This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Pikachu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Pikachu" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 60 days
![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add content on concept section that Pikachu doesnt appear anymore in the 2023 new pokemon season. it isnt that OP
2001:4455:688:5F00:E096:7C6F:D50B:3C3C ( talk) 13:19, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
The redirect
P1k@chu has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § P1k@chu until a consensus is reached.
Hey man im josh (
talk)
14:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
let people edit. GRDAS ( talk) 13:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Pokelego999 ( talk · contribs) 23:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Nominator: Pokelego999 ( talk · contribs) 23:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Vibrantzin ( talk · contribs) 02:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I plan on reviewing the 'Pikachu' page for the good article nominations. Good luck!
Signed, Vibrantzin.
Thank you for considering to apply for an application to adjust the Pikachu page onto the good article status. However, I cannot pass it based on some conditions. First, I feel like it often goes too much into detail about some minor details about the topic. Secondly, long periods of text often went by without sources. Finally, some information seems to be irrelevant.
An instance I believe that these issues occur may be found at Pikachu, Cultural impact. Only two mentions were written in this section and has a less variety of information unlike the Critical reception section.
It should not take too long to fix it. I will set the page on hold for a certain amount of time.
Taken directly from the Wikipedia article " Good article criteria".
1. Well-written: As far as I can tell, there are no glaring grammatical mistakes that need to be addressed.
2. Verifiable with no original research: There are no self-studies, as it is practically impossible to do so. All explanations are quoted and/or cited.
3. Broad in its coverage: Some issues need to be addressed in this section. Please see above for comments.
4. Neutral: Some of the topics overlap with topic 3. Please see above.
5. Stable and 6. Illustrated: The article has done exceptional work in these criteria. Great work!
Once again, I will be putting this nomination on hold. This is not a rejection, however, a reviewer can later see if they agree or disagree with my judgment.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Pokelego999 ( talk · contribs) 23:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: David Fuchs ( talk · contribs) 19:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
In progress. Hit me up in a week or so if there's no review posted. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 19:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I think at this point the major issue with the article is meeting criterion 1 and 3, and I think it needs more work than the scope of a GAN, so I'm failing it at present. -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 23:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Pikachu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Pikachu" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 60 days
![]() |
![]() | Pikachu was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add content on concept section that Pikachu doesnt appear anymore in the 2023 new pokemon season. it isnt that OP
2001:4455:688:5F00:E096:7C6F:D50B:3C3C ( talk) 13:19, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
The redirect
P1k@chu has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § P1k@chu until a consensus is reached.
Hey man im josh (
talk)
14:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
let people edit. GRDAS ( talk) 13:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Pokelego999 ( talk · contribs) 23:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Nominator: Pokelego999 ( talk · contribs) 23:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Vibrantzin ( talk · contribs) 02:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I plan on reviewing the 'Pikachu' page for the good article nominations. Good luck!
Signed, Vibrantzin.
Thank you for considering to apply for an application to adjust the Pikachu page onto the good article status. However, I cannot pass it based on some conditions. First, I feel like it often goes too much into detail about some minor details about the topic. Secondly, long periods of text often went by without sources. Finally, some information seems to be irrelevant.
An instance I believe that these issues occur may be found at Pikachu, Cultural impact. Only two mentions were written in this section and has a less variety of information unlike the Critical reception section.
It should not take too long to fix it. I will set the page on hold for a certain amount of time.
Taken directly from the Wikipedia article " Good article criteria".
1. Well-written: As far as I can tell, there are no glaring grammatical mistakes that need to be addressed.
2. Verifiable with no original research: There are no self-studies, as it is practically impossible to do so. All explanations are quoted and/or cited.
3. Broad in its coverage: Some issues need to be addressed in this section. Please see above for comments.
4. Neutral: Some of the topics overlap with topic 3. Please see above.
5. Stable and 6. Illustrated: The article has done exceptional work in these criteria. Great work!
Once again, I will be putting this nomination on hold. This is not a rejection, however, a reviewer can later see if they agree or disagree with my judgment.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Pokelego999 ( talk · contribs) 23:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: David Fuchs ( talk · contribs) 19:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
In progress. Hit me up in a week or so if there's no review posted. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 19:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I think at this point the major issue with the article is meeting criterion 1 and 3, and I think it needs more work than the scope of a GAN, so I'm failing it at present. -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 23:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)