Nonviolent Communication was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Nonviolent Communication article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 21 April 2008. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
@ Biogeographist: Thanks for trying to add Program on Negotiation to the Nonviolent Communication article body as I suggested. Unfortunately, your edit made it sound like Little had compared Program on Negotiation to NVC, which she had not. I reverted your edit. I doubt that Program on Negotiation has a place in the NVC article, but I bear no hard feelings if you want to try again. Daask ( talk) 22:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help){{
cite book}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help){{
cite book}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help){{
cite book}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help){{
cite book}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help){{
cite journal}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help)First, huge thanks to all who have worked on this article. It's great! I'd like to add a section on nvc in the classroom, dividing into k-12 and college classrooms. I'm thinking it fits best under research since what I have to offer really is a review of the literature on this - but thought I would ask first if folks thought it should go elsewhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sara.koopman ( talk • contribs) 15:45, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
The introduction clearly presents the method non-neutrally by making remarks like:
The result is interpersonal harmony and learning for future cooperation.
However, due to its far-reaching impact, has many beneficial "side effects" as a spiritual practice, as a set of values, as parenting Best Practices, as a tool for social change, as a mediation tool, as an educational orientation, and as a worldview.
NVC greatest impact has been in personal development, relationships, and social change.
At its heart is a belief all human beings have capacity for compassion and empathy.
I feel like the article does a good job presenting the common criticisms and remarks in "Research" and "Responses", but the introduction seems to have lines with strongly positive opinions instead of facts, while the references used are academic opinions.
I added an Unbalanced tag as of May 2019. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agucova ( talk • contribs)
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 15:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Nonviolent Communication → Nonviolent communication – Since the title is not referring to a proper name, "communication" should be lowercase, per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization). ~ BappleBusiness [talk] 12:50, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Now the problems I've found with this page really only show the state of the page now compared probably to how much better it used to be in 2012, when it was listed as a good article. But now, there are a lot of problems with the page:
A lot of work needs to be done on this article in order for it to be GA material again. There is biased content and too much of it is unsourced. Therefore I'm submitting it for reassessment. - NowIsntItTime( chats)( doings) 18:29, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Nonviolent Communication was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Nonviolent Communication article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 21 April 2008. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
@ Biogeographist: Thanks for trying to add Program on Negotiation to the Nonviolent Communication article body as I suggested. Unfortunately, your edit made it sound like Little had compared Program on Negotiation to NVC, which she had not. I reverted your edit. I doubt that Program on Negotiation has a place in the NVC article, but I bear no hard feelings if you want to try again. Daask ( talk) 22:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help){{
cite book}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help){{
cite book}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help){{
cite book}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help){{
cite book}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help){{
cite journal}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help)First, huge thanks to all who have worked on this article. It's great! I'd like to add a section on nvc in the classroom, dividing into k-12 and college classrooms. I'm thinking it fits best under research since what I have to offer really is a review of the literature on this - but thought I would ask first if folks thought it should go elsewhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sara.koopman ( talk • contribs) 15:45, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
The introduction clearly presents the method non-neutrally by making remarks like:
The result is interpersonal harmony and learning for future cooperation.
However, due to its far-reaching impact, has many beneficial "side effects" as a spiritual practice, as a set of values, as parenting Best Practices, as a tool for social change, as a mediation tool, as an educational orientation, and as a worldview.
NVC greatest impact has been in personal development, relationships, and social change.
At its heart is a belief all human beings have capacity for compassion and empathy.
I feel like the article does a good job presenting the common criticisms and remarks in "Research" and "Responses", but the introduction seems to have lines with strongly positive opinions instead of facts, while the references used are academic opinions.
I added an Unbalanced tag as of May 2019. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agucova ( talk • contribs)
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 15:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Nonviolent Communication → Nonviolent communication – Since the title is not referring to a proper name, "communication" should be lowercase, per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization). ~ BappleBusiness [talk] 12:50, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Now the problems I've found with this page really only show the state of the page now compared probably to how much better it used to be in 2012, when it was listed as a good article. But now, there are a lot of problems with the page:
A lot of work needs to be done on this article in order for it to be GA material again. There is biased content and too much of it is unsourced. Therefore I'm submitting it for reassessment. - NowIsntItTime( chats)( doings) 18:29, 7 January 2023 (UTC)