This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article was nominated for
deletion on 15 June 2020. The result of
the discussion was merge.
Requested move 22 June 2020
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Support per nom, removes the ambigious nature of the current title. LugnutsFire Walk with Me 12:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support. When I created this, I chose the title according to sources such as
[1] and
[2]. I saw something interesting and wanted to write it up and I was unaware of the sensitivity of the subject matter. I understand now that the media chose hyperbole, that the topic can be contentious because of history, and that "border incident" is better despite sources using other words.--
Chuka Chief (
talk) 14:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support per nomination, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus, GizzyCatBella, Lugnuts and Chuka Chief. —
Roman Spinner(talk •
contribs) 22:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support per
WP:SURPRISE, if someone searches up “Polish invasion of the Czech Republic” the chances of them specifically wanting this article are somewhat low. Proposed change explains the subject far better.
Devonian Wombat (
talk) 22:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support per the above. More neutral title and overall a better fit.--
Darwinek (
talk) 23:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support per above. No need to go into the details, as obvious.
Britishfinance (
talk) 23:36, 23 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Did you know nomination
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Let's wait until the AFD is closed as "keep" or "no consensus", and until the
WP:RM is closed as well, and the article is moved to a different title. Afterwards, the article will have to be copyedited to comply with the new article title. This will have to be reflected in the DYK hook too. This was no "invasion" but a border incident. Overall, this DYK is #toosoon.--
Darwinek (
talk) 23:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Article has been deleted and merged with
Czech Republic–Poland relations. There's a chance it could be proposed as a 5x expansion of that article? The relations article would need some work on structure and referencing first though. Let me know -
Dumelow (
talk) 12:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The relations article would need a considerable amount of work. As it stands now, half of the article is a short description of CZ-PL relations, while the other gives an unnecessary detail on a recent non-notable incident. The article would benefit from much more information on relations and cooperation in the areas like common policies, economic, cultural, sport or military relations, with the emphasis on the collaboration within V4 Group.-
Darwinek (
talk) 23:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The nominated article no longer exists. If CZ-PL is 5x expanded, please nominate it separately.
The Squirrel Conspiracy (
talk) 23:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)reply
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article was nominated for
deletion on 15 June 2020. The result of
the discussion was merge.
Requested move 22 June 2020
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Support per nom, removes the ambigious nature of the current title. LugnutsFire Walk with Me 12:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support. When I created this, I chose the title according to sources such as
[1] and
[2]. I saw something interesting and wanted to write it up and I was unaware of the sensitivity of the subject matter. I understand now that the media chose hyperbole, that the topic can be contentious because of history, and that "border incident" is better despite sources using other words.--
Chuka Chief (
talk) 14:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support per nomination, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus, GizzyCatBella, Lugnuts and Chuka Chief. —
Roman Spinner(talk •
contribs) 22:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support per
WP:SURPRISE, if someone searches up “Polish invasion of the Czech Republic” the chances of them specifically wanting this article are somewhat low. Proposed change explains the subject far better.
Devonian Wombat (
talk) 22:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support per the above. More neutral title and overall a better fit.--
Darwinek (
talk) 23:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support per above. No need to go into the details, as obvious.
Britishfinance (
talk) 23:36, 23 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Did you know nomination
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Let's wait until the AFD is closed as "keep" or "no consensus", and until the
WP:RM is closed as well, and the article is moved to a different title. Afterwards, the article will have to be copyedited to comply with the new article title. This will have to be reflected in the DYK hook too. This was no "invasion" but a border incident. Overall, this DYK is #toosoon.--
Darwinek (
talk) 23:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Article has been deleted and merged with
Czech Republic–Poland relations. There's a chance it could be proposed as a 5x expansion of that article? The relations article would need some work on structure and referencing first though. Let me know -
Dumelow (
talk) 12:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The relations article would need a considerable amount of work. As it stands now, half of the article is a short description of CZ-PL relations, while the other gives an unnecessary detail on a recent non-notable incident. The article would benefit from much more information on relations and cooperation in the areas like common policies, economic, cultural, sport or military relations, with the emphasis on the collaboration within V4 Group.-
Darwinek (
talk) 23:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The nominated article no longer exists. If CZ-PL is 5x expanded, please nominate it separately.
The Squirrel Conspiracy (
talk) 23:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)reply