![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
![]() | This article was nominated for merging with G8 on March 2014. The result of the discussion was Do not merge. |
![]() Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 03:54, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 07:37, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: consensus to move. —usernamekiran (talk) 12:41, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Group of Seven → G7 – G7 is the WP:COMMONNAME of the subject. Per MOS:ACROTITLE, "Acronyms should be used in a page name if the subject is known primarily by its abbreviation and that abbreviation is primarily associated with the subject". This is the case here. PhotographyEdits ( talk) 10:47, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 04:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 09:52, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Group of Seven (artists) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 00:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
I have checked discussions in this and the G8 article, and I am unable to find the promised discussion on why or how it was decided not to merge them.
"G7" and "G8" do NOT refer to separate entities, they refer to a particular annual international forum, and there is no evidence that there ever were simultaneous, competing, G7 and G8 meetings. Allowing separate articles leads to confusion, and there is even a false and unsubstantiated claim that "they are two different entities" in the discussions: /info/en/?search=Talk:G8#Dealing_with_duplicate_contents_with_G7
I re-suggest the two articles be merged. This is not impossible, as the French Wiki has already done so https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupe_des_sept_(%C3%A9conomie) . I believe that "G7" would be the best name for a merged article, but the final chosen name is not very important, since Wikipedia can easily redirect the user. Agihard ( talk) 14:42, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Should the article be promoted to B-class? I believe it meets the criteria, anyone object? Lord serious pig 05:24, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
![]() | This article was nominated for merging with G8 on March 2014. The result of the discussion was Do not merge. |
![]() Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 03:54, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 07:37, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: consensus to move. —usernamekiran (talk) 12:41, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Group of Seven → G7 – G7 is the WP:COMMONNAME of the subject. Per MOS:ACROTITLE, "Acronyms should be used in a page name if the subject is known primarily by its abbreviation and that abbreviation is primarily associated with the subject". This is the case here. PhotographyEdits ( talk) 10:47, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 04:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 09:52, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Group of Seven (artists) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 00:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
I have checked discussions in this and the G8 article, and I am unable to find the promised discussion on why or how it was decided not to merge them.
"G7" and "G8" do NOT refer to separate entities, they refer to a particular annual international forum, and there is no evidence that there ever were simultaneous, competing, G7 and G8 meetings. Allowing separate articles leads to confusion, and there is even a false and unsubstantiated claim that "they are two different entities" in the discussions: /info/en/?search=Talk:G8#Dealing_with_duplicate_contents_with_G7
I re-suggest the two articles be merged. This is not impossible, as the French Wiki has already done so https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupe_des_sept_(%C3%A9conomie) . I believe that "G7" would be the best name for a merged article, but the final chosen name is not very important, since Wikipedia can easily redirect the user. Agihard ( talk) 14:42, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Should the article be promoted to B-class? I believe it meets the criteria, anyone object? Lord serious pig 05:24, 28 July 2024 (UTC)