![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2019, when it received 11,776,149 views. |
Some questions first:
Previous criteria seems to be more along the lines, that movies in this list were the ones, that were shown in cinemas worldwide. Not all of them were in English, but hey - this page was not about ALL movies. Not all of them are so important, that everyone should know about them. 195.147.206.144 ( talk) 09:05, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Does that have to do with modern fluidity of genders, so it somehow affects genres? Was that the logic to do so? Movies are filmed in different countries, but that tag was never about location, where movie was filmed but COUNTRY/COUNTRIES OF PRODUCING COMPANIES. And it is sometimes hard to distinguish genres, as they mix up, but wikipedia should be the place to know the difference and classify those accordingly. It was the only source that gave such categorization, like a proper encyclopedia. So, why those things were removed? How its this even making life easier to search for genres of movies - so, any plans of making Movie list, that would show by year all the genres and countries... basically duplicating the same page, but WITH GENRES AND COUNTRIES OF PRODUCTION? By removing those tags Wikipedia has no value to search those films and understand if they were animations, for kids, sci-fi, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.147.206.144 ( talk) 02:03, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Sony has reportedly pulled the production date. I have no idea how to delete things in this format and don't want to screw it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.248.214.103 ( talk) 21:19, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Nope, it's completely cancelled now and is turning into two separate solo films. Mystic Moore 17:57, 19 August 2018
Whoever added bad boys iv accidentally messed up in humans inhumans is coming July 12 I'd do it myself but it always comes up weird when I do it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.139.165.106 ( talk) 14:20, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Removed Medium column and added Country to list of films.
I suggest the Year in film pages that are more than a year in the future get locked down. Have a link for regular editors to submit suggested updates for approval instead of messing with all the fanboyz adding their wishlists for stuff like Harry Potter and the Zombie Dumbledore Part LIV, or the Untitled cartoon from Disney Animation in December. I really can not believe those guys are going to make a cartoon, need citation.
If we start putting in every film that someone is THINKING about making the world will come to an end, especially once they see what I am thinking. Same thing with the sections for Highest-grossing films, Events and Notable deaths. We would probably get a bunch of weirdos checking every day to see when they are going to snuff it. Kid Bugs ( talk) 16:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
What about Star Wars IX since we know it is to be released in that year:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:257F:8200:7817:756D:49A6:26AD ( talk) 02:34, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
How did this get past the door-nazis? All it is is speculation, and anyway, when 2019 rolls around, the whole article will have to be basically blanked under WP:TNT. Would be uite fine to see this article get flushed. L3X1 Complaints Desk 17:29, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Lego Movie Sequel is the official title of the film, please change the title to this, thank you.
Source: http://www.cinemablend.com/new/LEGO-Movie-2-Going-Really-Obvious-With-Its-Official-Title-70983.html Lmthrowaway222 ( talk) 00:05, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2601:881:8000:C8E0:34A2:B010:B5FB:2A89 ( talk) 01:31, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Mark Ruffalo Saying No to "Avengers 4"!
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add Replicas movie in the list which is going to release on 11 January 2019. AwaisAhsan666 ( talk) 17:17, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change Avengers 4 title to Avengers: Endgame and move release date to April 26, 2019. BatmanArkhamFan1 ( talk) 14:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Some of the dates need to be changed.
The Aftermath has been moved to 15 March. /info/en/?search=The_Aftermath_(2019_film)
The Intruder has been pushed to May 3. /info/en/?search=The_Intruder_(2019_film)
Breakthrough has been moved to 17 April. /info/en/?search=Breakthrough_(2019_film)
The Translation of Wounds should be renamed to Wounds. /info/en/?search=Wounds_(film)
The Art of Racing in the Rain should be added to 27 September. /info/en/?search=The_Art_of_Racing_in_the_Rain_(film)
JFL42 ( talk) 01:56, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Some of the dates need to be changed.
The Aftermath has been moved to 15 March. /info/en/?search=The_Aftermath_(2019_film)
The Intruder has been pushed to May 3. /info/en/?search=The_Intruder_(2019_film)
Breakthrough has been moved to 17 April. /info/en/?search=Breakthrough_(2019_film)
The Translation of Wounds should be renamed to Wounds. /info/en/?search=Wounds_(film)
The Art of Racing in the Rain should be added to 27 September. /info/en/?search=The_Art_of_Racing_in_the_Rain_(film) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JFL42 ( talk • contribs) 00:55, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Some of the dates need to be changed.
