This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
A fad is also a cotton rubber for applying shellac. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
JohnGFFrancis (
talk •
contribs) 18:33, 17 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Deleting section "Difference between fads and trends"
The entire section appears to be, essentially, an essay, which the content thereof seems to have been made up by some person on a marketing strategy website that no longer exists. It has no place being in an encyclopedia.
Firejuggler86 (
talk) 04:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Indeed—it has no place in an encyclopedia, either. –
AndyFielding (
talk) 10:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
A fad is also a cotton rubber for applying shellac. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
JohnGFFrancis (
talk •
contribs) 18:33, 17 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Deleting section "Difference between fads and trends"
The entire section appears to be, essentially, an essay, which the content thereof seems to have been made up by some person on a marketing strategy website that no longer exists. It has no place being in an encyclopedia.
Firejuggler86 (
talk) 04:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Indeed—it has no place in an encyclopedia, either. –
AndyFielding (
talk) 10:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply