 | A fact from Foucauldian discourse analysis appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 27 February 2012 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2019 and 20 December 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Nicramirez1. Peer reviewers:
Maraa09,
Mariacrojas-pineda.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 21:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article does not address criticisms of Foucault, even the mild "hysterics" of Discipline and Punish (Geertz) to the usual judgment of analytic philosophers, "This is bullshit". Kiefer. Wolfowitz 14:55, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Feel free to add a section criticizing this theory. I did not see relevant material in my research, but I just skimmed the surface, enough to get a beyond-stub definition entry. --
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
talk to me 17:58, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Piotrus, Piotrus, Piotrus!
- Well, I don't nag friends about smoking ..., so I should have looked to see you as the initial author, and then I should have chosen my words ... even more diplomatically.
- Well, I have read my share of Foucault, when I was young and subject to the discipline and punishment of anthropology and sociology and philosophy professors! ;)
- Cheers,
Kiefer.
Wolfowitz 18:16, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Heh, discipline and punishment, very fitting :D I am not the biggest fan of F. on the bloc, but I was reading a paper using this theory, the theory was missing from Wikipedia and seems quite notable, so... -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 18:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
|
| A fact from Foucauldian discourse analysis appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 27 February 2012 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| |
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2019 and 20 December 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Nicramirez1. Peer reviewers:
Maraa09,
Mariacrojas-pineda.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 21:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article does not address criticisms of Foucault, even the mild "hysterics" of Discipline and Punish (Geertz) to the usual judgment of analytic philosophers, "This is bullshit". Kiefer. Wolfowitz 14:55, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Feel free to add a section criticizing this theory. I did not see relevant material in my research, but I just skimmed the surface, enough to get a beyond-stub definition entry. --
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
talk to me 17:58, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Piotrus, Piotrus, Piotrus!
- Well, I don't nag friends about smoking ..., so I should have looked to see you as the initial author, and then I should have chosen my words ... even more diplomatically.
- Well, I have read my share of Foucault, when I was young and subject to the discipline and punishment of anthropology and sociology and philosophy professors! ;)
- Cheers,
Kiefer.
Wolfowitz 18:16, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Heh, discipline and punishment, very fitting :D I am not the biggest fan of F. on the bloc, but I was reading a paper using this theory, the theory was missing from Wikipedia and seems quite notable, so... -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 18:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)