Sources cover the Switch's "classic" emulation as a feature within Switch Online, not as an
independently notable concept. Best to merge to parent section and only split out based on prose when warranted by an overabundance of content. (not
watching, please {{
ping}}
)
czar 09:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
All of the sources seem to say that this launched on September 18, so why does the article say that the service launched on September 19? -- Jpcase ( talk) 19:16, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
I began to notice that starting on February 19, 2020, games originally exclusive to the US & PAL regions' service will be released in Japan and vice versa. If this happens again in the future, we'll need to find a more wieldy way of showing what game was formerly exclusive to one region and when they will be/are released on the other region's service. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seco86484 ( talk • contribs) 02:32, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Apparently, Wikipedia editors are allowing uncited info on the page on April 29th 2020. Nintendo has not announced Game Boy games for Nintendo Switch. The games under "coming soon" have not been announced either. Either have an editor cite the announcements, or delete the wrong info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:9940:E5D9:D557:5939:9C77:190E ( talk) 09:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Can somebody add in the reception to the Nintendo Switch Online service? Many gamers aren't taking kindly to it.-- 24.44.76.88 ( talk) 16:11, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Ive seen people add section to the critism to stuff like Mario 3d all stars and they havent been removed. just do something simalier to that. the backlash is worthy of being mentioned if you ask me. Yeial ( talk) 18:38, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
I feel like there should be a section in the article dedicated to the controversy surrounding Switch online,as there is backlash agaisnt Switch online for many things,including the limited selection of games,and more importantly:the poor online connection that makes frames rates drop very low. I feel like the criticism has enough of a presence online to be worthy on being its own section on the article. any thoughts? Yeial ( talk) 18:34, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
The publisher of the Nintendo 64 version of Banjo-Kazooie is Nintendo. An IP holder is merely one of the parties that own intellectual property contained in the work and from whom permission is needed to distribute works; they are not interchangeable with the publisher, under whose name the work is made available to the public. For example, a game based on a James Bond film requires permission from the media company MGM, and if separate, the actors whose likenesses are used, to be published; this does not make MGM or any actor the publisher of the game. In other words, IP pertains to negotiations happening behind the scenes, whereas the publisher is the nominal brand. As such, it is not accurate to list Microsoft as the publisher of this version or this release of Banjo-Kazooie. Ozdarka ( talk) 16:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
The article currently has a list of Switch games that don't support the Cloud Saves feature of NSO. While the list then was ~60 titles, that list today, according to Nintendo's help page, is 139. Because of its length, would it be better to:
a) not have the list at all,
b) keep the list, but limit its scope (first party titles + Pokemon), or
c) update the list to include the titles not currently represented?
MooseMike ( talk) 17:56, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
I am surprised NO ONE has mentioned that emulation for N64 is now fixed!
I mean I know it was a big deal that it was bad when it first came out but time has passed and they updated it. Why don't we mention it? NakhlaMan ( talk) 09:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sources cover the Switch's "classic" emulation as a feature within Switch Online, not as an
independently notable concept. Best to merge to parent section and only split out based on prose when warranted by an overabundance of content. (not
watching, please {{
ping}}
)
czar 09:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
All of the sources seem to say that this launched on September 18, so why does the article say that the service launched on September 19? -- Jpcase ( talk) 19:16, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
I began to notice that starting on February 19, 2020, games originally exclusive to the US & PAL regions' service will be released in Japan and vice versa. If this happens again in the future, we'll need to find a more wieldy way of showing what game was formerly exclusive to one region and when they will be/are released on the other region's service. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seco86484 ( talk • contribs) 02:32, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Apparently, Wikipedia editors are allowing uncited info on the page on April 29th 2020. Nintendo has not announced Game Boy games for Nintendo Switch. The games under "coming soon" have not been announced either. Either have an editor cite the announcements, or delete the wrong info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:9940:E5D9:D557:5939:9C77:190E ( talk) 09:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Can somebody add in the reception to the Nintendo Switch Online service? Many gamers aren't taking kindly to it.-- 24.44.76.88 ( talk) 16:11, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Ive seen people add section to the critism to stuff like Mario 3d all stars and they havent been removed. just do something simalier to that. the backlash is worthy of being mentioned if you ask me. Yeial ( talk) 18:38, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
I feel like there should be a section in the article dedicated to the controversy surrounding Switch online,as there is backlash agaisnt Switch online for many things,including the limited selection of games,and more importantly:the poor online connection that makes frames rates drop very low. I feel like the criticism has enough of a presence online to be worthy on being its own section on the article. any thoughts? Yeial ( talk) 18:34, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
The publisher of the Nintendo 64 version of Banjo-Kazooie is Nintendo. An IP holder is merely one of the parties that own intellectual property contained in the work and from whom permission is needed to distribute works; they are not interchangeable with the publisher, under whose name the work is made available to the public. For example, a game based on a James Bond film requires permission from the media company MGM, and if separate, the actors whose likenesses are used, to be published; this does not make MGM or any actor the publisher of the game. In other words, IP pertains to negotiations happening behind the scenes, whereas the publisher is the nominal brand. As such, it is not accurate to list Microsoft as the publisher of this version or this release of Banjo-Kazooie. Ozdarka ( talk) 16:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
The article currently has a list of Switch games that don't support the Cloud Saves feature of NSO. While the list then was ~60 titles, that list today, according to Nintendo's help page, is 139. Because of its length, would it be better to:
a) not have the list at all,
b) keep the list, but limit its scope (first party titles + Pokemon), or
c) update the list to include the titles not currently represented?
MooseMike ( talk) 17:56, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
I am surprised NO ONE has mentioned that emulation for N64 is now fixed!
I mean I know it was a big deal that it was bad when it first came out but time has passed and they updated it. Why don't we mention it? NakhlaMan ( talk) 09:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)