This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
there's a pic of hanley here
http://www.pennilesspress.co.uk/ images/hanley2.bmp
But I don't know how to upload it to wikipedia —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
86.0.201.178 (
talk) 18:20, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
This doesn't link to a picture. Rwood128 ( talk) 20:56, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
I've added the banner because I now realize that editing -- done by me in the past -- does not conform to Wikipedian standards. Rwood128 ( talk) 13:11, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
@ Rwood128: Reviewing per WP:BIO request: Not far. Introduction (lead) is too short ( WP:LEAD) and there are some unreferenced paragraphs/sentences. Fix those, and it should be B-class. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:13, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Re the recent edits. Why "or nothing at all"? It is better, visually, to have a picture in the info box, and this image was the most relevant that I could find. Is this a Wikipedia rule? Even if it is, it seems too narrow (and worth ignoring). If this is just your personal view, please reconsider. Thanks. Rwood128 ( talk) 13:28, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
P. S. Burton, thanks for replying. I found an image here [1], in the public domain, presumably following the fair use criterion. The same image appears on at least one other site. However, I don't have the expertise to get the image onto Wikipedia – and I'm nervous about copyright, especially as I don't want to offend the copyright holder. I will, therefore, unfortunately, probably take the easy route and revert. Rwood128 ( talk) 19:59, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
I realise that this image is second best but Hanley is closely associated with Liverpool. And furthermore there is no outright ban, just custom and personal opinion. This image enhances the page visually. Perhaps one of the images that turn-up on Google might be used here? Would you, MB, be able to look into that? I do not have the knowledge to sort that out. Rwood128 ( talk) 15:20, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Several images appears with a Google search, which suggests they may be freely available. < https://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=https://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/files/2009/02/james-hanley.jpg&imgrefurl=https://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/james-hanley/&h=376&w=249&tbnid=PB83cXs1rVzcBM:&tbnh=160&tbnw=106&usg=__xsI19zrW6wrSGfOZ9kdFQoT_dic%3D&vet=1&docid=sW8-vfeKD0t2EM&itg=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiq-dC2xf7YAhUyTd8KHRoPCAwQ_B0IkQEwDQ> Rwood128 ( talk) 01:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
While it is good to see an image of Hanley, I suspect that there may be a copyright problem, because Hanley did not die in 1947 but 1985. Rwood128 ( talk) 09:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
there's a pic of hanley here
http://www.pennilesspress.co.uk/ images/hanley2.bmp
But I don't know how to upload it to wikipedia —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
86.0.201.178 (
talk) 18:20, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
This doesn't link to a picture. Rwood128 ( talk) 20:56, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
I've added the banner because I now realize that editing -- done by me in the past -- does not conform to Wikipedian standards. Rwood128 ( talk) 13:11, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
@ Rwood128: Reviewing per WP:BIO request: Not far. Introduction (lead) is too short ( WP:LEAD) and there are some unreferenced paragraphs/sentences. Fix those, and it should be B-class. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:13, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Re the recent edits. Why "or nothing at all"? It is better, visually, to have a picture in the info box, and this image was the most relevant that I could find. Is this a Wikipedia rule? Even if it is, it seems too narrow (and worth ignoring). If this is just your personal view, please reconsider. Thanks. Rwood128 ( talk) 13:28, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
P. S. Burton, thanks for replying. I found an image here [1], in the public domain, presumably following the fair use criterion. The same image appears on at least one other site. However, I don't have the expertise to get the image onto Wikipedia – and I'm nervous about copyright, especially as I don't want to offend the copyright holder. I will, therefore, unfortunately, probably take the easy route and revert. Rwood128 ( talk) 19:59, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
I realise that this image is second best but Hanley is closely associated with Liverpool. And furthermore there is no outright ban, just custom and personal opinion. This image enhances the page visually. Perhaps one of the images that turn-up on Google might be used here? Would you, MB, be able to look into that? I do not have the knowledge to sort that out. Rwood128 ( talk) 15:20, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Several images appears with a Google search, which suggests they may be freely available. < https://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=https://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/files/2009/02/james-hanley.jpg&imgrefurl=https://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/james-hanley/&h=376&w=249&tbnid=PB83cXs1rVzcBM:&tbnh=160&tbnw=106&usg=__xsI19zrW6wrSGfOZ9kdFQoT_dic%3D&vet=1&docid=sW8-vfeKD0t2EM&itg=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiq-dC2xf7YAhUyTd8KHRoPCAwQ_B0IkQEwDQ> Rwood128 ( talk) 01:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
While it is good to see an image of Hanley, I suspect that there may be a copyright problem, because Hanley did not die in 1947 but 1985. Rwood128 ( talk) 09:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)