FLCL has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for FLCL: "Rception section" has been retitled "Critical reception in America" to better reflect the content of the section; all claims are now sourced. |
-- Gwern (contribs) 19:13 14 December 2009 (GMT)
From FUNime 2002's interview with Tsurumaki:
Why was FLCL produced?
Gainax needed to work on something new after Evangelion, but Hideaki Anno needed a little rest, so I came up with the idea for FLCL.
Where does the title for FLCL come from?
There is a japanese rock group which has an album called "Fool Cool". I thought that title would be suited for an anime. (That later became "Furi Kuri" > FLCL) That was also kept in the last OVA episode where Mamimi wins the photo competetion.
Is the scooter in front of the Gainax shop really the vehicle from the FLCL ending?
Yes, it's the Vespa from the ending, and it's mine. Alas, it cannot fly.
Original: http://www.tomodachi.de/html/archiv/funime/f27_kurz_1.html Translation: http://forum.evageeks.org/viewtopic.php?p=454429#454429 -- Gwern (contribs) 23:46 15 May 2011 (GMT)
AQ What does FLCL mean? Mr. Yamaga FLCL was originally designed by Mr. Enokido and the director, Mr. Tsurumaki. They came up with it themselves. Even within the series, the question of what exactly is FLCL is thrown out there.. Mr. Akai In fact, I asked the director, "What exactly does FLCL mean?" and the director said, "I don't really know." Mr. Yamaga When you abbreviate longer words in Japanese, you take the first couple of syllables of each word and connect them up.. It seems like the younger generation has been doing that with absolutely everything. He wanted to give the aesthetic of a longer title that had been shortened but in reality there is no longer title. Audience So feel free to make one up. Mr. Yamaga Since the title doesn't really describe anything. It was very hard for the advertisers and distributors to say, "No, we don't want to do that." because they weren't exactly sure what it meant. {Laugther} It is really hard to argue with something when you don't know what is going on. Mr. Akai In fact, when the studio was younger, since they were biting everything that moved, it seemed that they stranger they were, the less likely that they were going to be opposed. They [the sponsors] just saw it as, "Oh, good old Gainax, saying those weird things again." They didn't really want to deal with it so they just let Gainax say whatever they wanted. AQ How did the creators present FLCL for approval? Mr. Yamaga Since King Records made a lot of money on Evangelion, the connection between King Records and Gainax was pretty much, "Oh, it's Gainax, we'll probably make some money on it", and they let just let it through [the approval process]. Since it was a direct to video release, there was less controversy over content because it was direct to video. AQ How did Mr. Tsurumaki present it to Gainax? Mr. Yamaga Since Mr. Anno didn't really want to do animation after Evangelion, his 'kohai' (understudy) was supposed to make an animation series, but seemed to take a while to come up with a concept. So when he did finally come up with one, it was like, "Okay, that sounds good."
http://web.archive.org/web/20040101025405/http://www.anime-tourist.com/article.php?sid=299 -- Gwern (contribs) 22:40 13 August 2011 (GMT)
I am going to revert the edit because it seems to me that the information that was deleted is germane to that section. Maybe I'm wrong; but let's at least have a discussion about it first before we decide to delete, shall we? (especially when the information is cited)<br. /> --NBahn ( talk) 05:23, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
The section on the music seems a bit misleading. None of the episodes really have opening themes; the ones mentioned as such essentially function as insert songs (and some, like "Carnival" and "Runner's High," are used multiple times at different points in other episodes). It certainly does have an ending theme in "Ride on Shooting Star," but I don't even know that I'd call "Advice" a "battle theme" -- it usually does signify an action sequence (you could call it the "uh-oh" theme), but...
So that designation is iffy. And "Little Busters" is even more tenuous; the main thing is that it's always the last song to be played before the ending credits. Twice it starts when Canti eats Naota, four times it only starts after the action's all over.
Definitely looks to me like some cleanup is in order. -- Shay Guy ( talk) 01:19, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
I was reading the article, and it says currently that Haruko has a "Rickenbacker 4001 right-handed reverse strung electric bass guitar" in the series. While it IS indeed a 4001, it is clearly a left-handed model, rather than a right handed one strung in reverse; this is evidenced by the fact that the longer horn is on the left hand side of the body (from a front view). [1] is a good example picture from the anime; Comparing this to a right handed 4001 will prove once again that it is in fact a left handed 4001. [2]
Didn't want to edit the article out of the blue, will either leave that to someone else or wait for someone else's approval first.
