![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 7, 2008, September 7, 2009, September 7, 2010, September 7, 2013, September 7, 2019, and September 7, 2023. |
I wonder if the name "Boxer Protocol" is more popular than the "Treaty of 1901". If so, should we move the title to Boxer Protocol? Mababa
Where is Lang-fang 郎坊? Could this be the historical name to Langfang 廊坊? Benjwong 01:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
The treaty conditions concerning the navigability of Peiho and Whangpoo rivers should be mentioned. Also I'd be interested to know how the edicts posted about membership of anti-foreign societies were "enumerating the punishments inflicted on the guilty"? Lastly was the 5% tariff paid to the Chinese as import duty (my skim reading suggested this) or was it a tax by the other signatories?
Perhaps mention the San Francisco Peace Treaty as it overrode the Xinchou Treaty (1901). Pbhj ( talk) 12:25, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Remittance Hi, I added a notice about the remittance of 98% of the indenmity. I will provide a reference source (a book which I think is available in electronic form for quick browsing) in due course. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.40.136.163 ( talk) 15:47, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I was thinking about deleting the remittance section, but I finally found what seems to be a reputable source verifying the 98% figure. Erik-the-red ( talk) 23:08, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
One of these two statements is false or inaccurate:
Mazarin07 ( talk) 21:40, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Money was not repaid, only the conditions revoked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.10.132.211 ( talk) 02:18, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
I propose that Imperial Decree on events leading up to the signing of the Boxer Protocol be merged into Boxer Protocol. This (lengthily named) article deals with the events leading up to the Boxer Protocol, and INTENSELY overlaps Boxer Protocol. It is an excellent contribution and most of the text should live on, but it's a fork, it needs to join its parent! People looking for this good info about the Qing dynasty leading up to the crisis will never find it in this fledgling (recently brought up from stub status) article out in the wilderness hidden behind this weirdly long and unwieldy article title (a fork symptom). Please join me integrating and merging. NickDupree ( talk) 06:36, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
The (lengthily named) Imperial Decree on events leading up to the signing of the Boxer Protocol article deals with the events leading up to the Boxer Protocol, and INTENSELY overlaps Boxer Protocol. In terms of topic overlap, you seldom find a better example. It is an excellent contribution and most of the text should live on, but it's a fork, it needs to join its parent! People looking for this good info about the Qing dynasty leading up to the crisis will never find it in this fledgling (recently brought up from stub status) article out in the wilderness hidden behind this weirdly long and unwieldy article title (a fork symptom). NickDupree ( talk) 01:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Tong Tekong, scholar, historian and university lecturer, Hou Yijie, scholar, historian and writer of university text books, Wang Shuzhen, history books writer, and Jin Manluo, and their books cover 10 to 70 years of Manchu Empire history, and yet, none of their books were being cited in all the Boxer Protocol related articles. Put it this way, their books cover many important historical topics, and Yihetuan is just part of them. Discussion is open now. Arilang talk 03:26, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Influence of dong fuxiang and his muslim army on the boxer protocol sparing his life- his army surrounded xi'an while the imperial government was in session there-
Seyeednu ( talk) 06:44, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
I marked this dubious as it is much more than the original. Plus many of these debts were forgiven. If true needs explanation. Tuntable ( talk) 02:21, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Boxer Protocol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:31, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 7, 2008, September 7, 2009, September 7, 2010, September 7, 2013, September 7, 2019, and September 7, 2023. |
I wonder if the name "Boxer Protocol" is more popular than the "Treaty of 1901". If so, should we move the title to Boxer Protocol? Mababa
Where is Lang-fang 郎坊? Could this be the historical name to Langfang 廊坊? Benjwong 01:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
The treaty conditions concerning the navigability of Peiho and Whangpoo rivers should be mentioned. Also I'd be interested to know how the edicts posted about membership of anti-foreign societies were "enumerating the punishments inflicted on the guilty"? Lastly was the 5% tariff paid to the Chinese as import duty (my skim reading suggested this) or was it a tax by the other signatories?
Perhaps mention the San Francisco Peace Treaty as it overrode the Xinchou Treaty (1901). Pbhj ( talk) 12:25, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Remittance Hi, I added a notice about the remittance of 98% of the indenmity. I will provide a reference source (a book which I think is available in electronic form for quick browsing) in due course. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.40.136.163 ( talk) 15:47, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I was thinking about deleting the remittance section, but I finally found what seems to be a reputable source verifying the 98% figure. Erik-the-red ( talk) 23:08, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
One of these two statements is false or inaccurate:
Mazarin07 ( talk) 21:40, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Money was not repaid, only the conditions revoked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.10.132.211 ( talk) 02:18, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
I propose that Imperial Decree on events leading up to the signing of the Boxer Protocol be merged into Boxer Protocol. This (lengthily named) article deals with the events leading up to the Boxer Protocol, and INTENSELY overlaps Boxer Protocol. It is an excellent contribution and most of the text should live on, but it's a fork, it needs to join its parent! People looking for this good info about the Qing dynasty leading up to the crisis will never find it in this fledgling (recently brought up from stub status) article out in the wilderness hidden behind this weirdly long and unwieldy article title (a fork symptom). Please join me integrating and merging. NickDupree ( talk) 06:36, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
The (lengthily named) Imperial Decree on events leading up to the signing of the Boxer Protocol article deals with the events leading up to the Boxer Protocol, and INTENSELY overlaps Boxer Protocol. In terms of topic overlap, you seldom find a better example. It is an excellent contribution and most of the text should live on, but it's a fork, it needs to join its parent! People looking for this good info about the Qing dynasty leading up to the crisis will never find it in this fledgling (recently brought up from stub status) article out in the wilderness hidden behind this weirdly long and unwieldy article title (a fork symptom). NickDupree ( talk) 01:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Tong Tekong, scholar, historian and university lecturer, Hou Yijie, scholar, historian and writer of university text books, Wang Shuzhen, history books writer, and Jin Manluo, and their books cover 10 to 70 years of Manchu Empire history, and yet, none of their books were being cited in all the Boxer Protocol related articles. Put it this way, their books cover many important historical topics, and Yihetuan is just part of them. Discussion is open now. Arilang talk 03:26, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Influence of dong fuxiang and his muslim army on the boxer protocol sparing his life- his army surrounded xi'an while the imperial government was in session there-
Seyeednu ( talk) 06:44, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
I marked this dubious as it is much more than the original. Plus many of these debts were forgiven. If true needs explanation. Tuntable ( talk) 02:21, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Boxer Protocol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:31, 24 July 2017 (UTC)