The Aftermath has been moved to 15 March. /info/en/?search=The_Aftermath_(2019_film)
The Intruder has been pushed to May 3. /info/en/?search=The_Intruder_(2019_film)
Breakthrough has been moved to 17 April. /info/en/?search=Breakthrough_(2019_film)
The Translation of Wounds should be renamed to Wounds. /info/en/?search=Wounds_(film)
The Art of Racing in the Rain should be added to 27 September. /info/en/?search=The_Art_of_Racing_in_the_Rain_(film)
The Informer should be moved to March 22. /info/en/?search=The_Informer_(2019_film) JFL42 ( talk) 04:14, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Do the PK films count? If not then they should be removed. JFL43 ( talk) 02:35, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Pakistan movies should be removed as they are not big deal movies. JFL43 ( talk) 01:49, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The movie wounds in March is shifted to the left by one box. Please shift that row to the right so that it aligns with the rest of the columns. Cactuszombies ( talk) 20:31, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Are The secret Life Of Pets 2 not adventure ?? Aldiagung ( talk) 10:05, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
please correct the gross of the wandering earth to $650 millions 139.167.134.26 ( talk) 05:50, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
I want to ask , why there is not minecraft In may 24?? . It should be added Aldiagung ( talk) 09:01, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Ok thank you :) Aldiagung ( talk) 08:19, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Fox Searchlight's Ready or Not should be added to August 23. Guaslinger123 ( talk) 10:02, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Harriet should be added to November 1. Guaslinger123 ( talk) 12:55, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
I'd like to get opinions on my recent move to update the colors for highlighting months and dates within the release tables. Upon researching the history of the tables' use in past years in film pages, the colors seem to have been implemented for distinction for long tables. The first instance of this was in January–March 2006, and the colors used match those used in the Picture of the Day. My changes would concern April–December. Infinite mission ( talk) 07:13, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Old:
New:
And here's a source:
73.61.14.152 ( talk) 12:25, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Where'd You Go, Bernadette needs to be moved to August 16. Guaslinger123 ( talk) 00:33, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Parasite has an official US release date and enough info to add to the table (see ref here [2]). I tried adding it myself recently but it was removed for unknown reasons. It won the Palme d'Or and is therefore not a small movie unworthy of the list. (For reference, previous Palme d'Or winner Shoplifters appears on the 2018 list.) I am making the edit again and ask whoever removes it again to explain why here.
References
The release date for 47 Meters Down: Uncaged has changed from June 28 to August 16 - RVDDP2501 ( talk) 12:32, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Pardon my asking but I was wondering if films listed in each year of release (Films of 2019/Films of 2020/etc) should have an additional bit of information, identifying if they were/are a wide release or a limited release? Please let me know as I think that might be a relevant bit of information to include - RVDDP2501 ( talk) 16:03, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Would a short explanation and link to the main article of Disney's completed acquisition of 20th Century Fox be appropriate to include in the events section? Infinite mission ( talk) 19:57, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
The Film Is By Lionsgate and Scheduled For July 23th, 2019!
Shouldn't this movie be number 3 and Aladdin number 4? B.Valley ( talk) 03:10, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Both Spider-Man far from home and Aladdin have reached a billion dollars in the box office. And Spider-Man far from home made more money than Aladdin. 2601:CA:C201:D037:5D82:F868:ECF7:D66D ( talk) 16:15, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Disney 2019 has passed Disney’s 2016 worldwide record of $7.61 billion with $7.67 billion worldwide. Impressive!
How about we split the list of films given in this article under the header "2019 films" to something like List of American films of 2019? The article is about 2019 in film worldwide, not just the United States. All other sections, including major events and deaths, deal with a worldwide perspective, but all the films under "2019 films" are American, as far as I can tell. Ideally, we should be pointing to all the articles listed at Template:2019 films, which contain the complete list. DeluxeVegan ( talk) 10:52, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
DeluxeVegan ( talk) 12:04, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
@ Zedonathin2020: You showed complete disregard for consensus and went on to restore the older revision with a summary: "If one wanted to look up their countries movies, they could just search for them, we don’t need an entire page dedicated for that". I am sorry, but Wikipedia does not work like that. You were pinged twice during discussion above after you reverted once. Further changes that go against consensus will be reverted. DeluxeVegan ( talk) 12:47, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
I'm really confused. Is this talk page section the full extent of the discussion that is being used to justify substantial changes and removal of the film timeline? Seddon talk 15:57, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
The somewhat-full list of films released in 2019 is given here at The Numbers. I did a rough count and the films released from January 1 to January 10 alone cross 50! (For comparison, this article's January-March lists only 46 films, so you can imagine what a huge addition this would be). If we are not splitting by country (which I feel would be a bad idea as per size concerns clarified above), all these films would have to be added to this list. DeluxeVegan ( talk) 04:21, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
I'm with DeluxeVegan and the others agreeing with him.
zwaa 11:12, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Ne Zha, Huaxia Film Distribution Co.,Ltd has earned 425M, so have surpassed Alita Battle Angel and Detective Pokemon as 8th best film of 2019 95.236.164.93 ( talk) 12:01, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Could you add onto the year records that 2019 had the most number of films cross the 1 billion dollar mark (beating 2015 and 2018). Its pretty important 96.244.146.56 ( talk) 02:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Should the '2019 films' section of the article:
07:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
@ MarnetteD: Re: this revert and the closing summary, unless I am missing something, the third proposal, which had almost unanimous support, was to list all country-wise sublists in the article, as in this revision. Proposal two was to list all films released in a particular year, but that was discounted owing to size concerns. DeluxeVegan ( talk) 19:54, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Comment: - @
DeluxeVegan: I feel it really poor form that you ran an RfC and didn't notify previous participants. You've had multiple notes of opposition that number at least the number of participants who took park in the RfC. Consensus is not as clear cut as is being made out and you've made it a worse experience for our users. It also run out of place in comparison with previous years. The fact that you closed your own RfC is really out of process.
Seddon
talk
20:31, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
That was poorly advertise and voted. I want this reverted back the way it was. It was fine like it is and this is not helping improve WP:WORLDVIEW. BattleshipMan ( talk) 00:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Obviously there's been talks going on regarding this large change (though not as much as I think there could've been), but I think this change is really, really bad from a users perspective. Why not just have all English-language films on this page (as was always the case), and keep the separate pages for the non-English language films from their respective countries? TheMysteriousEditor ( talk) 21:52, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
@ Zedonathin2020: Do not WP:EDITWAR. Discuss what you want here, and demonstrate consensus. DeluxeVegan ( talk) 11:24, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
People of Wikipedia, this new format that has been brought up by DeluxeVegan is without a doubt, the worse change I’ve ever seen in all my years on this site. I’m pretty sure no one wants to take extra time looking up separate pages to find certain movies. I think it’s makes a lot more sense to keep going on with the original format. Also, who actually cares enough about movies being released in Japan? (Asides from the Japanese people of course) Zedonathin2020 ( talk) 14:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Naruto no Kitsune ( talk) 18:24, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Just revert the page back to it's original look and add the others as sub genres.
The grouping per county that has been applied for 2019 is not at all helping browsing through the movies. Also a movie that has been released for example in USA and in UK appears on both lists... (for example: killers anonymous) I believe that the format used on previous years like lets say 2018 is much more easy to browse through. Why not keep this format and give release country or countries in a column?
Regards George N.
It's clear from the tremendous amount of opposition over the past few months that the change is not merely unpopular but actively detrimental to the reader's experience. It was rammed through using the cudgel of WORLDVIEW, which is an essay describing a problem in Wikipedia but not a solution. The "solution" adopted here appears to be worse than the problem it was trying to solve: you have now segregated every country into its own silo. This leaves countries without a developed film industry without a home. With less viewer traffic, non-English language films will get less attention and therefore less polish and wiki magic. Separate but equal? Gimme a break. We need a reset back to what it was before as an interim fix as we discuss a more substantive solution that doesn't ruin the experience for everyone. Axem Titanium ( talk) 17:42, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
I don't think the new format is consistent with the meaning of the year in film articles and I don't think SIZERULES should be all that relevant for the old format of it. There should be at least a compromise that would allow to keep the old format while finding a way to have it met with WORLDVIEW. BattleshipMan ( talk) 05:27, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
This is not anything personal about DeluxeVegan (I'm sure that editor acted in good faith) but I think an RfC with so little discussion (comments from 7 editors, one of whom stated that two of the three options were acceptable) should not have been closed by the same person who opened it, especially considering that all previous yearly film articles do not follow the pattern recently created in this article. Was this RfC announced WT:WikiProject Film? If not it should have been to get a wider group of interested editors to comment. I would like to reopen the RfC to get more opinions, but I don't want to overstep my bounds since the RfC was opened and closed only recently. I would appreciate other opinions, and again this is nothing personal directed toward any editor. 75.191.40.148 ( talk) 21:17, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Reopening the RFC isn’t appropriate imo. DV probably shouldn’t have been the one to close, however the consensus was unanimous. It exceeded the minimum length so it’s a sound consensus. Rusted AutoParts 03:57, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
It may be relevant for the article that Joker has by now become the highest-grossing R-rated film of all time (so far), according to Forbes, Variety [2], and Hollywood Reporter [3]. And it's not even out of theaters yet. Forbes gives a gross of $800 million so far, while other sources say it's only $788.1 million, but in any case, the $711 million listed here are clearly out of date. -- 2003:EF:13DB:3B91:4540:AD6:1DBD:8F71 ( talk) 01:48, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
I wouldn't mind putting "Deaths" in a separate article as well. As-is, it fills a lot ( WP:PROPORTION) of vertical article space. Opinions? Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 12:02, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Shouldn't these be listed (even more than genre, which I see was added back) for every film as they're created (and back-added). At a minimum it'd make it easier for parents to check quickly to decide if a TV show or movie might be okay for their kids to watch, and it seems only logical that this should be listed SOMEWHERE in the Wikipedia article for EVERY movie that's had a rating. Was this discussed already? If so, why wasn't it added? I can't find anywhere else to post this that'd be more appropriate so I'll put it here (since new movies get listed here anyway first). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.254.152.32 ( talk) 01:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
I'm planning to set up a new proposal for 2019 in film to bring back the old format while trying to find a way to have it met with WP:WORLDWIDE. What DeluxeVegan proposed for it was totally unnecessary and really messed up the meaning of year in film articles. What year in films articles are about which films were released in that certain year, the births and deaths of notable film stars, directors, producers and such, the accolades that involved those films in these years and the highest box office results of that particular years. Readers have a right to know which films that were released in those years in that old format. How long the pages deemed irrelevant because readers have a right to scroll down to know which films came out in those years. When DeluxeVegan made that proposal, it took away the meaning of the year in film articles and replaced with the list of certain country films, which doesn't meet the criteria of what year in film articles for door. How long the pages are is deemed irrelevant and is not be considered because the old format has the meaning of year in film articles.
We need to find a way to restore the old format while trying to find a way to have it met with WP:WORLDWIDE. We need ideas to bring the old format back while maintaining to have it met with WP:WORLDWIDE. BattleshipMan ( talk) 06:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
how about changing it to the pre-2018 look and include only films with budget above $10M? so other Bollywood or Chinese films appears and it meets the WORLDVIEW criteria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.230.102.146 ( talk) 22:02, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Toy story 4 won Producer of Animated Theatrical Motion Pictures, why not include it on SAG, PGA, etc. column.
https://variety.com/2020/film/news/pga-awards-winners-2020-1203471639/ Ashokkumar47 ( talk) 06:22, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
remove the Lion King 2019 of the animated list, is not considerally a Animated film, with all favor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.161.191.23 ( talk) 16:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
After the success of The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Atlantis: The Lost Empire and Meet the Robinsons, Walt Disney Animation Studios produced the 1991 traditional cel animated film Beauty and the Beast and it was not re-released in IMAX and other giant screen theatres on New Year's Day 2019.
The musical sequence "Human Again" was written by Alan Menken and Howard Ashman. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.18.244 ( talk) 19:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
I don't really have anything to add - its most of a doubt clarification regarding this quote in the "Evaluation of the Year" section
"It's the year of apocalyptic cinema of the highest order, the year in which three of our best filmmakers have responded with vast ambition, invention, and inspiration to the crises at hand, including the threats to American democracy, the catastrophic menaces arising from global warming, the corrosive cruelty of ethnic hatreds and nationalist prejudices, and the poisonous overconcentration of money and power.
Who are the directors referred to here? And what films?
