This article was nominated for deletion on 31 August 2022. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mainstream (disambiguation) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It's ironic how the word "mainstream" is criticized on this article yet the whole rationale and criteria on the admissibility of a source as "reliable" on Wikipedia is based on how mainstream it is. 184.96.220.184 ( talk) 08:19, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Morover, on Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines it says that talk pages are for discussion to improve the article itself, not for discussion on the topic of the article. I would delete this Talk Page, because only discussions of the topic itself, and other topics, are on it, but I do not know how to :( Brianc26 ( talk) 02:14, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mainstream. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:24, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
I must conclude that your article is "about nonsense".
???(?) 85.149.24.135 ( talk) 14:42, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
It is noteworthy that so much of this article seems lifted from Gail Robinson and her book Mass Communication and Journalism (2019; see pp. 96-98), and yet nowhere do I see her being credited. JohnMBauer ( talk) 06:20, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
This article seems to me like a glorified disambig, discussing various concepts of "mainstream this" and "mainstream that", but without much to connect them. It's somewhat ORish. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:07, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 31 August 2022. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mainstream (disambiguation) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It's ironic how the word "mainstream" is criticized on this article yet the whole rationale and criteria on the admissibility of a source as "reliable" on Wikipedia is based on how mainstream it is. 184.96.220.184 ( talk) 08:19, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Morover, on Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines it says that talk pages are for discussion to improve the article itself, not for discussion on the topic of the article. I would delete this Talk Page, because only discussions of the topic itself, and other topics, are on it, but I do not know how to :( Brianc26 ( talk) 02:14, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mainstream. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:24, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
I must conclude that your article is "about nonsense".
???(?) 85.149.24.135 ( talk) 14:42, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
It is noteworthy that so much of this article seems lifted from Gail Robinson and her book Mass Communication and Journalism (2019; see pp. 96-98), and yet nowhere do I see her being credited. JohnMBauer ( talk) 06:20, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
This article seems to me like a glorified disambig, discussing various concepts of "mainstream this" and "mainstream that", but without much to connect them. It's somewhat ORish. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:07, 31 August 2022 (UTC)