![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2019 and 28 March 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Kanraru. Peer reviewers:
Realyuang,
Reinako.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 01:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
The whole Criticism section may be valid, but its written in such a way that the neutrality of the content is in question. There are basic conjecture statements with no sources at all. Needs some serious cleanup with some secondary sources supporting it, written from a more neutral POV. Evaders99 ( talk) 06:31, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
How can the website run ads when the license is non-commercial? Do the terms of use grant a special commercial license to the website host? And how was such a license obtained from the authors of the pre-fork content? Nemo 14:54, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
I've tried my best in putting more content and rewriting some of the information on this article to be more neutral and informative. I tried to address both the neutrality concern on Gender Equalism section on Controversies, and also the non-commercial issue towards the end of Administration section. There's no clear answer within the site towards this issue either, so I had to leave it off in that state. Let me know if there are fixes to be had. Kanraru ( talk) 10:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
I've cleaned up most of the writing; it was clear most of it was written by those less proficent in English. Bibliac ( talk) 07:34, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 06:23, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2019 and 28 March 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Kanraru. Peer reviewers:
Realyuang,
Reinako.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 01:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
The whole Criticism section may be valid, but its written in such a way that the neutrality of the content is in question. There are basic conjecture statements with no sources at all. Needs some serious cleanup with some secondary sources supporting it, written from a more neutral POV. Evaders99 ( talk) 06:31, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
How can the website run ads when the license is non-commercial? Do the terms of use grant a special commercial license to the website host? And how was such a license obtained from the authors of the pre-fork content? Nemo 14:54, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
I've tried my best in putting more content and rewriting some of the information on this article to be more neutral and informative. I tried to address both the neutrality concern on Gender Equalism section on Controversies, and also the non-commercial issue towards the end of Administration section. There's no clear answer within the site towards this issue either, so I had to leave it off in that state. Let me know if there are fixes to be had. Kanraru ( talk) 10:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
I've cleaned up most of the writing; it was clear most of it was written by those less proficent in English. Bibliac ( talk) 07:34, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 06:23, 9 August 2021 (UTC)