![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:Black Rain (1989 American film) poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 05:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I liked this film a great deal. In particular, I found the 'You made the rain black' scene, in which Sugai describes his motivation for the counterfeiting operation to Nick, especially chilling. And an eye-opener.
But I've encountered a fascinating excoriation of implicit cultural bigotry in the film that I think deserves to be included in the main entry, as a 'Criticism' section, perhaps.
Here's a precis I've extracted so far:
I think I've rendered the author's ideas reasonably accurately. And, frankly, I can't argue with them.
Should this go in? -- Cdavis999 ( talk) 07:17, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Black Rain (film) was moved to Black Rain (American film) per discussion here. Since both films were released in 1989, we decided to use common sense and disambiguate the films by nationality instead of by the release year. However, if another film called Black Rain comes out in the future, we would need to have Black Rain (1989 American film) and Black Rain (1989 Japanese film). Erik ( talk) 12:33, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
All that is written is "The movie was met with a mostly positive reception." The movie has a 57% fresh rating on RT. Think this needs to be corrected/expanded. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.13.80.114 ( talk) 17:53, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Mostly positive is a bs statement i checked the references one was a roger ebert review where he gave it 2 stars thats not a good review. that 50% or an F- if this was a grade in school.
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:Black Rain (1989 American film) poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 05:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I liked this film a great deal. In particular, I found the 'You made the rain black' scene, in which Sugai describes his motivation for the counterfeiting operation to Nick, especially chilling. And an eye-opener.
But I've encountered a fascinating excoriation of implicit cultural bigotry in the film that I think deserves to be included in the main entry, as a 'Criticism' section, perhaps.
Here's a precis I've extracted so far:
I think I've rendered the author's ideas reasonably accurately. And, frankly, I can't argue with them.
Should this go in? -- Cdavis999 ( talk) 07:17, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Black Rain (film) was moved to Black Rain (American film) per discussion here. Since both films were released in 1989, we decided to use common sense and disambiguate the films by nationality instead of by the release year. However, if another film called Black Rain comes out in the future, we would need to have Black Rain (1989 American film) and Black Rain (1989 Japanese film). Erik ( talk) 12:33, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
All that is written is "The movie was met with a mostly positive reception." The movie has a 57% fresh rating on RT. Think this needs to be corrected/expanded. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.13.80.114 ( talk) 17:53, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Mostly positive is a bs statement i checked the references one was a roger ebert review where he gave it 2 stars thats not a good review. that 50% or an F- if this was a grade in school.