![]() | Sejm of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article meets the B-class criteria. A candidate for good article I think. Confirmed for WP:POLAND by Orczar ( talk) 15:22, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Unreferenced para moved from talk. Feel free to restore with references, and when it is reworded to sound less like trivia. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 04:14, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Interestingly, the expression ' Polish parliament' (in Swedish: Polsk riksdag) occurs in modern Swedish and Norwegian to denote organizational anarchy and disorder. This is suggested to have originated from comparisons to the veto right in the Polish Sejm during Commonwealth times, which was likely an unthinkable liberty in the authoritarian systems of neighbouring countries, including the Swedish Absolute Monarchy.
The name of a specific sejm, e.g. the "Great Sejm", is naturally capitalized. Other than that, "the sejm" and "the senate", in the sense of a general institution, should be either consistently capitalized or not, at least within the same article, I think. Since "sejm" is not capitalized in the article's name (title), I changed it (and the senate) to the lower case throughout the article. Orczar ( talk) 06:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk · contribs) 17:56, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
I've completed a quick scan-read of the article, but I've not checked any of the references or citations, and it appears to be at or about GA-level (however, the Lead seems a bit "short), so I'll carry out a more detailed review.
I'm going to leave the WP:Lead until last, and start at the Etymology section, work my way to the end and then do the Lead. Please note: this part is most about clarifying parts that need clarifying, so I'll mostly be discussing "problems" here. Pyrotec ( talk) 13:32, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
... stopping for now. To be continued. Pyrotec ( talk) 21:30, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
At this stage, I'm going to put the review On Hold. I would expect that this article will soon be a GA, but I'd like the points above to be resolved first.
Pyrotec (
talk) 22:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A interesting and "easy to review" article on a topic that I'd not met before.
I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on producing an informative, well referenced and well-illustrated article on this topic. Pyrotec ( talk) 20:29, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Piotr, before you start reverting Glovacki's changes -- I like them and I think they should be improved upon. I think it standardizes article titles well and creates a series of articles with clear chronological limits. I might even do some work on this. Renata ( talk) 17:51, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() | Sejm of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article meets the B-class criteria. A candidate for good article I think. Confirmed for WP:POLAND by Orczar ( talk) 15:22, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Unreferenced para moved from talk. Feel free to restore with references, and when it is reworded to sound less like trivia. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 04:14, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Interestingly, the expression ' Polish parliament' (in Swedish: Polsk riksdag) occurs in modern Swedish and Norwegian to denote organizational anarchy and disorder. This is suggested to have originated from comparisons to the veto right in the Polish Sejm during Commonwealth times, which was likely an unthinkable liberty in the authoritarian systems of neighbouring countries, including the Swedish Absolute Monarchy.
The name of a specific sejm, e.g. the "Great Sejm", is naturally capitalized. Other than that, "the sejm" and "the senate", in the sense of a general institution, should be either consistently capitalized or not, at least within the same article, I think. Since "sejm" is not capitalized in the article's name (title), I changed it (and the senate) to the lower case throughout the article. Orczar ( talk) 06:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk · contribs) 17:56, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
I've completed a quick scan-read of the article, but I've not checked any of the references or citations, and it appears to be at or about GA-level (however, the Lead seems a bit "short), so I'll carry out a more detailed review.
I'm going to leave the WP:Lead until last, and start at the Etymology section, work my way to the end and then do the Lead. Please note: this part is most about clarifying parts that need clarifying, so I'll mostly be discussing "problems" here. Pyrotec ( talk) 13:32, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
... stopping for now. To be continued. Pyrotec ( talk) 21:30, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
At this stage, I'm going to put the review On Hold. I would expect that this article will soon be a GA, but I'd like the points above to be resolved first.
Pyrotec (
talk) 22:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A interesting and "easy to review" article on a topic that I'd not met before.
I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on producing an informative, well referenced and well-illustrated article on this topic. Pyrotec ( talk) 20:29, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Piotr, before you start reverting Glovacki's changes -- I like them and I think they should be improved upon. I think it standardizes article titles well and creates a series of articles with clear chronological limits. I might even do some work on this. Renata ( talk) 17:51, 20 December 2015 (UTC)