![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Soviet Union might have cautioned Poland against attacking Czechoslovakia. Nevertheless, afterwards the pact was renewed on November 26, 1938. (see [1], [2] etc). Let me quote:
November 26, 1938 Poland and Russia Renew Non-Aggression Pact The Polish government, exposed to German eastward expansion, sought closer relations with the Soviet Union by renewing the Soviet-Polish Non-Aggression Pact. The Polish government made efforts to build up a barrier of Baltic and Balkan states to help maintain the status quo in Eastern Europe. Balcer 14:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
I will not revert right away because that would break the 3RR rule. I am saddened to see that except for me and Halibutt no other editors have cared to provide any references. My searches on the web regarding the supposed breaking of the pact by the Soviet Union in 1938 have yielded little. From this it certainly appears that it was not a very notable event, if it ever happened.
Well Ghirlandajo you are always welcomed to prove your theories-such as the one that Katyn was a CIA plot...You are welcomed to it. -- Molobo 07:50, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Furthermore, it appears that some editors' sole purpose is to play up the "Polish invasion of Czechoslovakia". Fortunately, there was no such thing in 1938. A search of books on Google Print yields precisely zero hits for that term (see [3]) Balcer 23:38, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Ghirlandajo believes Katyn is a CIA plot and uses Soviet encyclopedia as reference-his sources seem to be questionable. -- Molobo 09:28, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Its nothing new-everybody knows Poland moved into territories Czechs took during Polish-Bolshevik war to protect Poles from German control. -- Molobo 07:43, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
I removed unsourced allegations. I suggest giving a quote or online sources confirming allegations that Soviets denounced the Pact after Poland took back territories annexed by Czechoslovakia during Bolshevik invasion of Poland. -- Molobo 07:47, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
I see that Ghirlandajo added the total dispute tag, which means that he disputes both the neutrality and factual accuracy of the entire article. Are there any specific concerns he has or is every single word wrong here? Halibu tt 11:16, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Does this mean Poland was much weakened, or Polish diplomacy was? Was it weakened by the toll war, and the renouncement (whose?), and the loosened links? What kind of links—diplomatic, economic?
How about this: "At the time, the non-aggression pact was considered a major diplomatic success for Poland, which had been weakened by the Toll War with Germany, by Germany's renouncement of part of the Treaty of Versailles, and by the loosening of diplomatic ties with France"? Be patient with me; I don't know the history, just trying to tighten up the wording. — Michael Z. 2006-02-03 17:43 Z
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Soviet Union might have cautioned Poland against attacking Czechoslovakia. Nevertheless, afterwards the pact was renewed on November 26, 1938. (see [1], [2] etc). Let me quote:
November 26, 1938 Poland and Russia Renew Non-Aggression Pact The Polish government, exposed to German eastward expansion, sought closer relations with the Soviet Union by renewing the Soviet-Polish Non-Aggression Pact. The Polish government made efforts to build up a barrier of Baltic and Balkan states to help maintain the status quo in Eastern Europe. Balcer 14:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
I will not revert right away because that would break the 3RR rule. I am saddened to see that except for me and Halibutt no other editors have cared to provide any references. My searches on the web regarding the supposed breaking of the pact by the Soviet Union in 1938 have yielded little. From this it certainly appears that it was not a very notable event, if it ever happened.
Well Ghirlandajo you are always welcomed to prove your theories-such as the one that Katyn was a CIA plot...You are welcomed to it. -- Molobo 07:50, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Furthermore, it appears that some editors' sole purpose is to play up the "Polish invasion of Czechoslovakia". Fortunately, there was no such thing in 1938. A search of books on Google Print yields precisely zero hits for that term (see [3]) Balcer 23:38, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Ghirlandajo believes Katyn is a CIA plot and uses Soviet encyclopedia as reference-his sources seem to be questionable. -- Molobo 09:28, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Its nothing new-everybody knows Poland moved into territories Czechs took during Polish-Bolshevik war to protect Poles from German control. -- Molobo 07:43, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
I removed unsourced allegations. I suggest giving a quote or online sources confirming allegations that Soviets denounced the Pact after Poland took back territories annexed by Czechoslovakia during Bolshevik invasion of Poland. -- Molobo 07:47, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
I see that Ghirlandajo added the total dispute tag, which means that he disputes both the neutrality and factual accuracy of the entire article. Are there any specific concerns he has or is every single word wrong here? Halibu tt 11:16, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Does this mean Poland was much weakened, or Polish diplomacy was? Was it weakened by the toll war, and the renouncement (whose?), and the loosened links? What kind of links—diplomatic, economic?
How about this: "At the time, the non-aggression pact was considered a major diplomatic success for Poland, which had been weakened by the Toll War with Germany, by Germany's renouncement of part of the Treaty of Versailles, and by the loosening of diplomatic ties with France"? Be patient with me; I don't know the history, just trying to tighten up the wording. — Michael Z. 2006-02-03 17:43 Z