![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Interesting to read ! -- Bhadani 16:53, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
The article repeatedly condemns Zia'a Islamic laws and expresses the author's point of view - that these laws have damaged Pakistan, etc.
While I don't think I actually disagree with the author's assessment, the article might be edited to make it more neutral?
I think it's fine. What good do you suggest came out by forcing the definition of Islam upon people? Some of the things that he did were nowhere near what Islam teaches and merely his own fantacies. Some of these odd biased and prejudiced laws are still in practice in Pakistan, and in clear violation of basic human rights, and the UN has tried many a times to get Pakistan to change them, but in vain. Islam is a universal religion and thus should be attractive to all the peoples of the world in its original form.
umair m
I also agree that this article is 100% fine. If the truth about Zia is hard to endure I guess you should read other articles.
24.90.163.84
It's irrelevant whether you agree with an opinion, really. There -is- a difference between fact and opinion and this needs to be made clear; NPOV is to be upheld even (especially?) when we're discussing the Holocaust or female genital cutting. I'm doing some gnomework to fix the more blatant examples.
Also: please remember to sign the talk page when you post. Ramidel 21:18, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Zia ul haq.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 3 November 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 15:15, 3 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hi NadirAli, you have been a series of unexplained edits to a whole bunch pages. What does this edit mean? What are you trying to do? -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 06:30, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello @ NadirAli: you have newly added an 'disputed accuracy' template at the top of the article without any explanation in the edit summary. Can you explain what factual accuracy is disputed in the article in its current state, and why? Regards, Tyler Durden ( talk) 21:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Tyler Durden, please check the above thread. I hesitate to edit the article for a short duration because of the dispute, but will update it very soon. Until then, I will have to insist that you leave it there. Thank you-- NadirAli نادر علی ( talk) 06:17, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq's Islamization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq's Islamization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.rationalistinternational.net/Shaikh/blasphemy_laws_in_pakistan.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:25, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (
talk)
11:05, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Interesting to read ! -- Bhadani 16:53, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
The article repeatedly condemns Zia'a Islamic laws and expresses the author's point of view - that these laws have damaged Pakistan, etc.
While I don't think I actually disagree with the author's assessment, the article might be edited to make it more neutral?
I think it's fine. What good do you suggest came out by forcing the definition of Islam upon people? Some of the things that he did were nowhere near what Islam teaches and merely his own fantacies. Some of these odd biased and prejudiced laws are still in practice in Pakistan, and in clear violation of basic human rights, and the UN has tried many a times to get Pakistan to change them, but in vain. Islam is a universal religion and thus should be attractive to all the peoples of the world in its original form.
umair m
I also agree that this article is 100% fine. If the truth about Zia is hard to endure I guess you should read other articles.
24.90.163.84
It's irrelevant whether you agree with an opinion, really. There -is- a difference between fact and opinion and this needs to be made clear; NPOV is to be upheld even (especially?) when we're discussing the Holocaust or female genital cutting. I'm doing some gnomework to fix the more blatant examples.
Also: please remember to sign the talk page when you post. Ramidel 21:18, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Zia ul haq.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 3 November 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 15:15, 3 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hi NadirAli, you have been a series of unexplained edits to a whole bunch pages. What does this edit mean? What are you trying to do? -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 06:30, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello @ NadirAli: you have newly added an 'disputed accuracy' template at the top of the article without any explanation in the edit summary. Can you explain what factual accuracy is disputed in the article in its current state, and why? Regards, Tyler Durden ( talk) 21:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Tyler Durden, please check the above thread. I hesitate to edit the article for a short duration because of the dispute, but will update it very soon. Until then, I will have to insist that you leave it there. Thank you-- NadirAli نادر علی ( talk) 06:17, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq's Islamization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq's Islamization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.rationalistinternational.net/Shaikh/blasphemy_laws_in_pakistan.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:25, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (
talk)
11:05, 1 May 2022 (UTC)