![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 9 January 2020. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
RGraph article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This page was
proposed for deletion by
Piotrus (
talk ·
contribs) on 8 January 2020 with the comment: Some mentions in passing but not seeing any reliable review that's in-depth. Seems to fail WP:NSOFTWARE. It was contested by Avbgok ( talk · contribs) on 2020-01-09 with the comment: deprodded according to wp:deprod |
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
belong in the article? Perhaps discuss here and reach consensus. David notMD ( talk) 11:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
I want to pay attention of other editors that a lot of significant edits including the addition of the code mentioned above have been made lately by user with WP:COI ( acknowledged). At first glance those edits look really promotional adding excessive details. Opinions and efforts on how to best work on this article then are welcomed. Thank you. Avbgok ( talk) 14:00, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
I've made edits and removed what I think is "promotional". Which bits do you question? Is there something else that you want me to do to the article? Revert it to what it was before I started editing it? I do like the box on the right-hand-side though. Plus I don't know what is meant by "needs citation" I've removed a few more bits - does it now fit with Wikipedia standards?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard heyes ( talk • contribs) 20:09, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Why is this article going to be deleted? I've removed anything that could be considered "promotional". Richard heyes ( talk) 23:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
I have deprodded it according to WP:DEPROD as I consider this article passing WP:NSOFT and anyway we should remember about WP:CONTN. Informed Piotrus on their user talk page. Avbgok ( talk) 08:41, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 9 January 2020. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
RGraph article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This page was
proposed for deletion by
Piotrus (
talk ·
contribs) on 8 January 2020 with the comment: Some mentions in passing but not seeing any reliable review that's in-depth. Seems to fail WP:NSOFTWARE. It was contested by Avbgok ( talk · contribs) on 2020-01-09 with the comment: deprodded according to wp:deprod |
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
belong in the article? Perhaps discuss here and reach consensus. David notMD ( talk) 11:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
I want to pay attention of other editors that a lot of significant edits including the addition of the code mentioned above have been made lately by user with WP:COI ( acknowledged). At first glance those edits look really promotional adding excessive details. Opinions and efforts on how to best work on this article then are welcomed. Thank you. Avbgok ( talk) 14:00, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
I've made edits and removed what I think is "promotional". Which bits do you question? Is there something else that you want me to do to the article? Revert it to what it was before I started editing it? I do like the box on the right-hand-side though. Plus I don't know what is meant by "needs citation" I've removed a few more bits - does it now fit with Wikipedia standards?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard heyes ( talk • contribs) 20:09, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Why is this article going to be deleted? I've removed anything that could be considered "promotional". Richard heyes ( talk) 23:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
I have deprodded it according to WP:DEPROD as I consider this article passing WP:NSOFT and anyway we should remember about WP:CONTN. Informed Piotrus on their user talk page. Avbgok ( talk) 08:41, 9 January 2020 (UTC)