![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Lithuanian press ban appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 4 November 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 24, 2012, April 24, 2015, and April 24, 2019. |
It appears that the Lithuanian press ban was not unique (see Russification#Poland_and_Lithuania); Belarusian, Ukrainian and Polish languages shared a similar fate - which should be noted in the article, and a comparison of to what extent other languages (Belorussian, Polish, Ukrainian, etc.) were similarly persecuted should be added.
This source mentions persecution of Ukrainian language, although this source gives the date of a ban for 1876; this gives the date for bans as 1870s). They probably refer to Ems Ukaz. This and this however mention restriction after the Polish uprising of 1863 (lifted in 1905).
This and this note that Belarussian was also banned specifically after the January Uprising (1863).
This mentions bans on Lithuanian, Ukrainian and Belarusian.
This source mentions restrictions on Polish language after 1863; a ban was proposed, ban on religious use "in late 19th century" mentioned here.
I particularly wonder if we can say that all four of those languages shared a similar fate (ban), or were there notable differences in their persecution? -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 23:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
The Valuyev circular happened as a result of the Polish uprising. Up until 63 Polish was the language spoken on the streets of Kyiv. It was replaced by Russian. Bandurist ( talk) 00:14, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Per the request on my talk page, here are the things that I would pick on if I were to do a GA review of the article right now:
I hope these comments help you on your quest to GA. Overall the article looks really nice, and the issues above are fairly minor. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. I'm not watching this page, so please drop a note on my talk page if you reply here. Dana boomer ( talk) 17:58, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Images reduced so far
1;
2.
M.K. (
talk)
13:21, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lithuanian press ban. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Lithuanian press ban appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 4 November 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 24, 2012, April 24, 2015, and April 24, 2019. |
It appears that the Lithuanian press ban was not unique (see Russification#Poland_and_Lithuania); Belarusian, Ukrainian and Polish languages shared a similar fate - which should be noted in the article, and a comparison of to what extent other languages (Belorussian, Polish, Ukrainian, etc.) were similarly persecuted should be added.
This source mentions persecution of Ukrainian language, although this source gives the date of a ban for 1876; this gives the date for bans as 1870s). They probably refer to Ems Ukaz. This and this however mention restriction after the Polish uprising of 1863 (lifted in 1905).
This and this note that Belarussian was also banned specifically after the January Uprising (1863).
This mentions bans on Lithuanian, Ukrainian and Belarusian.
This source mentions restrictions on Polish language after 1863; a ban was proposed, ban on religious use "in late 19th century" mentioned here.
I particularly wonder if we can say that all four of those languages shared a similar fate (ban), or were there notable differences in their persecution? -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 23:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
The Valuyev circular happened as a result of the Polish uprising. Up until 63 Polish was the language spoken on the streets of Kyiv. It was replaced by Russian. Bandurist ( talk) 00:14, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Per the request on my talk page, here are the things that I would pick on if I were to do a GA review of the article right now:
I hope these comments help you on your quest to GA. Overall the article looks really nice, and the issues above are fairly minor. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. I'm not watching this page, so please drop a note on my talk page if you reply here. Dana boomer ( talk) 17:58, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Images reduced so far
1;
2.
M.K. (
talk)
13:21, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lithuanian press ban. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)