Lechmere station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
Lechmere station is part of the Green Line Extension series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
August 28, 2022. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Lechmere station was proposed for replacement in 1924 – yet was in use until 2020? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: consensus to move the pages at this time, per the discussion below. Please assist in creating any new redirects that may prove helpful. Dekimasu よ! 04:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
– Per WP:USSTATION, stations without the need for disambiguation should be named "xxx station", and ones requiring it should be named "xxx station (disambiguator)". This list is in alphabetical order first of Category:Green Line (MBTA) stations, and then lists Category:Silver Line (MBTA) stations in alphabetical order. Daybeers ( talk) 01:15, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
{{ Lechmere timeline}} is inaccessible and hard to parse even for a sighted person. What would be some better ways to convey this information? Mackensen (talk) 15:12, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
@ Pi.1415926535: Sorry, but I have to object to your changes to the article lede. The station still exists and is in service for the same customers, even though train service has been replaced by bus service at the present location. Yes, a new station is under construction and that should be mentioned early in the intro, but that is not the primary meaning of "Lechmere station" at the present time. It is still listed as a functioning station by the MBTA [1], which is of course a reliable source. I do not object to the photo of the under-construction station as the lede photo, as it is arguably more interesting than a couple of trains or buses and can be updated periodically to reflect progress.-- agr ( talk) 15:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sammi Brie ( talk · contribs) 03:35, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Some copy changes, one minor issue with a source, and you'll be good to go. You might find more given how long it's been! 7-day hold. Ping me when done.
Sammi Brie (she/her •
t •
c) 04:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
I chose 12 of the 156 reference numbers at random for spot checks. All check out; one seems to need a bit of reconciling with the source.
Review in progress
The result was: promoted by
Kavyansh.Singh (
talk) 12:09, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Created by Pi.1415926535 ( talk). Self-nominated at 06:11, 12 August 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Lechmere station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
Lechmere station is part of the Green Line Extension series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
August 28, 2022. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Lechmere station was proposed for replacement in 1924 – yet was in use until 2020? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: consensus to move the pages at this time, per the discussion below. Please assist in creating any new redirects that may prove helpful. Dekimasu よ! 04:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
– Per WP:USSTATION, stations without the need for disambiguation should be named "xxx station", and ones requiring it should be named "xxx station (disambiguator)". This list is in alphabetical order first of Category:Green Line (MBTA) stations, and then lists Category:Silver Line (MBTA) stations in alphabetical order. Daybeers ( talk) 01:15, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
{{ Lechmere timeline}} is inaccessible and hard to parse even for a sighted person. What would be some better ways to convey this information? Mackensen (talk) 15:12, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
@ Pi.1415926535: Sorry, but I have to object to your changes to the article lede. The station still exists and is in service for the same customers, even though train service has been replaced by bus service at the present location. Yes, a new station is under construction and that should be mentioned early in the intro, but that is not the primary meaning of "Lechmere station" at the present time. It is still listed as a functioning station by the MBTA [1], which is of course a reliable source. I do not object to the photo of the under-construction station as the lede photo, as it is arguably more interesting than a couple of trains or buses and can be updated periodically to reflect progress.-- agr ( talk) 15:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sammi Brie ( talk · contribs) 03:35, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Some copy changes, one minor issue with a source, and you'll be good to go. You might find more given how long it's been! 7-day hold. Ping me when done.
Sammi Brie (she/her •
t •
c) 04:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
I chose 12 of the 156 reference numbers at random for spot checks. All check out; one seems to need a bit of reconciling with the source.
Review in progress
The result was: promoted by
Kavyansh.Singh (
talk) 12:09, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Created by Pi.1415926535 ( talk). Self-nominated at 06:11, 12 August 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |