Persona (series) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Persona (series) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Persona" series – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
I propose this article be moved to Persona (series), because everywhere I read about these games I see it referred to as the Persona series, or as a part of the larger Shin Megami Tensei series, but never as the Shin Megami Tensei: Persona series. -- gakon5 ( talk / contribs) 01:13, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Can there be some mention of the role of Jungian Psychology in these series? I think it is a common element that deserves some attention and which seems to be invariably weaved into all the games I'm farmiliar with. Both the 'Shadow' and the 'Persona' are concepts/archetypes widely discussed by Jung, and many of the games seem to deal heavily with the collective unconscious. Some characters draw their names directly from Jungian elements. The name 'Philemon' was a deliberate reference to the name Jung gave his archetypal wise old man. Additional information/sources would be appreciated, and I feel that since these elements persist through all of the games in this series that it would be better mentioned here than in each individual article. 66.253.36.46 ( talk) 03:05, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
The series has sold 1.65 million just in Japan. [1] [2] Sillent DX ( talk) 16:13, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
There's a mention in the article that Persona 5 isn't marketed as an entry in the Shin Megami Tensei series. But as mentioned in the first sentence of the article, the Shin Megami Tensei labeling has always been a western marketing ploy and thus far we basically have no information about its western release. Therefore I would suggest removing it until there is more solid proof that ATLUS isn't planning to market it under the Shin Megami Tensei label internationally. -- Hamuko ( talk) 21:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Persona hasn't had the SMT label since Persona 4 Golden. I don't think 5 will have it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.107.38.201 ( talk) 06:28, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Rhain1999 ( talk · contribs) 06:54, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
I'll be taking this one, as discussed. Expect some comments within the next few days. I look forward to reading through this! – Rhain1999 ( talk to me) 06:54, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
All references look good; the fact that you consistently manage to find so many useful Japanese references is really impressive (I'm trying something similar with another article, and it's proving quite difficult). Also, bonus points for archiving. Images look good too; some editors might think that four non-free files is pushing it a little bit, but I'll let it slide (particularly due to their rationales).
That's all I could find; just a few minor changes (mostly suggestions/points for discussion). This is a really well-written article, and you should be proud of it. I thoroughly enjoyed reading it. Just putting it on hold until some minor changes are made. – Rhain1999 ( talk to me) 10:39, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
To avoid vandalism. — 73.47.37.131 ( talk) 22:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
With the announcement of Persona 3: Dancing Moon Night and Persona 5: Dancing Star Night, should the Dancing All Night games be categorised as a sub-series now? We've now got three games under that particular format. And with announcement of Persona Q2, if said game was to have another hypothetical entry, would be considered as an Etrian Odyssey series or Persona sub-series? Iftekharahmed96 ( talk) 14:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Persona (series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:54, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not Moved due to overwhelming consensus. ( non-admin closure) Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 18:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Persona (series) → Persona (franchise) – The lede describes it as a "franchise" and I would be inclined to agree. There are a lot of related works besides the video games. This would be a more accurate title. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 20:17, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
^I wasn't feeling so well yesterday. what I meant to say is I don't think Persona is commonly known as a "franchise". Blue Pumpkin Pie ( talk) 15:01, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
The images representing gameplay are terrible in my humble opinion. the top one is too dark and the second one is ok looking but since both images are very similar, hard to distinguish them. I would like Persona 3 battle screenshot and Social Link screenshot. the colors are easier to work with. Unfortunately for me, I only own the PSP version of Persona 3. Blue Pumpkin Pie ( talk) 19:05, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
So per my headline, do we really need to include Megami Tensei as a part of the |series=
parameter in the infobox? This very article makes it clear what the connection between the two are, so I think we could get rid of clutter by just including Persona in the parameter, especially as Sega Sammy (Atlus's holding company) now
reports sales for the Persona series separately (page 73), meaning even they view it as less of a sub-series and more of its own independent thing. ~
Dissident93 (
talk)
