![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 11 November 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Declaration of jihad by the Ottoman Empire page were merged into Ottoman Empire in World War I on 20 November 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
very good start. Needs more citations. Section on entry into war should summarize the separate article. Image on military structure needs to be clearer. There are templates for that, and perhaps a separate article on the order of battle is appropriate. auntieruth (talk) 17:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
A large part of this article contained content derived from the deleted "1915 insurgency in the Ottoman Empire" article
[1]. I have attempted to remove the most blatant pov material and wording derived from the deleted article
[2]. However I find that bias and fringe viewpoint material is embedded too deeply and is too widespread throughout this article to be easily removed and considerable work will be needed to get this article to an acceptable npov standard.
Tiptoethrutheminefield (
talk) 21:33, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
This article is really bad and needs to be thoroughly rewritten. Cut back a lot of the POV and just stick to the facts. Wikipedia Tarzan ( talk) 10:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
I think the following passage from the Balance sheet section should be reconsidered: "Furthermore, it is also likely that without Ottoman participation, neither the Russian revolution nor the entry of the U.S into the First World War would have occurred." Given all the factors and forces that led to the 1917 Russian Revolution, stating this event would likely not have occurred but for the Ottoman entry lengthening the war is a stretch. I believe this is an opinion and one that most historians would not support. The Revolution would have taken a different course, but this is different from the statement here. // Timothy :: talk 20:06, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Low visibility fork of a concept that is unlikely to be google searched. Would better serve readers as part of the larger article, adding more context to the participation of the empire in the war. Sadads ( talk) 16:10, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 11 November 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Declaration of jihad by the Ottoman Empire page were merged into Ottoman Empire in World War I on 20 November 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
very good start. Needs more citations. Section on entry into war should summarize the separate article. Image on military structure needs to be clearer. There are templates for that, and perhaps a separate article on the order of battle is appropriate. auntieruth (talk) 17:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
A large part of this article contained content derived from the deleted "1915 insurgency in the Ottoman Empire" article
[1]. I have attempted to remove the most blatant pov material and wording derived from the deleted article
[2]. However I find that bias and fringe viewpoint material is embedded too deeply and is too widespread throughout this article to be easily removed and considerable work will be needed to get this article to an acceptable npov standard.
Tiptoethrutheminefield (
talk) 21:33, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
This article is really bad and needs to be thoroughly rewritten. Cut back a lot of the POV and just stick to the facts. Wikipedia Tarzan ( talk) 10:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
I think the following passage from the Balance sheet section should be reconsidered: "Furthermore, it is also likely that without Ottoman participation, neither the Russian revolution nor the entry of the U.S into the First World War would have occurred." Given all the factors and forces that led to the 1917 Russian Revolution, stating this event would likely not have occurred but for the Ottoman entry lengthening the war is a stretch. I believe this is an opinion and one that most historians would not support. The Revolution would have taken a different course, but this is different from the statement here. // Timothy :: talk 20:06, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Low visibility fork of a concept that is unlikely to be google searched. Would better serve readers as part of the larger article, adding more context to the participation of the empire in the war. Sadads ( talk) 16:10, 15 August 2022 (UTC)