[ disputed ]
Usage
{{ Disputed inline|Talk page section|date=April 2024}}
To link to a centralized discussion on a page other than the article's
talk page, use the |talk= parameter (a.k.a. |talkpage=, |discuss=, |discussion=) to give the location:
{{ Disputed inline|talk=Talk:Topic#Talk page section|date=April 2024}}
The parameter |for= can be used to give a short reason that displays in the tag (do not use this for editorializing, or else any other editor may refactor such a comment out); the comment added here will be preceded by "for:" and the entire comment put in a round-bracketed parenthetical:
{{ Disputed inline|Talk page section|for=conflict with sources cited above|date=April 2024}}
{{ Disputed inline}} should not be used without also raising the issue on the talk page and, as a general practice, should remain in place while the talk page discussion is active.
Articles with disputed statements
This inline template helps highlight a particular disputed statement or alleged fact, in contrast to the {{ Disputed}} and {{ Disputed section}} templates which mark a whole article or section as disputed. This is particularly helpful when there are reliable sources supporting two or more different claims. {{ Disputed inline}} should not be used without also raising the issue on the talk page. When used on an article page, the word "disputed" links to Wikipedia:Disputed statement, and the article is placed in Category:Accuracy disputes or one of its dated sub-categories. This template is a more strongly worded version of {{ Dubious}}, which indicates a potential dispute, most often a question about reliable sourcing for the statement/fact at issue; {{ Disputed inline}} indicates that at least one editor believes there is no question that the statement has a verifiability problem.
Other pages
If this tag is used outside the article namespace, it will not be categorized in an article cleanup category, and the word "disputed" links to Wikipedia:Consensus. It can be used to indicate an unresolved dispute and a talk page topic about the dispute, e.g. an issue at a guideline or WikiProject page.
For pages other than articles, use {{ Under discussion inline}}, which categorizes differently.
TemplateData
TemplateData for Disputed inline
Inline template used to mark the content being disputed.
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talk page section | 1 | Talk page section where the issue is discussed.
| Line | suggested |
| for | for | More info about the tag's inclusion.
| Unknown | optional |
| A different discussion page? | talkpage talk discuss discussion | The page where the dispute is discussed.
| Page name | optional |
| date | date | Date issue was raised.
| Date | optional |
See also
[ disputed ]
Usage
{{ Disputed inline|Talk page section|date=April 2024}}
To link to a centralized discussion on a page other than the article's
talk page, use the |talk= parameter (a.k.a. |talkpage=, |discuss=, |discussion=) to give the location:
{{ Disputed inline|talk=Talk:Topic#Talk page section|date=April 2024}}
The parameter |for= can be used to give a short reason that displays in the tag (do not use this for editorializing, or else any other editor may refactor such a comment out); the comment added here will be preceded by "for:" and the entire comment put in a round-bracketed parenthetical:
{{ Disputed inline|Talk page section|for=conflict with sources cited above|date=April 2024}}
{{ Disputed inline}} should not be used without also raising the issue on the talk page and, as a general practice, should remain in place while the talk page discussion is active.
Articles with disputed statements
This inline template helps highlight a particular disputed statement or alleged fact, in contrast to the {{ Disputed}} and {{ Disputed section}} templates which mark a whole article or section as disputed. This is particularly helpful when there are reliable sources supporting two or more different claims. {{ Disputed inline}} should not be used without also raising the issue on the talk page. When used on an article page, the word "disputed" links to Wikipedia:Disputed statement, and the article is placed in Category:Accuracy disputes or one of its dated sub-categories. This template is a more strongly worded version of {{ Dubious}}, which indicates a potential dispute, most often a question about reliable sourcing for the statement/fact at issue; {{ Disputed inline}} indicates that at least one editor believes there is no question that the statement has a verifiability problem.
Other pages
If this tag is used outside the article namespace, it will not be categorized in an article cleanup category, and the word "disputed" links to Wikipedia:Consensus. It can be used to indicate an unresolved dispute and a talk page topic about the dispute, e.g. an issue at a guideline or WikiProject page.
For pages other than articles, use {{ Under discussion inline}}, which categorizes differently.
TemplateData
TemplateData for Disputed inline
Inline template used to mark the content being disputed.
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talk page section | 1 | Talk page section where the issue is discussed.
| Line | suggested |
| for | for | More info about the tag's inclusion.
| Unknown | optional |
| A different discussion page? | talkpage talk discuss discussion | The page where the dispute is discussed.
| Page name | optional |
| date | date | Date issue was raised.
| Date | optional |
See also
| Attribution |
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clarity |
| ||||||||
| Miscellaneous |
| ||||||||
| Neutrality |
| ||||||||
| Precision |
| ||||||||
| Time-sensitivity |
| ||||||||
| Verifiability |
| ||||||||
| Wording |
| ||||||||
| General advice | |||||||||