rev · t)
• Half-Wits Holiday ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. ( rev · t)
• Joe Besser ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. ( rev · t)
• Kook's Tour ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. ( rev · t)
• No Census, No Feeling ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. ( rev · t)
• Road Trip (2000 film) ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. ( rev · t)
• Category:Stanisław Lem characters ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. ( rev · t)
• Three Arabian Nuts ( talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. ( rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. ( rev · t)

Removed

• Category:Stanisław Lem fictional characters ( talk) removed.