This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Lost in Translation (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | Lost in Translation (film) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 29, 2023. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of List of accolades received by Lost in Translation (film) was copied or moved into Lost in Translation (film) with this edit on 20:54, 10 May 2020. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
-some more articles to use.-- J.D. ( talk) 18:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
-more articles to use.-- J.D. ( talk) 13:38, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
"Lost in Translation was boosted by universal critical acclaim...It has a rating of 95% "Certified Fresh" on Rotten Tomatoes..."
the 95% (as opposed to 100%) means "universal" can't be used re the critical acclaim, unless with a qualifier, like "near-universal". needs changing to avoid being logically contradictory. 63.142.146.194 ( talk) 05:56, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Ive tried to make an edit and its gone awry. Please help me. 81.156.136.199 ( talk) 09:31, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Such an heated debate about the nationality of the film. Will we find the truth - or will it be Lost in the Trans...? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.166.178 ( talk) 20:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lost in Translation (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Can we remove the final sentence of the lede? Not only does it add much information to call a film as "often regarded as one of the best films", but it can't really be verified in any sense. How do you define "regarded as one of the best"? Box office sales? Critics reviews? Awards? It just seems like a weasel word here. ChunyangD ( talk) 23:16, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Lost in Translation (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | Lost in Translation (film) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 29, 2023. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of List of accolades received by Lost in Translation (film) was copied or moved into Lost in Translation (film) with this edit on 20:54, 10 May 2020. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
-some more articles to use.-- J.D. ( talk) 18:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
-more articles to use.-- J.D. ( talk) 13:38, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
"Lost in Translation was boosted by universal critical acclaim...It has a rating of 95% "Certified Fresh" on Rotten Tomatoes..."
the 95% (as opposed to 100%) means "universal" can't be used re the critical acclaim, unless with a qualifier, like "near-universal". needs changing to avoid being logically contradictory. 63.142.146.194 ( talk) 05:56, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Ive tried to make an edit and its gone awry. Please help me. 81.156.136.199 ( talk) 09:31, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Such an heated debate about the nationality of the film. Will we find the truth - or will it be Lost in the Trans...? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.166.178 ( talk) 20:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lost in Translation (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Can we remove the final sentence of the lede? Not only does it add much information to call a film as "often regarded as one of the best films", but it can't really be verified in any sense. How do you define "regarded as one of the best"? Box office sales? Critics reviews? Awards? It just seems like a weasel word here. ChunyangD ( talk) 23:16, 23 July 2018 (UTC)