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2019, when it received 11,776,149 views. |
Some questions first:
Previous criteria seems to be more along the lines, that movies in this list were the ones, that were shown in cinemas worldwide. Not all of them were in English, but hey - this page was not about ALL movies. Not all of them are so important, that everyone should know about them. 195.147.206.144 ( talk) 09:05, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Does that have to do with modern fluidity of genders, so it somehow affects genres? Was that the logic to do so? Movies are filmed in different countries, but that tag was never about location, where movie was filmed but COUNTRY/COUNTRIES OF PRODUCING COMPANIES. And it is sometimes hard to distinguish genres, as they mix up, but wikipedia should be the place to know the difference and classify those accordingly. It was the only source that gave such categorization, like a proper encyclopedia. So, why those things were removed? How its this even making life easier to search for genres of movies - so, any plans of making Movie list, that would show by year all the genres and countries... basically duplicating the same page, but WITH GENRES AND COUNTRIES OF PRODUCTION? By removing those tags Wikipedia has no value to search those films and understand if they were animations, for kids, sci-fi, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.147.206.144 ( talk) 02:03, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Sony has reportedly pulled the production date. I have no idea how to delete things in this format and don't want to screw it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.248.214.103 ( talk) 21:19, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Nope, it's completely cancelled now and is turning into two separate solo films. Mystic Moore 17:57, 19 August 2018
Whoever added bad boys iv accidentally messed up in humans inhumans is coming July 12 I'd do it myself but it always comes up weird when I do it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.139.165.106 ( talk) 14:20, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Removed Medium column and added Country to list of films.
I suggest the Year in film pages that are more than a year in the future get locked down. Have a link for regular editors to submit suggested updates for approval instead of messing with all the fanboyz adding their wishlists for stuff like Harry Potter and the Zombie Dumbledore Part LIV, or the Untitled cartoon from Disney Animation in December. I really can not believe those guys are going to make a cartoon, need citation.
If we start putting in every film that someone is THINKING about making the world will come to an end, especially once they see what I am thinking. Same thing with the sections for Highest-grossing films, Events and Notable deaths. We would probably get a bunch of weirdos checking every day to see when they are going to snuff it. Kid Bugs ( talk) 16:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
What about Star Wars IX since we know it is to be released in that year:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:257F:8200:7817:756D:49A6:26AD ( talk) 02:34, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
How did this get past the door-nazis? All it is is speculation, and anyway, when 2019 rolls around, the whole article will have to be basically blanked under WP:TNT. Would be uite fine to see this article get flushed. L3X1 Complaints Desk 17:29, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Lego Movie Sequel is the official title of the film, please change the title to this, thank you.
Source: http://www.cinemablend.com/new/LEGO-Movie-2-Going-Really-Obvious-With-Its-Official-Title-70983.html Lmthrowaway222 ( talk) 00:05, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2601:881:8000:C8E0:34A2:B010:B5FB:2A89 ( talk) 01:31, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Mark Ruffalo Saying No to "Avengers 4"!
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add Replicas movie in the list which is going to release on 11 January 2019. AwaisAhsan666 ( talk) 17:17, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change Avengers 4 title to Avengers: Endgame and move release date to April 26, 2019. BatmanArkhamFan1 ( talk) 14:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Some of the dates need to be changed.
The Aftermath has been moved to 15 March. /info/en/?search=The_Aftermath_(2019_film)
The Intruder has been pushed to May 3. /info/en/?search=The_Intruder_(2019_film)
Breakthrough has been moved to 17 April. /info/en/?search=Breakthrough_(2019_film)
The Translation of Wounds should be renamed to Wounds. /info/en/?search=Wounds_(film)
The Art of Racing in the Rain should be added to 27 September. /info/en/?search=The_Art_of_Racing_in_the_Rain_(film)
JFL42 ( talk) 01:56, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Some of the dates need to be changed.
The Aftermath has been moved to 15 March. /info/en/?search=The_Aftermath_(2019_film)
The Intruder has been pushed to May 3. /info/en/?search=The_Intruder_(2019_film)
Breakthrough has been moved to 17 April. /info/en/?search=Breakthrough_(2019_film)
The Translation of Wounds should be renamed to Wounds. /info/en/?search=Wounds_(film)
The Art of Racing in the Rain should be added to 27 September. /info/en/?search=The_Art_of_Racing_in_the_Rain_(film) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JFL42 ( talk • contribs) 00:55, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Some of the dates need to be changed.
The Aftermath has been moved to 15 March. /info/en/?search=The_Aftermath_(2019_film)
The Intruder has been pushed to May 3. /info/en/?search=The_Intruder_(2019_film)
Breakthrough has been moved to 17 April. /info/en/?search=Breakthrough_(2019_film)
The Translation of Wounds should be renamed to Wounds. /info/en/?search=Wounds_(film)
The Art of Racing in the Rain should be added to 27 September. /info/en/?search=The_Art_of_Racing_in_the_Rain_(film)
The Informer should be moved to March 22. /info/en/?search=The_Informer_(2019_film) JFL42 ( talk) 04:14, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Do the PK films count? If not then they should be removed. JFL43 ( talk) 02:35, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Pakistan movies should be removed as they are not big deal movies. JFL43 ( talk) 01:49, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The movie wounds in March is shifted to the left by one box. Please shift that row to the right so that it aligns with the rest of the columns. Cactuszombies ( talk) 20:31, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Are The secret Life Of Pets 2 not adventure ?? Aldiagung ( talk) 10:05, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
please correct the gross of the wandering earth to $650 millions 139.167.134.26 ( talk) 05:50, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
I want to ask , why there is not minecraft In may 24?? . It should be added Aldiagung ( talk) 09:01, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Ok thank you :) Aldiagung ( talk) 08:19, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Fox Searchlight's Ready or Not should be added to August 23. Guaslinger123 ( talk) 10:02, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Harriet should be added to November 1. Guaslinger123 ( talk) 12:55, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
I'd like to get opinions on my recent move to update the colors for highlighting months and dates within the release tables. Upon researching the history of the tables' use in past years in film pages, the colors seem to have been implemented for distinction for long tables. The first instance of this was in January–March 2006, and the colors used match those used in the Picture of the Day. My changes would concern April–December. Infinite mission ( talk) 07:13, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Old:
New:
And here's a source:
73.61.14.152 ( talk) 12:25, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Where'd You Go, Bernadette needs to be moved to August 16. Guaslinger123 ( talk) 00:33, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Parasite has an official US release date and enough info to add to the table (see ref here [2]). I tried adding it myself recently but it was removed for unknown reasons. It won the Palme d'Or and is therefore not a small movie unworthy of the list. (For reference, previous Palme d'Or winner Shoplifters appears on the 2018 list.) I am making the edit again and ask whoever removes it again to explain why here.
References
The release date for 47 Meters Down: Uncaged has changed from June 28 to August 16 - RVDDP2501 ( talk) 12:32, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Pardon my asking but I was wondering if films listed in each year of release (Films of 2019/Films of 2020/etc) should have an additional bit of information, identifying if they were/are a wide release or a limited release? Please let me know as I think that might be a relevant bit of information to include - RVDDP2501 ( talk) 16:03, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Would a short explanation and link to the main article of Disney's completed acquisition of 20th Century Fox be appropriate to include in the events section? Infinite mission ( talk) 19:57, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
The Film Is By Lionsgate and Scheduled For July 23th, 2019!
Shouldn't this movie be number 3 and Aladdin number 4? B.Valley ( talk) 03:10, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Both Spider-Man far from home and Aladdin have reached a billion dollars in the box office. And Spider-Man far from home made more money than Aladdin. 2601:CA:C201:D037:5D82:F868:ECF7:D66D ( talk) 16:15, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Disney 2019 has passed Disney’s 2016 worldwide record of $7.61 billion with $7.67 billion worldwide. Impressive!
How about we split the list of films given in this article under the header "2019 films" to something like List of American films of 2019? The article is about 2019 in film worldwide, not just the United States. All other sections, including major events and deaths, deal with a worldwide perspective, but all the films under "2019 films" are American, as far as I can tell. Ideally, we should be pointing to all the articles listed at Template:2019 films, which contain the complete list. DeluxeVegan ( talk) 10:52, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
DeluxeVegan ( talk) 12:04, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
@ Zedonathin2020: You showed complete disregard for consensus and went on to restore the older revision with a summary: "If one wanted to look up their countries movies, they could just search for them, we don’t need an entire page dedicated for that". I am sorry, but Wikipedia does not work like that. You were pinged twice during discussion above after you reverted once. Further changes that go against consensus will be reverted. DeluxeVegan ( talk) 12:47, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
I'm really confused. Is this talk page section the full extent of the discussion that is being used to justify substantial changes and removal of the film timeline? Seddon talk 15:57, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
The somewhat-full list of films released in 2019 is given here at The Numbers. I did a rough count and the films released from January 1 to January 10 alone cross 50! (For comparison, this article's January-March lists only 46 films, so you can imagine what a huge addition this would be). If we are not splitting by country (which I feel would be a bad idea as per size concerns clarified above), all these films would have to be added to this list. DeluxeVegan ( talk) 04:21, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
I'm with DeluxeVegan and the others agreeing with him.
zwaa 11:12, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Ne Zha, Huaxia Film Distribution Co.,Ltd has earned 425M, so have surpassed Alita Battle Angel and Detective Pokemon as 8th best film of 2019 95.236.164.93 ( talk) 12:01, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Could you add onto the year records that 2019 had the most number of films cross the 1 billion dollar mark (beating 2015 and 2018). Its pretty important 96.244.146.56 ( talk) 02:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Should the '2019 films' section of the article:
07:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
@ MarnetteD: Re: this revert and the closing summary, unless I am missing something, the third proposal, which had almost unanimous support, was to list all country-wise sublists in the article, as in this revision. Proposal two was to list all films released in a particular year, but that was discounted owing to size concerns. DeluxeVegan ( talk) 19:54, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Comment: - @
DeluxeVegan: I feel it really poor form that you ran an RfC and didn't notify previous participants. You've had multiple notes of opposition that number at least the number of participants who took park in the RfC. Consensus is not as clear cut as is being made out and you've made it a worse experience for our users. It also run out of place in comparison with previous years. The fact that you closed your own RfC is really out of process.
Seddon
talk
20:31, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
That was poorly advertise and voted. I want this reverted back the way it was. It was fine like it is and this is not helping improve WP:WORLDVIEW. BattleshipMan ( talk) 00:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Obviously there's been talks going on regarding this large change (though not as much as I think there could've been), but I think this change is really, really bad from a users perspective. Why not just have all English-language films on this page (as was always the case), and keep the separate pages for the non-English language films from their respective countries? TheMysteriousEditor ( talk) 21:52, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
@ Zedonathin2020: Do not WP:EDITWAR. Discuss what you want here, and demonstrate consensus. DeluxeVegan ( talk) 11:24, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
People of Wikipedia, this new format that has been brought up by DeluxeVegan is without a doubt, the worse change I’ve ever seen in all my years on this site. I’m pretty sure no one wants to take extra time looking up separate pages to find certain movies. I think it’s makes a lot more sense to keep going on with the original format. Also, who actually cares enough about movies being released in Japan? (Asides from the Japanese people of course) Zedonathin2020 ( talk) 14:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Naruto no Kitsune ( talk) 18:24, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Just revert the page back to it's original look and add the others as sub genres.
The grouping per county that has been applied for 2019 is not at all helping browsing through the movies. Also a movie that has been released for example in USA and in UK appears on both lists... (for example: killers anonymous) I believe that the format used on previous years like lets say 2018 is much more easy to browse through. Why not keep this format and give release country or countries in a column?
Regards George N.
