![]() | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Change: Bunny from Lexx is not a rabbit. -- cruentus 10:03, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
This page seems to be morphing from disambiguation into an article, except an article about what? Does anyone object to turning back into a proper disambiguation page? maxsch ( talk) 03:49, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
To the editor Baseball Bugs, there is no primary meaning here, read MoS:DP#Linking to a primary topic. Also, I formatted the Wiktionary box and Sailor Moon reference just fine the first time. And to the editor Propaniac, MoS:DP#Categories says that the inclusion of Category:Given names and Category:Surnames, as well their subcats, are OK. Thoughts? Any concerns should be discussed here. Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 02:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
I've taken the liberty to do it for you [2]. Now I was thinking we could use a redirect for the first entry. Here's what I found:
Sorry, but I'm just going to respond to the several comments that have been directed at me or my edits in one lump here, since I'm just now seeing all of them:
There may be a "See also" section which can include:
- Terms which can be confused with Title, for example New Market and Newmarket
- Likely misspellings of Title, for example Belmont, Belmonte and Bellmont
- Different forms of Title, for example Splitting, Split (disambiguation), and Splitter
I don't see how Bugs Bunny and Lola Bunny fall under any of those categories. A disambig page is emphatically not a list of phrases that happen to contain the word being disambiguated, per WP:DISAMBIGUATION#Lists (and I don't know why User:Baseball Bugs responded to me to say that there's nothing in the MOS:DP called "Lists", since that's not where I was linking). The point of the dab page is that there are at least two articles that could be referred to as "PHRASE" so when the user types "PHRASE" into a search engine, the wiki can't be sure which article they're looking for. Somehow, I think even if a user did type in "Bunny" to find "Bugs Bunny", if Bugs weren't on the page they could figure out how to find the Bugs Bunny article.
That being said, I really am not that bothered by including Bugs and Lola; I just think it's going to be an invitation to other users who see that to add any other "Bunny" they can think of and then the page becomes too cluttered and messy to be easily used for its actual purpose, which is why cleanup becomes necessary in the first place.
![]() | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Change: Bunny from Lexx is not a rabbit. -- cruentus 10:03, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
This page seems to be morphing from disambiguation into an article, except an article about what? Does anyone object to turning back into a proper disambiguation page? maxsch ( talk) 03:49, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
To the editor Baseball Bugs, there is no primary meaning here, read MoS:DP#Linking to a primary topic. Also, I formatted the Wiktionary box and Sailor Moon reference just fine the first time. And to the editor Propaniac, MoS:DP#Categories says that the inclusion of Category:Given names and Category:Surnames, as well their subcats, are OK. Thoughts? Any concerns should be discussed here. Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 02:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
I've taken the liberty to do it for you [2]. Now I was thinking we could use a redirect for the first entry. Here's what I found:
Sorry, but I'm just going to respond to the several comments that have been directed at me or my edits in one lump here, since I'm just now seeing all of them:
There may be a "See also" section which can include:
- Terms which can be confused with Title, for example New Market and Newmarket
- Likely misspellings of Title, for example Belmont, Belmonte and Bellmont
- Different forms of Title, for example Splitting, Split (disambiguation), and Splitter
I don't see how Bugs Bunny and Lola Bunny fall under any of those categories. A disambig page is emphatically not a list of phrases that happen to contain the word being disambiguated, per WP:DISAMBIGUATION#Lists (and I don't know why User:Baseball Bugs responded to me to say that there's nothing in the MOS:DP called "Lists", since that's not where I was linking). The point of the dab page is that there are at least two articles that could be referred to as "PHRASE" so when the user types "PHRASE" into a search engine, the wiki can't be sure which article they're looking for. Somehow, I think even if a user did type in "Bunny" to find "Bugs Bunny", if Bugs weren't on the page they could figure out how to find the Bugs Bunny article.
That being said, I really am not that bothered by including Bugs and Lola; I just think it's going to be an invitation to other users who see that to add any other "Bunny" they can think of and then the page becomes too cluttered and messy to be easily used for its actual purpose, which is why cleanup becomes necessary in the first place.