![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I removed speculated link with Hungarian chronicler Anonymus as the two persons definitely did not live in the same time--Korovioff 18:23, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
"Anonymus might be of Mazon origin". What does Mazon mean in this context ?? -- Jotel 09:05, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Presumably it means Masovian lechitic tribe: ( /info/en/?search=Masovians). Which later becomes Masurian (NE Poland. /info/en/?search=Masuria) or Masovian ( /info/en/?search=Masovian_Voivodeship) -- Skywalker8 09:05, 16 July 2021 (EST)
TX Bibliography reviled by p. sava.com. What is 'TX'? ; 'Reviled'?? ; 'p.';?? ; 'sawa.com'?? That's Screen Advertising World Association's website... -- Jotel 09:49, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
As clericus de penna vivens ; cursus velox is also in accord with... ; if one finds an author using cursus spondiacus and simultaneously cursus velox ... ; Gallus Anonymous was Monachus Littorensis
Too many unexplained specialist terms (shown in italics here) --
Jotel
13:48, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia isn't for pushing non-mainstream theories as dominant ones. Additionally please use accepted language rather then Germanised versions.-- Molobo ( talk) 13:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Why is this name being restored and the tag removed without getting explained? "Gallus Anonymus" means "the Frenchman who lacks a name". The Polonization of this, Gall Anonim, isn't of any prima facie relevance to the article. Please explain the relevance before removing the tag. Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk) 12:42, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Is it correct English? Xx236 ( talk) 14:16, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
It's not obvious, that it was the same person. Xx236 ( talk) 14:24, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
So what? The article doesn't prove it's the same person. Any nation can have its own "Gallus Anonymus". Or is this article a disambiguation? Xx236 ( talk) 07:21, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Can somebody explain in more details - what monument, what nation? -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 12:27, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
The statue of the author of Gesta Hungarorum. He can be Gallus Anonymus, he can be someone other. Xx236 ( talk) 13:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
"Gallus is generally regarded as the first historian to have described Poland"
Wasn't Ibrahim ibn Jakub describing Poland earlier? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.184.206.121 ( talk) 07:58, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
No, Ibrahim Ibn Jacub did not describe Poland, because there was no Poland then, it only came into existence later. ( 71.137.206.26 ( talk) 23:28, 20 November 2011 (UTC))
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gallus Anonymus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:26, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I removed speculated link with Hungarian chronicler Anonymus as the two persons definitely did not live in the same time--Korovioff 18:23, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
"Anonymus might be of Mazon origin". What does Mazon mean in this context ?? -- Jotel 09:05, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Presumably it means Masovian lechitic tribe: ( /info/en/?search=Masovians). Which later becomes Masurian (NE Poland. /info/en/?search=Masuria) or Masovian ( /info/en/?search=Masovian_Voivodeship) -- Skywalker8 09:05, 16 July 2021 (EST)
TX Bibliography reviled by p. sava.com. What is 'TX'? ; 'Reviled'?? ; 'p.';?? ; 'sawa.com'?? That's Screen Advertising World Association's website... -- Jotel 09:49, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
As clericus de penna vivens ; cursus velox is also in accord with... ; if one finds an author using cursus spondiacus and simultaneously cursus velox ... ; Gallus Anonymous was Monachus Littorensis
Too many unexplained specialist terms (shown in italics here) --
Jotel
13:48, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia isn't for pushing non-mainstream theories as dominant ones. Additionally please use accepted language rather then Germanised versions.-- Molobo ( talk) 13:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Why is this name being restored and the tag removed without getting explained? "Gallus Anonymus" means "the Frenchman who lacks a name". The Polonization of this, Gall Anonim, isn't of any prima facie relevance to the article. Please explain the relevance before removing the tag. Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk) 12:42, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Is it correct English? Xx236 ( talk) 14:16, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
It's not obvious, that it was the same person. Xx236 ( talk) 14:24, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
So what? The article doesn't prove it's the same person. Any nation can have its own "Gallus Anonymus". Or is this article a disambiguation? Xx236 ( talk) 07:21, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Can somebody explain in more details - what monument, what nation? -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 12:27, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
The statue of the author of Gesta Hungarorum. He can be Gallus Anonymus, he can be someone other. Xx236 ( talk) 13:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
"Gallus is generally regarded as the first historian to have described Poland"
Wasn't Ibrahim ibn Jakub describing Poland earlier? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.184.206.121 ( talk) 07:58, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
No, Ibrahim Ibn Jacub did not describe Poland, because there was no Poland then, it only came into existence later. ( 71.137.206.26 ( talk) 23:28, 20 November 2011 (UTC))
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gallus Anonymus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:26, 25 December 2017 (UTC)