-- Pogs ( talk) 03:14, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Y'all may find this reference useful: http://web.archive.org/web/20010706135824/http://j-pop.com/anime/news/top10.html
It gives top-10 sales rankings of anime in the US & Japan. This is included in the list. -- Gwern (contribs) 01:30 26 January 2010 (GMT)
Shouldn't it be mention that Haruko's Vespa is referred to as the "Cosmic Scooter"? Sarujo ( talk) 00:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
what is the literal translation of the title, "furi kuri"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.188.155.226 ( talk) 08:01, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
A friend has all six episodes on a single DVD. It's a replicated disc, dual layer, not a DVD-R. Bootleg? Bizzybody ( talk) 03:13, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Sorry for the no sign, but yes, it is obviously a bootleg version.
The only way to have all 6 episodes is to buy them one at a time, or get the collection..
which has all 6 cases, not all combined into one. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.97.206.59 (
talk) 21:50, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Not really, FLCL has been officially re-released all on one disc 72.89.142.185 ( talk) 17:27, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
-- KrebMarkt ( talk) 15:39, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Apart from the Vespa Piaggio motorbike, which should pretty much make everyone get an hint of Italy, FLCL is pronounced furikuri furikurà and sounds like a blatant reference to an italian popular song, Funiculì, Funiculà.
That's a song that's supposed to talk about the opening of a funicular cable car in Naples, but actually goes on and on repeating:
This song in most of Italy is seen as an anthem for Naples and its verses are used in all of it to refer to the humorous, gaggy, theatrical, and slapstick way of conducting business and going trough life of neapolitan people.
It's also a very good metaphore for that anime as a whole.
Zingus J. Rinkle ( talk) 02:02, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
In addition to it's rather obvious nod to NGE, there is a set piece based on Lupin references, eyebrow references that made me think immediately of Cobra, etc. Somebody needs to start a 'sources' section and explore this angle a bit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 ( talk) 21:20, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
That's original research. We can only add what we can verify through reliable sources. Bread Ninja ( talk) 22:31, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Greetings! Recently I ran a search for FLCL on ebay and found the following book "Flcl: List of Flcl Characters, List of Flcl Episodes, D" by Books LLC. I was very excited because anything FLCL by Gainax or the Pillows has my undivided attention, but as I got ready to bid I realised this was not a new book or a doujinshi, but rather a copy-paste job from the FLCL entry in wikipedia. I mean, they did not even bother to give it a title! Its the table of contents from the article! It even says "Souce: Wikipedia" and the excerpi in the description is the entire music section from the same entry. Naturaly, I reported it to ebay as infringing on copyrighted material and as a listing violation as compilation media.
I am not sure if the ad expired or Ebay took down the listing, but it was gone for a while and everything was good in the world, until the seller relisted the item again. I report it anew, it goes away then comes back a few days later.
My question is, should I do this? Although I do not own the copyright to the original work and my contributions to this article are little I feel it is not right for a book mill/content farm to rip on two things that I hold dear, FLCL and wikipedia. Can Books LLC print entire enciclopedic articles from wikipedia and sell them online? Is this a widespread problem?
Here's the particulars:
Ebay Item number 180786879511 (to change soon if my report goes through)
Title "Flcl: List of Flcl Characters, List of Flcl Episodes, Discography of FLCL"
Author Books LLC
Language: English
Format: Paperback
ISBN-10: 1156344808
ISBN-13: 9781156344804
Length: 28 pages
Thickness: 0.2 in
Weight: 2.4 oz
Please let me know if Books LLC is within its right or how you would have handled a similar problem. Mighty Ozymandias ( talk) 18:28, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
theres alot of confusion about the name FLCL. ive seen decades ago a couple of these, but always asumed it whas 'vespa girl' and manny like me, took me decades to actualy trackdown this serries (by catching writer's name on titles on a mange fan stream), i sugest adding this 'keyword'- 'vespa girl' if techical posible, not an od sugestion if you consider this whas orginaly in a difrent language and FLCL makes lil sense and hard to remeber. it would make this article/serries more accesable for all. im a wiki inliterate so ill leave this all upto peeple more understanding of it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.85.94.241 ( talk • contribs) 05:59, February 6, 2012
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I think List of FLCL episodes should be merged here. With only six episodes, there's no valid reason to create a spin off article and this article would benefit enormously from the decent content that the list covers. The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:44, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Normally, we would use the cover of the first manga volume or anime DVD in the infobox. But in this case given the monochrome covers of the original DVDs, I can understand why an exception would be made. However, there is one problem and that has to do with the identification of the image. Right now, we don't know where the image originated from, which weakens its fair-use case. Is it production art, did it come from a DVD insert, promotional image, or etc? If it cannot be identified, I would suggest replacing it with one that is part of the insert for the North American Blu-ray release. ( Sixth image over) It features the same characters, but we can identify what the image is. — Farix ( t | c) 01:58, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Are there any Good articles using Amazon? -- George Ho ( talk) 23:34, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
The only episode that did not have serious moments was episode five. Should adding this be considered? You may also want to consider Slice of life as a genre. -- Toonipedia ( talk) 16:17, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
I agree, but it does at least TRY to be seroious (it doesn't pull it off well, in my opinion). If it says comedy-drama on a reliable source, it should say comedy-drama. -- Toonipedia ( talk) 12:22, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
It's redundant to have two tags relating to humour/comedy. If you want to add drama alone that makes sense, but comedy-drama itself is a useless addition. The genres as "Science fiction, Surreal humour" alone are more than adequate for description and account for the broad view of critical review. 2607:8400:2802:10:250:56FF:FEAB:339C ( talk) 22:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on FLCL. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:29, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Is it really necessary to list the novel releases in the form of a table? In my humble opinion, it makes the article hard to look at with that large gap of space. Wouldn't it be better to just summarize it in text?
SIDENOTE: Once reviews start pouring in, would it be a good idea to split FLCL Alternative and FLCL Progressive onto a single article? Although they are confirmed to being second/third seasons, they seem detached from the original. i dont know how to phrase it. But basically i'm considering it a "reboot" (sort of, not really). If someone could help me out with the words. Blue Pumpkin Pie ( talk) 11:55, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
https://ask.fm/Clarknova/answers/150639396841?utm_source=tw_share_own_ar&shareBy=Clarknova&utm_campaign=ui_v3#_=_ Knowing this, I think the article needs to be reworked a bit to establish that Alternative is a “loose prequel” and not a sequel. 24.228.215.81 ( talk) 08:41, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
FLCL has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for FLCL: "Rception section" has been retitled "Critical reception in America" to better reflect the content of the section; all claims are now sourced. |
-- Gwern (contribs) 19:13 14 December 2009 (GMT)
From FUNime 2002's interview with Tsurumaki:
Why was FLCL produced?
Gainax needed to work on something new after Evangelion, but Hideaki Anno needed a little rest, so I came up with the idea for FLCL.
Where does the title for FLCL come from?
There is a japanese rock group which has an album called "Fool Cool". I thought that title would be suited for an anime. (That later became "Furi Kuri" > FLCL) That was also kept in the last OVA episode where Mamimi wins the photo competetion.
Is the scooter in front of the Gainax shop really the vehicle from the FLCL ending?
Yes, it's the Vespa from the ending, and it's mine. Alas, it cannot fly.
Original: http://www.tomodachi.de/html/archiv/funime/f27_kurz_1.html Translation: http://forum.evageeks.org/viewtopic.php?p=454429#454429 -- Gwern (contribs) 23:46 15 May 2011 (GMT)
AQ What does FLCL mean? Mr. Yamaga FLCL was originally designed by Mr. Enokido and the director, Mr. Tsurumaki. They came up with it themselves. Even within the series, the question of what exactly is FLCL is thrown out there.. Mr. Akai In fact, I asked the director, "What exactly does FLCL mean?" and the director said, "I don't really know." Mr. Yamaga When you abbreviate longer words in Japanese, you take the first couple of syllables of each word and connect them up.. It seems like the younger generation has been doing that with absolutely everything. He wanted to give the aesthetic of a longer title that had been shortened but in reality there is no longer title. Audience So feel free to make one up. Mr. Yamaga Since the title doesn't really describe anything. It was very hard for the advertisers and distributors to say, "No, we don't want to do that." because they weren't exactly sure what it meant. {Laugther} It is really hard to argue with something when you don't know what is going on. Mr. Akai In fact, when the studio was younger, since they were biting everything that moved, it seemed that they stranger they were, the less likely that they were going to be opposed. They [the sponsors] just saw it as, "Oh, good old Gainax, saying those weird things again." They didn't really want to deal with it so they just let Gainax say whatever they wanted. AQ How did the creators present FLCL for approval? Mr. Yamaga Since King Records made a lot of money on Evangelion, the connection between King Records and Gainax was pretty much, "Oh, it's Gainax, we'll probably make some money on it", and they let just let it through [the approval process]. Since it was a direct to video release, there was less controversy over content because it was direct to video. AQ How did Mr. Tsurumaki present it to Gainax? Mr. Yamaga Since Mr. Anno didn't really want to do animation after Evangelion, his 'kohai' (understudy) was supposed to make an animation series, but seemed to take a while to come up with a concept. So when he did finally come up with one, it was like, "Okay, that sounds good."
