![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
It's noteworthy that a movie Liwayway ng kalayaan (1944) was made during the Japanese occupation. Armored vehicle buffs would find this movie interesting because it gives viewers a rare glimpse of captured American M3 light tanks and captured Universal Carriers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.57.89.34 ( talk) 12:38, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
This article, and quite a number of others, use the term recognized guerrilla.
What is the exact meaning? "Recognized", as opposed as to bandit groups?
Varlaam (
talk) 08:21, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Please do not revert my latest edit.Because it is very essential and important to give them credit for their efforts in the Allied campaign in the liberation of the Philippines.And as I go researching about Philippines during World War II,the resistance forces efforts are mostly overlooked. Thank you.Mabuhay Philippines!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.55.93.68 ( talk) 14:19, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(
help)An IP editor has recently added content that was supported by references that were not verifiable online. Although it is not required to have a source be available online, it is necessary for a source to be verifiable, in order to verify content in question. I have removed content that appears to be WP:OR, and tagged the remaining questionable reference source, and tagged the section.
I propose removing the content all together if the content cannot be independently verified by a third party registered user. -- RightCowLeftCoast ( talk) 18:41, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Per WP:CANVASS#appropriate notification I have notified WP:PINOY & WP:MILHIST of this discussion. -- RightCowLeftCoast ( talk) 18:48, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
I've removed a {{ disputed-section}} template added in this August 2011 edit. Per the template docs, there should be a talk page section here explaining what is disputed. The edit which placed the template removed content from the article, so I presume that the article no longer contains the content which was disputed. See the links in the foregoing for more info. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 08:45, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Among the signal units of Col Peralta were the 61 Signal Company manned by 2Lt Ludovico Arroyo Bañas, which was attached to forces of the 6th Military Division, stationed in Passi, Iloilo, under the command of Capt. Eliseo Espia; and the 64th Signal Company of the same Military Division, under the Command of Lt. Col. Cesar Hechanova, to which 2Lt. Bañas was given the responsibility sometime later.
The financial situation of anti-Japanese guerilla fighters.
Rajmaan ( talk) 02:56, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2007/11/06/2003386494
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2007/11/06/2003386494/2
http://www.bt.com.bn/focus/2007/10/31/a_life_haunted_by_wwii_surgical_killings
http://www.forties.net/japconfession.html
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5ht5P8U54dLa7dH9mqjKyurq0zQMw?hl=en
http://books.google.com/books?id=glVxAAAAMAAJ
http://books.google.com/books?id=glVxAAAAMAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=butcher
http://books.google.com/books?id=glVxAAAAMAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=tortured
http://books.google.com/books?id=glVxAAAAMAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=beheaded
http://books.google.com/books?id=5Qf39DpguysC&pg=PA125#v=onepage&q&f=false
Page 1702
Page 69
Page 1702
Page 56
Page 111
Page 111
PARRANG SABBIL: RITUAL SUICIDE AMONG THE TAUSUG OF JOLO by THOMAS M. KIEFER Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde Deel 129, 1ste Afl., ANTHROPOLOGICA XV (1973) , pp. 108-123 Published by: KITLV, Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27861310
http://books.google.com/books?id=6T39iCmUzMkC&pg=PA2#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=6T39iCmUzMkC&pg=PA47#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=6T39iCmUzMkC&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=6T39iCmUzMkC&pg=PA3#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=tm8tSwyTa7AC&pg=PA178#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://cryptome.org/2014/04/spy-muslim.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20110813095846/http://www.ndic.edu/press/pdf/5160.pdf http://ni-u.edu/ni_press/pdf/A_Muslim_Archipelago.pdf http://cgsc.cdmhost.com/utils/getdownloaditem/collection/p4013coll11/id/695/filename/696.pdf/mapsto/pdf http://cgsc.cdmhost.com/cdm/ref/collection/p4013coll11/id/695 http://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/005679120
http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/mar/assessment.asp?groupId=84003
http://nointervention.com/archive/pubs/CWIS/imnr.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20070203183239/http://www.cwis.org/fwj/21/imnr.html
http://books.google.com/books?id=KkO-DHcRVMoC&pg=PA124#v=onepage&q&f=false
https://www.saudiaramcoworld.com/issue/196504/kris.and.crescent.htm
http://www.fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/sword.htm
http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,802183,00.html
http://books.google.com/books?id=ZgWnN4hyjoQC&pg=PA271#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan ( talk) 22:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Rajmaan ( talk) 01:18, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Japanese occupation of British Borneo
Chinese and Suluk Tausug launched joint uprising in 10/10/1943 against the Japanese on Borneo. The Japanese then nearly exterminated the Suluks, massacring nearly all their men, and women and children at a mosque.
http://books.google.com/books?id=7PuvyKPz5f4C&pg=RA1-PA469#v=onepage&q&f=false
Suluks were led by Panglima Ali, Chinese were led by Alberk Kwok (I. N. Kwok)(Guo Yi Nan)(Guo Hengnan) Teochew
Imam Marajukim, from Sulu, coordinated cooperation among the Suluks in the Philippines and Suluks in Borneo, to procure supplies for the resistance against the Japanese.
Rajmaan ( talk) 19:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Rajmaan ( talk) 17:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
18:09, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
http://www.history.army.mil/books/wwii/70-42/70-424.html
We need a 4th column for Moro Muslims who fought both Japanese and the Americans. The pro-American Moros can go on the American column, but the unaffiliated Moros who fought both sides need their own column. Rajmaan ( talk) 03:43, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
The content regarding the Moro's actions during the occupation, as part of the resistance appears to be duplicated in the article Philippine resistance against Japan. Perhaps it should be summarized here, or removed all together?-- RightCowLeftCoast ( talk) 05:26, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Japanese occupation of the Philippines. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 01:14, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
RightCowLeftCoast (RCLC) placed a message on my user talk page today, saying
Yes. I see that. The other editor involved is an unregistered user, 112.200.103.239. (239) who has been editing from that IP address since March 20 and who, from his edit history appears to have a serious interest in this topical area.
RCLC, I agree re BRD and EW, but I'm not going to take admin action at this point. Since 239, being an anon, has no watchlist, I will place a message on that anon's talk page asking that he join discussion here.
239, I suggest that you establish a Wikipedia account (see Wikipedia:Why create an account?), that you read WP:EW and WP:BRD, and that you engage in discussion here.
I am not going to edit the article re the infobox formatting at this point but, after looking at the two versions of the article wikilinked from the message which RCLC left me, I do have some comments and a suggestion.
IMO, this version of the article after the reversion by RCLC is unsightly. The infobox is too wide, unduly restricting lead section prose to a narrow strip alongside it.
Today is a travel day for me and I don't have the time right now to work this out myself, but I suggest that the combatant parameters of the infobox be reworked to name something like Allied forces as combatant1 and to use the combatant1a/combatant1b/combatant1c parameters of {{ Infobox military conflict}} to present U.S. forces, Hukbalahap forces, and Unaffiliated Moro Muslim insurgents as subcomponents of combatant1.
Also, it occurs to me as an afterthought not well thought out that, since the article is titled Japanese occupation of the Philippines, perhaps the Japanese forces ought to be presented as combatant1. Perhaps not, but it's a thought. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Please provide information or battle that occurred between Huk Forces or the Moro Jurdamentados against the Commonwealth or the United States during WW2. Even if you go to a WW2 museum in the Philippines, they even now recognize the HUK Forces as a Guerrilla opposed to the Japanese and therefore did not encounter clashes during the Occupation. HeneralVicente23 (talk) 00:35, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
What if we change the Infobox rather than a Military Conflict to a Former Country? just like Malaya and Dutch East Indies? where they use a Former Country type. Just a suggestion BTW. HeneralVicente23 (talk) 17:43, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Japanese occupation of the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:14, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Japanese occupation of the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:09, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
It's noteworthy that a movie Liwayway ng kalayaan (1944) was made during the Japanese occupation. Armored vehicle buffs would find this movie interesting because it gives viewers a rare glimpse of captured American M3 light tanks and captured Universal Carriers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.57.89.34 ( talk) 12:38, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
This article, and quite a number of others, use the term recognized guerrilla.
What is the exact meaning? "Recognized", as opposed as to bandit groups?
Varlaam (
talk) 08:21, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Please do not revert my latest edit.Because it is very essential and important to give them credit for their efforts in the Allied campaign in the liberation of the Philippines.And as I go researching about Philippines during World War II,the resistance forces efforts are mostly overlooked. Thank you.Mabuhay Philippines!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.55.93.68 ( talk) 14:19, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(
help)An IP editor has recently added content that was supported by references that were not verifiable online. Although it is not required to have a source be available online, it is necessary for a source to be verifiable, in order to verify content in question. I have removed content that appears to be WP:OR, and tagged the remaining questionable reference source, and tagged the section.
I propose removing the content all together if the content cannot be independently verified by a third party registered user. -- RightCowLeftCoast ( talk) 18:41, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Per WP:CANVASS#appropriate notification I have notified WP:PINOY & WP:MILHIST of this discussion. -- RightCowLeftCoast ( talk) 18:48, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
I've removed a {{ disputed-section}} template added in this August 2011 edit. Per the template docs, there should be a talk page section here explaining what is disputed. The edit which placed the template removed content from the article, so I presume that the article no longer contains the content which was disputed. See the links in the foregoing for more info. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 08:45, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Among the signal units of Col Peralta were the 61 Signal Company manned by 2Lt Ludovico Arroyo Bañas, which was attached to forces of the 6th Military Division, stationed in Passi, Iloilo, under the command of Capt. Eliseo Espia; and the 64th Signal Company of the same Military Division, under the Command of Lt. Col. Cesar Hechanova, to which 2Lt. Bañas was given the responsibility sometime later.
The financial situation of anti-Japanese guerilla fighters.
Rajmaan ( talk) 02:56, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2007/11/06/2003386494
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2007/11/06/2003386494/2
http://www.bt.com.bn/focus/2007/10/31/a_life_haunted_by_wwii_surgical_killings
http://www.forties.net/japconfession.html
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5ht5P8U54dLa7dH9mqjKyurq0zQMw?hl=en
http://books.google.com/books?id=glVxAAAAMAAJ
http://books.google.com/books?id=glVxAAAAMAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=butcher
http://books.google.com/books?id=glVxAAAAMAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=tortured
http://books.google.com/books?id=glVxAAAAMAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=beheaded
http://books.google.com/books?id=5Qf39DpguysC&pg=PA125#v=onepage&q&f=false
Page 1702
Page 69
Page 1702
Page 56
Page 111
Page 111
PARRANG SABBIL: RITUAL SUICIDE AMONG THE TAUSUG OF JOLO by THOMAS M. KIEFER Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde Deel 129, 1ste Afl., ANTHROPOLOGICA XV (1973) , pp. 108-123 Published by: KITLV, Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27861310
http://books.google.com/books?id=6T39iCmUzMkC&pg=PA2#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=6T39iCmUzMkC&pg=PA47#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=6T39iCmUzMkC&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=6T39iCmUzMkC&pg=PA3#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=tm8tSwyTa7AC&pg=PA178#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://cryptome.org/2014/04/spy-muslim.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20110813095846/http://www.ndic.edu/press/pdf/5160.pdf http://ni-u.edu/ni_press/pdf/A_Muslim_Archipelago.pdf http://cgsc.cdmhost.com/utils/getdownloaditem/collection/p4013coll11/id/695/filename/696.pdf/mapsto/pdf http://cgsc.cdmhost.com/cdm/ref/collection/p4013coll11/id/695 http://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/005679120
http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/mar/assessment.asp?groupId=84003
http://nointervention.com/archive/pubs/CWIS/imnr.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20070203183239/http://www.cwis.org/fwj/21/imnr.html
http://books.google.com/books?id=KkO-DHcRVMoC&pg=PA124#v=onepage&q&f=false
https://www.saudiaramcoworld.com/issue/196504/kris.and.crescent.htm
http://www.fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/sword.htm
http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,802183,00.html
http://books.google.com/books?id=ZgWnN4hyjoQC&pg=PA271#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan ( talk) 22:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Rajmaan ( talk) 01:18, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Japanese occupation of British Borneo
Chinese and Suluk Tausug launched joint uprising in 10/10/1943 against the Japanese on Borneo. The Japanese then nearly exterminated the Suluks, massacring nearly all their men, and women and children at a mosque.