It's clear from the tremendous amount of opposition over the past few months that the change is not merely unpopular but actively detrimental to the reader's experience. It was rammed through using the cudgel of WORLDVIEW, which is an essay describing a problem in Wikipedia but not a solution. The "solution" adopted here appears to be worse than the problem it was trying to solve: you have now segregated every country into its own silo. This leaves countries without a developed film industry without a home. With less viewer traffic, non-English language films will get less attention and therefore less polish and wiki magic. Separate but equal? Gimme a break. We need a reset back to what it was before as an interim fix as we discuss a more substantive solution that doesn't ruin the experience for everyone. Axem Titanium ( talk) 17:42, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
I don't think the new format is consistent with the meaning of the year in film articles and I don't think SIZERULES should be all that relevant for the old format of it. There should be at least a compromise that would allow to keep the old format while finding a way to have it met with WORLDVIEW. BattleshipMan ( talk) 05:27, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
This is not anything personal about DeluxeVegan (I'm sure that editor acted in good faith) but I think an RfC with so little discussion (comments from 7 editors, one of whom stated that two of the three options were acceptable) should not have been closed by the same person who opened it, especially considering that all previous yearly film articles do not follow the pattern recently created in this article. Was this RfC announced WT:WikiProject Film? If not it should have been to get a wider group of interested editors to comment. I would like to reopen the RfC to get more opinions, but I don't want to overstep my bounds since the RfC was opened and closed only recently. I would appreciate other opinions, and again this is nothing personal directed toward any editor. 75.191.40.148 ( talk) 21:17, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Reopening the RFC isn’t appropriate imo. DV probably shouldn’t have been the one to close, however the consensus was unanimous. It exceeded the minimum length so it’s a sound consensus. Rusted AutoParts 03:57, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
It may be relevant for the article that Joker has by now become the highest-grossing R-rated film of all time (so far), according to Forbes, Variety [2], and Hollywood Reporter [3]. And it's not even out of theaters yet. Forbes gives a gross of $800 million so far, while other sources say it's only $788.1 million, but in any case, the $711 million listed here are clearly out of date. -- 2003:EF:13DB:3B91:4540:AD6:1DBD:8F71 ( talk) 01:48, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
I wouldn't mind putting "Deaths" in a separate article as well. As-is, it fills a lot ( WP:PROPORTION) of vertical article space. Opinions? Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 12:02, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Shouldn't these be listed (even more than genre, which I see was added back) for every film as they're created (and back-added). At a minimum it'd make it easier for parents to check quickly to decide if a TV show or movie might be okay for their kids to watch, and it seems only logical that this should be listed SOMEWHERE in the Wikipedia article for EVERY movie that's had a rating. Was this discussed already? If so, why wasn't it added? I can't find anywhere else to post this that'd be more appropriate so I'll put it here (since new movies get listed here anyway first). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.254.152.32 ( talk) 01:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
I'm planning to set up a new proposal for 2019 in film to bring back the old format while trying to find a way to have it met with WP:WORLDWIDE. What DeluxeVegan proposed for it was totally unnecessary and really messed up the meaning of year in film articles. What year in films articles are about which films were released in that certain year, the births and deaths of notable film stars, directors, producers and such, the accolades that involved those films in these years and the highest box office results of that particular years. Readers have a right to know which films that were released in those years in that old format. How long the pages deemed irrelevant because readers have a right to scroll down to know which films came out in those years. When DeluxeVegan made that proposal, it took away the meaning of the year in film articles and replaced with the list of certain country films, which doesn't meet the criteria of what year in film articles for door. How long the pages are is deemed irrelevant and is not be considered because the old format has the meaning of year in film articles.
We need to find a way to restore the old format while trying to find a way to have it met with WP:WORLDWIDE. We need ideas to bring the old format back while maintaining to have it met with WP:WORLDWIDE. BattleshipMan ( talk) 06:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
how about changing it to the pre-2018 look and include only films with budget above $10M? so other Bollywood or Chinese films appears and it meets the WORLDVIEW criteria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.230.102.146 ( talk) 22:02, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Toy story 4 won Producer of Animated Theatrical Motion Pictures, why not include it on SAG, PGA, etc. column.
https://variety.com/2020/film/news/pga-awards-winners-2020-1203471639/ Ashokkumar47 ( talk) 06:22, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
remove the Lion King 2019 of the animated list, is not considerally a Animated film, with all favor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.161.191.23 ( talk) 16:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
After the success of The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Atlantis: The Lost Empire and Meet the Robinsons, Walt Disney Animation Studios produced the 1991 traditional cel animated film Beauty and the Beast and it was not re-released in IMAX and other giant screen theatres on New Year's Day 2019.
The musical sequence "Human Again" was written by Alan Menken and Howard Ashman. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.18.244 ( talk) 19:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
I don't really have anything to add - its most of a doubt clarification regarding this quote in the "Evaluation of the Year" section
"It's the year of apocalyptic cinema of the highest order, the year in which three of our best filmmakers have responded with vast ambition, invention, and inspiration to the crises at hand, including the threats to American democracy, the catastrophic menaces arising from global warming, the corrosive cruelty of ethnic hatreds and nationalist prejudices, and the poisonous overconcentration of money and power.
Who are the directors referred to here? And what films?