http://web.archive.org/web/20040101025405/http://www.anime-tourist.com/article.php?sid=299 -- Gwern (contribs) 22:40 13 August 2011 (GMT)
I am going to revert the edit because it seems to me that the information that was deleted is germane to that section. Maybe I'm wrong; but let's at least have a discussion about it first before we decide to delete, shall we? (especially when the information is cited)<br. /> --NBahn ( talk) 05:23, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
The section on the music seems a bit misleading. None of the episodes really have opening themes; the ones mentioned as such essentially function as insert songs (and some, like "Carnival" and "Runner's High," are used multiple times at different points in other episodes). It certainly does have an ending theme in "Ride on Shooting Star," but I don't even know that I'd call "Advice" a "battle theme" -- it usually does signify an action sequence (you could call it the "uh-oh" theme), but...
So that designation is iffy. And "Little Busters" is even more tenuous; the main thing is that it's always the last song to be played before the ending credits. Twice it starts when Canti eats Naota, four times it only starts after the action's all over.
Definitely looks to me like some cleanup is in order. -- Shay Guy ( talk) 01:19, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
I was reading the article, and it says currently that Haruko has a "Rickenbacker 4001 right-handed reverse strung electric bass guitar" in the series. While it IS indeed a 4001, it is clearly a left-handed model, rather than a right handed one strung in reverse; this is evidenced by the fact that the longer horn is on the left hand side of the body (from a front view). [1] is a good example picture from the anime; Comparing this to a right handed 4001 will prove once again that it is in fact a left handed 4001. [2]
Didn't want to edit the article out of the blue, will either leave that to someone else or wait for someone else's approval first.
-- Pogs ( talk) 03:14, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Y'all may find this reference useful: http://web.archive.org/web/20010706135824/http://j-pop.com/anime/news/top10.html
It gives top-10 sales rankings of anime in the US & Japan. This is included in the list. -- Gwern (contribs) 01:30 26 January 2010 (GMT)
Shouldn't it be mention that Haruko's Vespa is referred to as the "Cosmic Scooter"? Sarujo ( talk) 00:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
what is the literal translation of the title, "furi kuri"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.188.155.226 ( talk) 08:01, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
A friend has all six episodes on a single DVD. It's a replicated disc, dual layer, not a DVD-R. Bootleg? Bizzybody ( talk) 03:13, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Sorry for the no sign, but yes, it is obviously a bootleg version.
The only way to have all 6 episodes is to buy them one at a time, or get the collection..
which has all 6 cases, not all combined into one. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.97.206.59 (
talk) 21:50, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Not really, FLCL has been officially re-released all on one disc 72.89.142.185 ( talk) 17:27, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
-- KrebMarkt ( talk) 15:39, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Apart from the Vespa Piaggio motorbike, which should pretty much make everyone get an hint of Italy, FLCL is pronounced furikuri furikurà and sounds like a blatant reference to an italian popular song, Funiculì, Funiculà.
That's a song that's supposed to talk about the opening of a funicular cable car in Naples, but actually goes on and on repeating:
This song in most of Italy is seen as an anthem for Naples and its verses are used in all of it to refer to the humorous, gaggy, theatrical, and slapstick way of conducting business and going trough life of neapolitan people.
It's also a very good metaphore for that anime as a whole.
Zingus J. Rinkle ( talk) 02:02, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
In addition to it's rather obvious nod to NGE, there is a set piece based on Lupin references, eyebrow references that made me think immediately of Cobra, etc. Somebody needs to start a 'sources' section and explore this angle a bit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 ( talk) 21:20, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
That's original research. We can only add what we can verify through reliable sources. Bread Ninja ( talk) 22:31, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Greetings! Recently I ran a search for FLCL on ebay and found the following book "Flcl: List of Flcl Characters, List of Flcl Episodes, D" by Books LLC. I was very excited because anything FLCL by Gainax or the Pillows has my undivided attention, but as I got ready to bid I realised this was not a new book or a doujinshi, but rather a copy-paste job from the FLCL entry in wikipedia. I mean, they did not even bother to give it a title! Its the table of contents from the article! It even says "Souce: Wikipedia" and the excerpi in the description is the entire music section from the same entry. Naturaly, I reported it to ebay as infringing on copyrighted material and as a listing violation as compilation media.