18:58, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Persona (series) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Persona (series) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Persona" series – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
I propose this article be moved to Persona (series), because everywhere I read about these games I see it referred to as the Persona series, or as a part of the larger Shin Megami Tensei series, but never as the Shin Megami Tensei: Persona series. -- gakon5 ( talk / contribs) 01:13, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Can there be some mention of the role of Jungian Psychology in these series? I think it is a common element that deserves some attention and which seems to be invariably weaved into all the games I'm farmiliar with. Both the 'Shadow' and the 'Persona' are concepts/archetypes widely discussed by Jung, and many of the games seem to deal heavily with the collective unconscious. Some characters draw their names directly from Jungian elements. The name 'Philemon' was a deliberate reference to the name Jung gave his archetypal wise old man. Additional information/sources would be appreciated, and I feel that since these elements persist through all of the games in this series that it would be better mentioned here than in each individual article. 66.253.36.46 ( talk) 03:05, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
The series has sold 1.65 million just in Japan. [1] [2] Sillent DX ( talk) 16:13, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
There's a mention in the article that Persona 5 isn't marketed as an entry in the Shin Megami Tensei series. But as mentioned in the first sentence of the article, the Shin Megami Tensei labeling has always been a western marketing ploy and thus far we basically have no information about its western release. Therefore I would suggest removing it until there is more solid proof that ATLUS isn't planning to market it under the Shin Megami Tensei label internationally. -- Hamuko ( talk) 21:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Persona hasn't had the SMT label since Persona 4 Golden. I don't think 5 will have it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.107.38.201 ( talk) 06:28, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Rhain1999 ( talk · contribs) 06:54, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
I'll be taking this one, as discussed. Expect some comments within the next few days. I look forward to reading through this! – Rhain1999 ( talk to me) 06:54, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
All references look good; the fact that you consistently manage to find so many useful Japanese references is really impressive (I'm trying something similar with another article, and it's proving quite difficult). Also, bonus points for archiving. Images look good too; some editors might think that four non-free files is pushing it a little bit, but I'll let it slide (particularly due to their rationales).
That's all I could find; just a few minor changes (mostly suggestions/points for discussion). This is a really well-written article, and you should be proud of it. I thoroughly enjoyed reading it. Just putting it on hold until some minor changes are made. – Rhain1999 ( talk to me) 10:39, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
To avoid vandalism. — 73.47.37.131 ( talk) 22:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
With the announcement of Persona 3: Dancing Moon Night and Persona 5: Dancing Star Night, should the Dancing All Night games be categorised as a sub-series now? We've now got three games under that particular format. And with announcement of Persona Q2, if said game was to have another hypothetical entry, would be considered as an Etrian Odyssey series or Persona sub-series? Iftekharahmed96 ( talk) 14:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Persona (series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:54, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not Moved due to overwhelming consensus. ( non-admin closure) Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 18:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Persona (series) → Persona (franchise) – The lede describes it as a "franchise" and I would be inclined to agree. There are a lot of related works besides the video games. This would be a more accurate title. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 20:17, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
^I wasn't feeling so well yesterday. what I meant to say is I don't think Persona is commonly known as a "franchise". Blue Pumpkin Pie ( talk) 15:01, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
The images representing gameplay are terrible in my humble opinion. the top one is too dark and the second one is ok looking but since both images are very similar, hard to distinguish them. I would like Persona 3 battle screenshot and Social Link screenshot. the colors are easier to work with. Unfortunately for me, I only own the PSP version of Persona 3. Blue Pumpkin Pie ( talk) 19:05, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
So per my headline, do we really need to include Megami Tensei as a part of the |series=
parameter in the infobox? This very article makes it clear what the connection between the two are, so I think we could get rid of clutter by just including Persona in the parameter, especially as Sega Sammy (Atlus's holding company) now
reports sales for the Persona series separately (page 73), meaning even they view it as less of a sub-series and more of its own independent thing. ~
Dissident93 (
talk)
18:58, 20 August 2018 (UTC)