http://books.google.com/books?id=7PuvyKPz5f4C&pg=RA1-PA469#v=onepage&q&f=false
Suluks were led by Panglima Ali, Chinese were led by Alberk Kwok (I. N. Kwok)(Guo Yi Nan)(Guo Hengnan) Teochew
Imam Marajukim, from Sulu, coordinated cooperation among the Suluks in the Philippines and Suluks in Borneo, to procure supplies for the resistance against the Japanese.
Rajmaan ( talk) 19:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Rajmaan ( talk) 17:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
18:09, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
http://www.history.army.mil/books/wwii/70-42/70-424.html
We need a 4th column for Moro Muslims who fought both Japanese and the Americans. The pro-American Moros can go on the American column, but the unaffiliated Moros who fought both sides need their own column. Rajmaan ( talk) 03:43, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
The content regarding the Moro's actions during the occupation, as part of the resistance appears to be duplicated in the article Philippine resistance against Japan. Perhaps it should be summarized here, or removed all together?-- RightCowLeftCoast ( talk) 05:26, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Japanese occupation of the Philippines. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 01:14, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
RightCowLeftCoast (RCLC) placed a message on my user talk page today, saying
Yes. I see that. The other editor involved is an unregistered user, 112.200.103.239. (239) who has been editing from that IP address since March 20 and who, from his edit history appears to have a serious interest in this topical area.
RCLC, I agree re BRD and EW, but I'm not going to take admin action at this point. Since 239, being an anon, has no watchlist, I will place a message on that anon's talk page asking that he join discussion here.
239, I suggest that you establish a Wikipedia account (see Wikipedia:Why create an account?), that you read WP:EW and WP:BRD, and that you engage in discussion here.
I am not going to edit the article re the infobox formatting at this point but, after looking at the two versions of the article wikilinked from the message which RCLC left me, I do have some comments and a suggestion.
IMO, this version of the article after the reversion by RCLC is unsightly. The infobox is too wide, unduly restricting lead section prose to a narrow strip alongside it.
Today is a travel day for me and I don't have the time right now to work this out myself, but I suggest that the combatant parameters of the infobox be reworked to name something like Allied forces as combatant1 and to use the combatant1a/combatant1b/combatant1c parameters of {{ Infobox military conflict}} to present U.S. forces, Hukbalahap forces, and Unaffiliated Moro Muslim insurgents as subcomponents of combatant1.
Also, it occurs to me as an afterthought not well thought out that, since the article is titled Japanese occupation of the Philippines, perhaps the Japanese forces ought to be presented as combatant1. Perhaps not, but it's a thought. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Please provide information or battle that occurred between Huk Forces or the Moro Jurdamentados against the Commonwealth or the United States during WW2. Even if you go to a WW2 museum in the Philippines, they even now recognize the HUK Forces as a Guerrilla opposed to the Japanese and therefore did not encounter clashes during the Occupation. HeneralVicente23 (talk) 00:35, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
What if we change the Infobox rather than a Military Conflict to a Former Country? just like Malaya and Dutch East Indies? where they use a Former Country type. Just a suggestion BTW. HeneralVicente23 (talk) 17:43, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Japanese occupation of the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:14, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Japanese occupation of the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:09, 22 November 2017 (UTC)