I am not sure if the ad expired or Ebay took down the listing, but it was gone for a while and everything was good in the world, until the seller relisted the item again. I report it anew, it goes away then comes back a few days later.
My question is, should I do this? Although I do not own the copyright to the original work and my contributions to this article are little I feel it is not right for a book mill/content farm to rip on two things that I hold dear, FLCL and wikipedia. Can Books LLC print entire enciclopedic articles from wikipedia and sell them online? Is this a widespread problem?
Here's the particulars:
Ebay Item number 180786879511 (to change soon if my report goes through)
Title "Flcl: List of Flcl Characters, List of Flcl Episodes, Discography of FLCL"
Author Books LLC
Language: English
Format: Paperback
ISBN-10: 1156344808
ISBN-13: 9781156344804
Length: 28 pages
Thickness: 0.2 in
Weight: 2.4 oz
Please let me know if Books LLC is within its right or how you would have handled a similar problem. Mighty Ozymandias ( talk) 18:28, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
theres alot of confusion about the name FLCL. ive seen decades ago a couple of these, but always asumed it whas 'vespa girl' and manny like me, took me decades to actualy trackdown this serries (by catching writer's name on titles on a mange fan stream), i sugest adding this 'keyword'- 'vespa girl' if techical posible, not an od sugestion if you consider this whas orginaly in a difrent language and FLCL makes lil sense and hard to remeber. it would make this article/serries more accesable for all. im a wiki inliterate so ill leave this all upto peeple more understanding of it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.85.94.241 ( talk • contribs) 05:59, February 6, 2012
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I think List of FLCL episodes should be merged here. With only six episodes, there's no valid reason to create a spin off article and this article would benefit enormously from the decent content that the list covers. The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:44, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Normally, we would use the cover of the first manga volume or anime DVD in the infobox. But in this case given the monochrome covers of the original DVDs, I can understand why an exception would be made. However, there is one problem and that has to do with the identification of the image. Right now, we don't know where the image originated from, which weakens its fair-use case. Is it production art, did it come from a DVD insert, promotional image, or etc? If it cannot be identified, I would suggest replacing it with one that is part of the insert for the North American Blu-ray release. ( Sixth image over) It features the same characters, but we can identify what the image is. — Farix ( t | c) 01:58, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Are there any Good articles using Amazon? -- George Ho ( talk) 23:34, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
The only episode that did not have serious moments was episode five. Should adding this be considered? You may also want to consider Slice of life as a genre. -- Toonipedia ( talk) 16:17, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
I agree, but it does at least TRY to be seroious (it doesn't pull it off well, in my opinion). If it says comedy-drama on a reliable source, it should say comedy-drama. -- Toonipedia ( talk) 12:22, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
It's redundant to have two tags relating to humour/comedy. If you want to add drama alone that makes sense, but comedy-drama itself is a useless addition. The genres as "Science fiction, Surreal humour" alone are more than adequate for description and account for the broad view of critical review. 2607:8400:2802:10:250:56FF:FEAB:339C ( talk) 22:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on FLCL. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:29, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Is it really necessary to list the novel releases in the form of a table? In my humble opinion, it makes the article hard to look at with that large gap of space. Wouldn't it be better to just summarize it in text?
SIDENOTE: Once reviews start pouring in, would it be a good idea to split FLCL Alternative and FLCL Progressive onto a single article? Although they are confirmed to being second/third seasons, they seem detached from the original. i dont know how to phrase it. But basically i'm considering it a "reboot" (sort of, not really). If someone could help me out with the words. Blue Pumpkin Pie ( talk) 11:55, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
https://ask.fm/Clarknova/answers/150639396841?utm_source=tw_share_own_ar&shareBy=Clarknova&utm_campaign=ui_v3#_=_ Knowing this, I think the article needs to be reworked a bit to establish that Alternative is a “loose prequel” and not a sequel. 24.228.215.81 ( talk) 08:41, 22 October 2018 (UTC)