This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Science fiction film article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 730 days
![]() |
|
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Some parts of the current article may be merged/synchronised with Science fiction on television. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:47, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
If the 1950s is the golden age do science fiction film (and it is) then why doesn't have it's own heading rather than being subsumed with the 1930s and 1940s? 107.221.229.121 ( talk)
The oldest of those movies is 1979; the latest is a franchise that started in 2000. Those hardly count as early films about alien invaders. This is followed by a list of "early films" where aliens are benign or beneficial, which range from 1975 to 2009.
I think there might be something relevant to be said about the history of depictions of alien life in SF film, but as written, the article doesn't even come close.
Also, as with the previous section, this entire section appears to be uncited original research, and largely incorrect. (For example, Avatar isn't about benign aliens any more than Starship Troopers is.) -- 157.131.170.189 ( talk) 00:35, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. It would be best to group together all articles which use "science fiction" as an adjective and nominate it this way, to maintain internal consistency within the group. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:16, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Science fiction film → Science-fiction film – compound modifier UpdateNerd ( talk) 08:13, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Science fiction film article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 730 days
![]() |
|
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Some parts of the current article may be merged/synchronised with Science fiction on television. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:47, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
If the 1950s is the golden age do science fiction film (and it is) then why doesn't have it's own heading rather than being subsumed with the 1930s and 1940s? 107.221.229.121 ( talk)
The oldest of those movies is 1979; the latest is a franchise that started in 2000. Those hardly count as early films about alien invaders. This is followed by a list of "early films" where aliens are benign or beneficial, which range from 1975 to 2009.
I think there might be something relevant to be said about the history of depictions of alien life in SF film, but as written, the article doesn't even come close.
Also, as with the previous section, this entire section appears to be uncited original research, and largely incorrect. (For example, Avatar isn't about benign aliens any more than Starship Troopers is.) -- 157.131.170.189 ( talk) 00:35, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. It would be best to group together all articles which use "science fiction" as an adjective and nominate it this way, to maintain internal consistency within the group. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:16, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Science fiction film → Science-fiction film – compound modifier UpdateNerd ( talk) 08:13, 23 April 2019 (UTC)